Originally posted by: Gibsons
I don't understand the question.
Originally posted by: f95toli
The idea has been discussed. The problem with a "transplant" is that you (usually) still have either a set of XY or XX chromosomes and no form of surgery can change that . Hence, only changing the "plumbing" won't be enough.
That said, an artitificiall "womb" might eventually become possible and if you combine this with "gene splicing" (or whatever the technical term is) it might eventually become possible for two men or two women to have a child together.
Originally posted by: elpres05
Originally posted by: f95toli
The idea has been discussed. The problem with a "transplant" is that you (usually) still have either a set of XY or XX chromosomes and no form of surgery can change that . Hence, only changing the "plumbing" won't be enough.
That said, an artitificiall "womb" might eventually become possible and if you combine this with "gene splicing" (or whatever the technical term is) it might eventually become possible for two men or two women to have a child together.
and what about a hybrid system ?
What if one body has all the sparkling features, a hybrid system, reproduction on will.
Originally posted by: forrestroche
Originally posted by: elpres05
Originally posted by: f95toli
The idea has been discussed. The problem with a "transplant" is that you (usually) still have either a set of XY or XX chromosomes and no form of surgery can change that . Hence, only changing the "plumbing" won't be enough.
That said, an artitificiall "womb" might eventually become possible and if you combine this with "gene splicing" (or whatever the technical term is) it might eventually become possible for two men or two women to have a child together.
and what about a hybrid system ?
What if one body has all the sparkling features, a hybrid system, reproduction on will.
My guess is hybrid system would be more complicated. But the other posters I suspect are talking out their collective smelly holes. None of them has given a convincing reason that it can't be done (the transplant). If the donor was compatible (a twin sibling would be ideal), why not? The chomosome thing has nothing to do with organ rejection. I think it would work.
Picture it: Your twin sister dies in a horrible accident, leaving only her reproductive organs intact (I will leave it to others to describe this accident in greater detail). Her uterus, vagina, etc. are rushed to the hospital where transplant specialists have already removed your penis and are using a chisel to widen your pelvis-hole (that's the technical term for it). They stuff in the new hardware, hook up blood vessels and (of course) the urethra, shoot you full of hormones, and voila! After a year of physical therapy, constant injections, and round-the-clock counseling (after all, your sis is dead, you scavenged her parts like she was an old subaru, and now you're now a woman) - after all that, now you're ready to find a boyfriend and have a kid! It sounds not only possible, but if you pitch it as a reality one-off to the right producer, I bet you can get it financed tomorrow.
Just my two cents.
Well, I just spent the last day checking into THAT, and I think we can get it done. These reality shows have decent budgets and access to doctors looking to make a name.Originally posted by: Gibsons
Quite another matter to get the ovaries working properly I suspect.
Originally posted by: Gibsons
Originally posted by: forrestroche
Originally posted by: elpres05
Originally posted by: f95toli
The idea has been discussed. The problem with a "transplant" is that you (usually) still have either a set of XY or XX chromosomes and no form of surgery can change that . Hence, only changing the "plumbing" won't be enough.
That said, an artitificiall "womb" might eventually become possible and if you combine this with "gene splicing" (or whatever the technical term is) it might eventually become possible for two men or two women to have a child together.
and what about a hybrid system ?
What if one body has all the sparkling features, a hybrid system, reproduction on will.
My guess is hybrid system would be more complicated. But the other posters I suspect are talking out their collective smelly holes. None of them has given a convincing reason that it can't be done (the transplant). If the donor was compatible (a twin sibling would be ideal), why not? The chomosome thing has nothing to do with organ rejection. I think it would work.
Picture it: Your twin sister dies in a horrible accident, leaving only her reproductive organs intact (I will leave it to others to describe this accident in greater detail). Her uterus, vagina, etc. are rushed to the hospital where transplant specialists have already removed your penis and are using a chisel to widen your pelvis-hole (that's the technical term for it). They stuff in the new hardware, hook up blood vessels and (of course) the urethra, shoot you full of hormones, and voila! After a year of physical therapy, constant injections, and round-the-clock counseling (after all, your sis is dead, you scavenged her parts like she was an old subaru, and now you're now a woman) - after all that, now you're ready to find a boyfriend and have a kid! It sounds not only possible, but if you pitch it as a reality one-off to the right producer, I bet you can get it financed tomorrow.
Just my two cents.
Quite another matter to get the ovaries working properly I suspect.
Originally posted by: forrestroche
Originally posted by: elpres05
Originally posted by: f95toli
The idea has been discussed. The problem with a "transplant" is that you (usually) still have either a set of XY or XX chromosomes and no form of surgery can change that . Hence, only changing the "plumbing" won't be enough.
That said, an artitificiall "womb" might eventually become possible and if you combine this with "gene splicing" (or whatever the technical term is) it might eventually become possible for two men or two women to have a child together.
and what about a hybrid system ?
What if one body has all the sparkling features, a hybrid system, reproduction on will.
My guess is hybrid system would be more complicated. But the other posters I suspect are talking out their collective smelly holes. None of them has given a convincing reason that it can't be done (the transplant). If the donor was compatible (a twin sibling would be ideal), why not? The chomosome thing has nothing to do with organ rejection. I think it would work.
Picture it: Your twin sister dies in a horrible accident, leaving only her reproductive organs intact (I will leave it to others to describe this accident in greater detail). Her uterus, vagina, etc. are rushed to the hospital where transplant specialists have already removed your penis and are using a chisel to widen your pelvis-hole (that's the technical term for it). They stuff in the new hardware, hook up blood vessels and (of course) the urethra, shoot you full of hormones, and voila! After a year of physical therapy, constant injections, and round-the-clock counseling (after all, your sis is dead, you scavenged her parts like she was an old subaru, and now you're now a woman) - after all that, now you're ready to find a boyfriend and have a kid! It sounds not only possible, but if you pitch it as a reality one-off to the right producer, I bet you can get it financed tomorrow.
Just my two cents.
Oogenesis is something we don't understand all that well. Currently when we artificially induce ovulation, it's sort of like making your car go by ramming a train into it. Okay, really bad analogy, but our current methods seem pretty crude to me. Fertility drugs frequently causing multiple births (quintuplets, etc) as an example. So, you place some ovaries in a male, you can keep them alive, I suspect, with lots of hormone inections. But getting them ovulate properly might prove to be more delicate (not just in hormones, but maybe some other things we don't even know about yet) than we're capable of at this point. Just IMO of course.Originally posted by: DrPizza
Originally posted by: Gibsons
Quite another matter to get the ovaries working properly I suspect.
Why's that?
Originally posted by: forrestroche
My guess is hybrid system would be more complicated. But the other posters I suspect are talking out their collective smelly holes. None of them has given a convincing reason that it can't be done (the transplant). If the donor was compatible (a twin sibling would be ideal), why not? The chomosome thing has nothing to do with organ rejection. I think it would work.
Picture it: Your twin sister dies in a horrible accident, leaving only her reproductive organs intact (I will leave it to others to describe this accident in greater detail). Her uterus, vagina, etc. are rushed to the hospital where transplant specialists have already removed your penis and are using a chisel to widen your pelvis-hole (that's the technical term for it). They stuff in the new hardware, hook up blood vessels and (of course) the urethra, shoot you full of hormones, and voila! After a year of physical therapy, constant injections, and round-the-clock counseling (after all, your sis is dead, you scavenged her parts like she was an old subaru, and now you're now a woman) - after all that, now you're ready to find a boyfriend and have a kid! It sounds not only possible, but if you pitch it as a reality one-off to the right producer, I bet you can get it financed tomorrow.
Just my two cents.
Your pelvis-hole (that's the technical term for it)
Oogenesis is something we don't understand all that well. Currently when we artificially induce ovulation, it's sort of like making your car go by ramming a train into it. Okay, really bad analogy, but our current methods seem pretty crude to me. Fertility drugs frequently causing multiple births (quintuplets, etc) as an example. So, you place some ovaries in a male, you can keep them alive, I suspect, with lots of hormone inections. But getting them ovulate properly might prove to be more delicate (not just in hormones, but maybe some other things we don't even know about yet) than we're capable of at this point. Just IMO of course.