- Jun 26, 2006
- 10,769
- 52
- 91
http://www.calgunsfoundation.org/roster/
The CA DOJ has recently been requiring manufacturers to retest their guns upon renewal of their spot on the "Approved Handgun Roster". Previously, a gun model needed to only be tested once, and then could be renewed without retesting indefinitely.
Since CA DOJ now believes that "microstamping" technology is viable, all semiautomatics that are tested must have microstamping, or they will be denied. Zero guns that are commercially available today have this technology. All guns currently on the roster will drop from the roster by 2015.
Note that there are zero guns that have been recently approved, and hundreds of guns that have recently dropped off:
http://certguns.doj.ca.gov/
Ruger, the largest manufacturer of small arms in the US has already announced that they are pulling out of the CA market:
The supposed benefit of microstamping is that a spent casing can be matched the gun that fired it. Unfortunately the proponents of this technology don't seem to understand that shooting ranges have thousands of spent casings lying on the ground, just waiting for someone to pick them up. Also, the stamp could easily be ground off of the firing pin by someone with a metal file and two minutes of time.
Is this what "reasonable" and "intelligent" gun control is? :hmm:
The CA DOJ has recently been requiring manufacturers to retest their guns upon renewal of their spot on the "Approved Handgun Roster". Previously, a gun model needed to only be tested once, and then could be renewed without retesting indefinitely.
Since CA DOJ now believes that "microstamping" technology is viable, all semiautomatics that are tested must have microstamping, or they will be denied. Zero guns that are commercially available today have this technology. All guns currently on the roster will drop from the roster by 2015.
Note that there are zero guns that have been recently approved, and hundreds of guns that have recently dropped off:
http://certguns.doj.ca.gov/
Ruger, the largest manufacturer of small arms in the US has already announced that they are pulling out of the CA market:
We are now being forced to retest all of our guns (pistols and double
action revolvers) as their time on the roster expires. And we are having
them all retested. But we cannot meet the micro-stamping requirement for
the pistols. These guns are passing all the tests they passed the first
time around, but there is no technology that can pass the micro-stamping
requirement, so the CADOJ is refusing to recertify the pistols and
consequently they are not getting renewed on the list. The CADOJ will not
even accept the data from the test labs that shows the guns passed every
test except the microstamping.
The net result is that the double-action revolvers are getting renewed on
the list, and the pistols are not. But we are trying everything we can to
get them back on the list.
The supposed benefit of microstamping is that a spent casing can be matched the gun that fired it. Unfortunately the proponents of this technology don't seem to understand that shooting ranges have thousands of spent casings lying on the ground, just waiting for someone to pick them up. Also, the stamp could easily be ground off of the firing pin by someone with a metal file and two minutes of time.
Is this what "reasonable" and "intelligent" gun control is? :hmm:
Last edited: