Originally posted by: Infidel
Originally posted by:chess9
Good advice.
Is the OP absolutely certain the buyer loses all his escrow money if a bank or other lender won't lend the money? I'm having a lot of trouble wrapping my head around that. I've been out of settlements for a few years, but if this is happening in this market, I'm amazed.
-Robert
Yep, I've been part to 3 contracts in the last few months, each one was boilerplate with the exact same verbiage. If notice isn't given in X days that financing can't be obtained, buyer forfeits earnest money. It cost me $2100 the hard way to find out, but, if I had entered a contract that indicated financing was contingent on my house selling (contingency contract) most sellers wouldn't have accepted it. This was really how I should have done it, but I had no idea at the time that my financing was contingent on my house selling, since my 2 previous home purchases weren't.
Regarding the attorney, they had a few changes that, obviously, the realtor did not have the ability to include/implement in the contract. The realtor was afraid of scaring off the buyer with excessive language, afraid of his liability if he didn't use the standard realty assoc. form, time was of the essence etc. Changes to the lease agreement were poo-pooed because the buyers were doing this as a "favor" to us so we could get financing. Yet, the buyer, his wife and 3 young children had been living in a hotel room for 3 weeks and were desperate to get into the house, so it wasn't really a "favor" to anyone.
In both my buying and selling this time around, I've learned that the buyer/seller is almost always more reasonable and flexible than the realtor lets on. A lot of headaches and difficulties could have been avoided if information didn't have to go through 3 people. Now I speak directly with the buyer, because we're the only ones with the same goals.
Sort of a silver lining, after the first house fell through, I had to liquidate my 401K to meet cash requirements. I was starting work with a new company, so my 401K was available, and it was almost entirely composed of profit sharing dividends (not my own contributions) and I was fully vested. So, 2 months ago I pulled out the money, intending to put it back in within the 60 day limit, which didn't happen. Considering the markets, I think it may have been fortuitous that I got it all out, in spite of the taxes and fees.