Originally posted by: ja1484
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: ja1484
"100% financing" is a euphemism for "buying shit with money I don't have" which is a euphemism for "going into debt" which is a euphemism for "everything that made this country go economically wrong since the Reagan administration".
100% financing was fine for those that intended to pay their bills. The problem was giving 100% financing to those with low to less than 600 scores and also doing such loans entering a rapidly declining market.
Details...
Not sure what you are looking for. Not everyone given 100% or even the 103% financing has defaulted. When it was offered if you did have a substantial downpayment, the stock market was paying A LOT more than the interest costs on average.
However, they gave these loans based on NINA, NISA, SINA, SISA (
No,
Stated,
Income,
Assets) to people that were W2 income and simple checking/savings account types. These types of loans were designed for those whose lives pretty much demonstrate their ability to repay a debt.
They created people putting in apps like the 24 year old dude we got that claimed he made about $10k per month at applebees. We told him we needed W2's and he got his loan elsewhere.
Now those with no juice into the home and now looking at a home worth up to 70% less than what they paid are asking themselves some pretty serious ethics questions.
Do I just walk away or do I hope for a rebound? Many had no intentions on living in these homes, they just wanted the flip. If they had 20% of their own money in it they may not do so. I personally think 3-5% will not keep a people from walking, but I don't think we are going to be in this situation again for at least another 15 years.