California bullet train cost surges by $2.8 billion: 'Worst-case scenario has happened'

Page 8 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Jul 9, 2009
10,723
2,064
136
GOP and Trumptards are currently feuding with Jerry Brown, an actually competent national leader, because Trump had an anuerysm the other night

cue Tajtard and the talking point of the year: "hahahah the CA progress-train! what a failure! TRUMP RULES!"

what a fucking retarded idiot.
I have a problem that the people that wrote Proposition 1-A lied about how much it would cost, lied about how long it would take to build, lied about where it would go and lied about how fast it would get there. Why aren't you angry that the proponents of Proposition 1-A lied?
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,947
126
Meanwhile, we have a over $120 billion in public pension liabilities. Kind of makes the $100 billion dollar train to nowhere look like money well spent.

Did you buy all the food you are going to eat for the rest of your life last week?
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
38,003
18,350
146
It's difficult for me to fathom how an adult can be this ignorant.
Do you think people will like you if you jump on the band wagon? Is it all about the approval of others, or is it just that hate makes you feel superior?
Just call it maga, it's what you describe.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,723
2,064
136
Reactions: SlowSpyder

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
46,884
34,847
136
Most media has gotten what Newsom meant wrong. Basically he's not going to have CA foot the bill for the remaining expensive bits (Pacheco and Tehachapi tunnels) alone. The state will seek federal money. The state will continue environmental and engineering studies on the connections to SF and LA so when funds are available construction can begin. Realistically neither of those projects would be starting for several years anyway.
 
Reactions: Meghan54 and OrByte

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,001
126
Tens of billions to create a solution for a problem that doesn't exist? Democrats are onboard.

A few billions dollars to help secure our southern border, make a dent in human trafficking? No, too expensive (aka Trump wants something, even something the Democrats called for, Democrats must obstruct).
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,825
49,526
136
Tens of billions to create a solution for a problem that doesn't exist? Democrats are onboard.

A few billions dollars to help secure our southern border, make a dent in human trafficking? No, too expensive (aka Trump wants something, even something the Democrats called for, Democrats must obstruct).

You are really not taking his loss well. Face facts, Americans don't want the useless wall and they disliked him trying to shut the government down for it even more. That's why he lost. Next time he should try some more mainstream positions, no?
 
Reactions: greatnoob

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,415
14,307
136
Tens of billions to create a solution for a problem that doesn't exist? Democrats are onboard.

A few billions dollars to help secure our southern border, make a dent in human trafficking? No, too expensive (aka Trump wants something, even something the Democrats called for, Democrats must obstruct).
The irony of an oblivious dipshit complaining about spending money for a problem that doesn't exist while saying that we need to spend money on another problem that doesn't exist.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,825
49,526
136
Most media has gotten what Newsom meant wrong. Basically he's not going to have CA foot the bill for the remaining expensive bits (Pacheco and Tehachapi tunnels) alone. The state will seek federal money. The state will continue environmental and engineering studies on the connections to SF and LA so when funds are available construction can begin. Realistically neither of those projects would be starting for several years anyway.

One thing we need to figure out for this project (and other infrastructure projects in general) is that overall costs per mile in the US are out of control as compared to other developed countries. I'm sure there are a dozen reasons why that is but one of the big ones is land acquisition costs and such. I know people on here hate eminent domain but that's one of the things it was created for and we should use it more.

EDIT: We should also limit the ability of litigation to hold these projects up. New York has this problem constantly when attempting to build in wealthy areas, the residents simply band together and attempt to litigate the city into exhaustion. The end result is the whole city suffers.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
46,884
34,847
136
One thing we need to figure out for this project (and other infrastructure projects in general) is that overall costs per mile in the US are out of control as compared to other developed countries. I'm sure there are a dozen reasons why that is but one of the big ones is land acquisition costs and such. I know people on here hate eminent domain but that's one of the things it was created for and we should use it more.

A major problem with CAHSR specifically was that they started building before having all the land acquired. Turned into a very expensive and long clusterfuck. ED would have been pretty useful in speeding this up if there was any political will to use it. Unfortunately the whole starting the system in the middle plan as a sop to Central Valley politicians/voters was ill advised and artificially constraining so it's clear such will is in short supply.

While this works itself out I'd like to see CA shift some attention to the LOSSAN Corridor between SD and LA. A couple billion dollars could electrify the route, cut the SD-LA time to less than 2 hours, and drastically increase capacity in a place that needs it within a couple years. Basically do what Caltrain is doing between San Jose and San Francisco.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,820
29,571
146
Tens of billions to create a solution for a problem that doesn't exist? Democrats are onboard.

A few billions dollars to help secure our southern border, make a dent in human trafficking? No, too expensive (aka Trump wants something, even something the Democrats called for, Democrats must obstruct).

the derp in your post is self-explanatory
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
36,289
28,144
136
Can you imagine trying to build the Hoover dam today? Short term thinking would bitch and moan about what it would cost in today's dollars 700-800 Million. Increases in labor and material costs means it would be at least 2-3 billion, best guest.

That project paid for itself many times over. We are to busy thinking about present day costs and not looking long term
 

realibrad

Lifer
Oct 18, 2013
12,337
898
126
Can you imagine trying to build the Hoover dam today? Short term thinking would bitch and moan about what it would cost in today's dollars 700-800 Million. Increases in labor and material costs means it would be at least 2-3 billion, best guest.

That project paid for itself many times over. We are to busy thinking about present day costs and not looking long term

Would not get done, and the Left would be a major factor. That damn had huge impacts on nature. The human deaths from its construction would also be a major factor. That really would trigger both sides.
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,001
126
You are really not taking his loss well. Face facts, Americans don't want the useless wall and they disliked him trying to shut the government down for it even more. That's why he lost. Next time he should try some more mainstream positions, no?

Cheeleading.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,947
126
Can you imagine trying to build the Hoover dam today? Short term thinking would bitch and moan about what it would cost in today's dollars 700-800 Million. Increases in labor and material costs means it would be at least 2-3 billion, best guest.

That project paid for itself many times over. We are to busy thinking about present day costs and not looking long term

There was huge resistance to building the national highway system. It was the same arguments.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,825
49,526
136
A major problem with CAHSR specifically was that they started building before having all the land acquired. Turned into a very expensive and long clusterfuck. ED would have been pretty useful in speeding this up if there was any political will to use it. Unfortunately the whole starting the system in the middle plan as a sop to Central Valley politicians/voters was ill advised and artificially constraining so it's clear such will is in short supply.

While this works itself out I'd like to see CA shift some attention to the LOSSAN Corridor between SD and LA. A couple billion dollars could electrify the route, cut the SD-LA time to less than 2 hours, and drastically increase capacity in a place that needs it within a couple years. Basically do what Caltrain is doing between San Jose and San Francisco.

Yup. I remember saying at the time that starting the high speed rail where they did was a mistake. They should have started where the benefit would be obvious and built out from there.

It is sad that there's so little will to expand use of eminent domain because I think it's one of the biggest obstacles to the US constructing what it needs to construct. A place where property rights are so strong that a handful of rich people can inhibit the construction of something that will help millions and millions of people is a place where property rights have become a straightjacket instead of something liberating.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,825
49,526
136
Did you buy all the food you are going to eat for the rest of your life last week?

It's weird that people try to equate public pension liabilities to private pension liabilities. They are not the same and they will never be the same. That is unless you think we will be disbanding California sometime soon.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
46,884
34,847
136
Yup. I remember saying at the time that starting the high speed rail where they did was a mistake. They should have started where the benefit would be obvious and built out from there.

It is sad that there's so little will to expand use of eminent domain because I think it's one of the biggest obstacles to the US constructing what it needs to construct. A place where property rights are so strong that a handful of rich people can inhibit the construction of something that will help millions and millions of people is a place where property rights have become a straightjacket instead of something liberating.

Yeah, just ED the whole damned right of way and let people fight you in court over fair market value while you build away.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,825
49,526
136
Yeah, just ED the whole damned right of way and let people fight you in court over fair market value while you build away.

While I agree lack of eminent domain is a big part of the problem there’s also other bullshit litigation that people use to impede construction such as this:

https://www.dnainfo.com/20110216/up...lding-sues-mta-over-planned-subway-entrances/

The building in this case eventually litigated the MTA into exhaustion through bullshit arguments like ‘this will lead to crowded sidewalks IN FUCKING MANHATTAN’.

The building just kept using lawsuits to force the MTA to study the placement of a simple exit so much that they eventually gave up because it just wasn’t worth the fight. This sort of legal harassment of necessary infrastructure needs to be curbed as well.
 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
20,656
5,346
136
Most media has gotten what Newsom meant wrong. Basically he's not going to have CA foot the bill for the remaining expensive bits (Pacheco and Tehachapi tunnels) alone. The state will seek federal money. The state will continue environmental and engineering studies on the connections to SF and LA so when funds are available construction can begin. Realistically neither of those projects would be starting for several years anyway.
The project will never be completed. The budget is already out of control, the land acquisition costs are going to be crippling, and the end result will be a moderate speed rail system that's slower and costs more than flying.
This thing is a clusterfuck of biblical proportions that will be a never ending drain on the tax payers. Kill it with fire.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,825
49,526
136
Does anyone have the total dollar amount wasted on this?

How much is the wall again...?

I’m confused as to why you think arguing that because money was wasted in one place that we should waste additional money in another place.

If America wanted to build a useless wall they would have elected a congress to fund that wall. Instead they elected the opposite. It’s time for the right to come back towards the mainstream on this issue.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |