Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: ExpertNovice
Since your :roll indicates that you supported Senator Kerry and his not doing his job then and assuming you are not a hypocrite you would support any politician if they simply walked off the job for a year. On this issue you and I will have to agree to disagree.
I continue to be amazed that Senator Kerry's "attendance problem" ever had any traction with the voting public, and it's a testament to the temerity of Karl Rove and the ignorance of voters.
EVERY elected official who runs for office from another political job (including President Bush, who was only halfway into his second term as Governor of Texas when he ran for President, among many others) has to sacrifice his present duties to some degree, in favor of pursuing higher office.
For that matter, what about running for re-election? Wouldn't you agree that President Bush, in 2004, must have been distracted from his duties as President by his campaigning? Should he, by your logic, have resigned from his job as President in order to run for a second term? As crazy as that suggestion sounds, it is exactly as crazy as people objecting to Senator Kerry's taking time during his tenure as a senator in order to campaign for President.
This "issue" has existed for as long as there have been elections - the only reason it arose in the 2004 campaign is that few campaign managers have historically been as shameless as Karl Rove.