I guess Korea doesn't get much love is because all the weapons are essentially World War 2...I guess it's more fun shooting scripted Nazis than it would be to shoot hordes of Chinese in open ended gameplay...at least that's what the developers would have us believe.
But Korea did have some new weapons introduced en masse. The Chinese had the AK-47, the Americans had new tanks, arty, the M2 Carbine which was an automatic and arguably America's first assault rifle. If Treyarch wanted to get creative they could feature some prototype assault rifles being "tested" in Korea by fabrique nacional (British SAS using STG49s or w/e).
It's just going to be Modern Warfare with a Vietnam skin. There's zero reason for them to shake it up since the way they are is selling so well. I don't need to play the same game 4 times over.
No one has ever done a good Vietnam game (imho)...it will be interesting if they pull it off and stay accurate to how the war went down.
Did you ever play Vietcong? That's the only Vietnam game that captured the mood for me.
qftDid you ever play Vietcong? That's the only Vietnam game that captured the mood for me.
Heh the trailer really didnt do it for me. I was hoping for a realistic accurate depiction of Vietnam.
Then why come in to a Call of Duty thread?
I thought the Vietnam fad was over? BF: Vietnam was not bad, but I think I was one of the few that liked it. Anything with the CoD name will be a mindless nade fest, so I am guessing that at least now they do not have a nade launcher for their M16A1?
Call of Duty 8: Civil War Tactics
The only ones that cost that much are basically console ports.listed for $59.99 at amazon for pre-order now.
This sucks if PC games are going to start costing that much now.