California on the verge of passing sweeping gun control measures

[thesmokingman]

What we don't have a right to Red Dawn in case the Ruskies come?

 

[CaptainGoodnight]

I want them to be happy.

No you don't.

 

[JSt0rm]

No you don't.

I dont? What do guns need to be happy?

 

[JSt0rm]

I think I figured out part of the problem. Gun nuts think guns have feelings.

 

[CaptainGoodnight]

I think I figured out part of the problem. Gun nuts think guns have feelings.

No, it's always been the problem that gun grabbers don't realize that guns are inanimate objects. That's it's people and complex social issues.

 

[JSt0rm]

No, it's always been the problem that gun grabbers don't realize that guns are inanimate objects. That's it's people and complex social issues.

look at these noobs not caring about your gun rights or the guns feelings:

 

[CaptainGoodnight]

look at these noobs not caring about your gun rights or the guns feelings:

Fuck you. I grew up in Bosina. Tell me about war.

 

[JSt0rm]

Fuck you. I grew up in Bosina. Tell me about war.

What does war have to do with your rights to kill your fellow citizen?

 

[Jerem]

Ok, ammo database: What how does it address reloading? Or buying out of state?

In AB 156:

30368. (a) Commencing July 1, 2019, a resident of this state shall not bring or transport into this state any ammunition that he or she purchased from outside of this state unless he or she first has that ammunition delivered to an ammunition vendor in this state for delivery to that resident pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 30366.

As for reloading I'd bet powder will required to be tracked soon also.

 

[CaptainGoodnight]

What does war have to do with your rights to kill your fellow citizen?

Gun rights don't equate the right to kill your fellow citizen. The state has killed more people than private guns ever will.

 

[JSt0rm]

Gun rights don't equate the right to kill your fellow citizen. The state has killed more people than private guns ever will.

So you think the only thing stopping the liberals from rounding you up and executing you is your plinker?

 

[CaptainGoodnight]

So you think the only thing stopping the liberals from rounding you up and executing you is your plinker?

Do you think eliminating guns will stop school shootings?

 

[buckshot24]

Yeah, we already have laws against killing people, why do we need to eliminate guns?

 

[JSt0rm]

Do you think eliminating guns will stop school shootings?

Of course it would.

 

[Zorkorist]

We should mandate orange juice and marmalade umbrellas!

-John

 

[buckshot24]

Do you think eliminating guns will stop school shootings?

Probably not the most well thought out question.

 

[JSt0rm]

Probably not the most well thought out question.

 

[CaptainGoodnight]

Probably not the most well thought out question.

As long as he admitted his absurdity, that is all I was after.

 

[JSt0rm]

As long as he admitted his absurdity, that is all I was after.

What's absurd is thinking you can eliminate all guns. We are past that point by a long shot. Enjoy your pain and misery.

 

[shortylickens]

As a Canadian I love these threads.


Seems like America still hasn't gotten the memo that nobody can get shot if nobody has a gun.

As a person with a working brain, I love your "logic".

 

[UglyCasanova]

What we don't have a right to Red Dawn in case the Ruskies come?

There's a name I haven't heard in a while, what ever happened to Red Dawn? He married someone off here didn't he? Haven't seen him post in ages.

 

[shortylickens]

There's a name I haven't heard in a while, what ever happened to Red Dawn? He married someone off here didn't he? Haven't seen him post in ages.

he's on Neffers, I think.
And that other site which we cannot name.

 

[Genx87]

What's absurd is thinking you can eliminate all guns. We are past that point by a long shot. Enjoy your pain and misery.

Because example 1084897586th showing prohibition doesnt work.

 

[Enigmoid]

I expected most of this forum to jump on my comment and I was right.

A handgun is designed for the express purpose of hurting/killing another human being. In a society that outlaws assault/murder and disregarding historical precedent why should it be a fundamental right to own such a weapon?

I agree that guns are not the only part of the problem. It is the American attitude toward guns that is the problem (easily seen the the thread where a woman shot an intruder and 95% of the people posting agreed this was 100% justified) and seen in this thread.


Many countries (ignore the 3rd world) with fewer guns and importantly less of a 'gun culture' suffer far far less shooting.

The trend is clear.

That is the impossible part.

And if they didn't have guns they use knives or bats or just throw people out of a window...

Guns rule in terms of effectiveness. If means of violence are readily accessible they will be used.

 

[rudder]

Suck it California!

The only thing I agree with maybe is the reporting of stolen weapons. Lawmakers should focus on harsher sentencing for people who possess firearms illegally or who try to buy firearms illegally. There is an enforcement problem going after people who aren't supposed to buy guns who go out and try to buy them anyway.

And crackdown on morons who leave loaded weapons where they can be picked up by young kids.

Other than that... keep your hands off my guns.