yhelothar
Lifer
- Dec 11, 2002
- 18,407
- 39
- 91
Originally posted by: AMDUALY
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
Originally posted by: AMDUALY
Originally posted by: SLCentral
Okay guys, here's what I've decided after a lot of thinking:
I'm def. eventually going to invest in a amp for the home. Probably set it up right by my bed, so I can lie down and relax and listen to music with amazing quality. Maybe I'll have it by my computer instead. That's not important.
But, for portable use, I just think that it doesn't make sense to use an amp at this point. It's too much to carry, and the one amp that's built around the design of the iPod (so it clips in) has gotten poor reviews, especially for use with the Ultimate Ears custom line. I'd rather sacrifice some sound quality while on the go in order to keep it portable.
:thumbsup:
and very true.
I hardly use my headphone amp. I usually care for quality when I'm at home relaxing.
I wouldn't bother with an amp with a cheapo E2C either.
I guess. You'd be suprised that it does help with these "cheapo" headphones. Almost all portable players underpower headphones.
I like how you assume things without trying any of it. (ie. FLAC, grado, e2c, amp with all of the above) Btw, i did not make an assumption about lossless sounding better than lossy files. It is just straight up fact that the two will not be the same. Whether it is noticeable to some people is a different story. If you listen to a lossy source over and over and over, your ears will be able to pick up minute differences the next time you listen with a lossless source. (simply. ear gets used to hearing a certain pattern, small changes will become apparent)
Yeah, I don't doubt you if you claim you can pass blind tests. Some people have trained ears to hear the difference. Most people don't.
I had an E2C for a while. I thought that would be all I needed. I was wrong.
BTW, check out the kramer mod on head-fi for the E2C. It'll make it have less of the tunnel syndrome.