you roll your eyes at mw3 but bf3 is just the same thing with new skins...
i don't don't understand how you can either be so blind or hypocritical, other than you are a fanboy.
and you're gonna come back and call me a mw3 fanboy so i'll head that off now and say that i would be posting this whether it was mw3 and bf3 or C&C 12 vs WC12 or Diablo 4 vs. Torchlight 4
Have you played bf2 and BC2? Then you'd know the battlefield series has completely changed over the past 5 or 6 years. The introduction of CoD4 into the market completely changed to dynamic of every FPS since, and it would be asinine to compare bf2 to bf3 as a reskin, partially because of the impact CoD4 has upon the FPS genre.
This has manifested itself differently for the CoD series however. The success of the CoD4 archtype of FPS has led the dev team to reuse the exact same formula since the release of CoD4, while adding a small variety of new features and graphics. CoD4 was a major shift which the rest of the industry, including the battlefield franchise has followed. It would be hard to argue that, but the CoD franchise doesn't seem to understand that remaining attached to a stagnating formula for every single release is exactly the opposite of the revolutionary steps they took with CoD4 through which they took the market by storm.
Oh and ponti my man, you really seem to want me to disagree with you, i mean, you even said that treyarch CoD games were the better ones... lol bro, it's times like this that make it hard to take you seriously... you know about the whole IW/Activision lawsuit thing right? Plus sledgehammer? Open your eyes =D
...are you allergic to genre defining games?
oh and OP -
BF3 no contest, at all.