Thebobo
Lifer
- Jun 19, 2006
- 18,592
- 7,673
- 136
College newspaper opinion piece is where you get your facts? Looks like you are searching for facts that agree with your preconceived notions.
The problem with players kneeling during the anthem is simple: it is an example of black people protesting. Every time black people protest something they are told that the problem isn’t with them protesting, it’s how they are protesting. The thing is, that’s said no matter how they protest. It’s hard to imagine a more totally benign form of protest than kneeling during the anthem at a sporting event and yet even then, conservatives freak out.
I would love to hear where and how would be an acceptable place and manner for black people to protest. If we get any answers at all I bet it will be ‘quietly and out of the public eye so you can safely be ignored’.
We already have an answer: they can protest off the field, back in the locker room. Out of site, out of mind. Black people protesting aren't to be heard or seen.
Stop being obtuse idiot. NFL is 70% black. Besides your people made up the rule 1/8 equals black so fuck off.I didn't realize it was just black players kneeling and protesting.
It's sop for the liberals to start screaming racist when they can't convince people to agree with them. Usually doesn't take long.
Good job!
Stop being obtuse idiot. NFL is 70% black. Besides your people made up the rule 1/8 equals black so fuck off.
Stop being obtuse idiot. NFL is 70% black. Besides your people made up the rule 1/8 equals black so fuck off.
NFL is 70% black
You don't protest when it's 'convenient.' You protest when it will have maximum effect.
And if we measure this protest by it maximum effort, I would says its final outcome is EPIC FAILURE. It accomplished absolutely 0 that it was supposed to, and riled up the people anti to its cause.
if you want to gain favor and persuade, you need to attract more people than you provoke. Hint: the most controversial confrontational way is usually NOT the best.
And if we measure this protest by it maximum effort, I would says its final outcome is EPIC FAILURE. It accomplished absolutely 0 that it was supposed to, and riled up the people anti to its cause.
if you want to gain favor and persuade, you need to attract more people than you provoke. Hint: the most controversial confrontational way is usually NOT the best.
Kneeling for the national anthem is confrontational? If you ever saw an actual protest your pearls would shatter.And if we measure this protest by it maximum effort, I would says its final outcome is EPIC FAILURE. It accomplished absolutely 0 that it was supposed to, and riled up the people anti to its cause.
if you want to gain favor and persuade, you need to attract more people than you provoke. Hint: the most controversial confrontational way is usually NOT the best.
And if we measure this protest by it maximum effort, I would says its final outcome is EPIC FAILURE. It accomplished absolutely 0 that it was supposed to, and riled up the people anti to its cause.
if you want to gain favor and persuade, you need to attract more people than you provoke. Hint: the most controversial confrontational way is usually NOT the best.
And if we measure this protest by it maximum effort, I would says its final outcome is EPIC FAILURE. It accomplished absolutely 0 that it was supposed to, and riled up the people anti to its cause.
if you want to gain favor and persuade, you need to attract more people than you provoke. Hint: the most controversial confrontational way is usually NOT the best.
Yes you white guys made up that rule. Try reading a history bookTriggered TDS suffering ******************************. "1/8 equals black"?
Good job!
Don't worry the white contingent amongst ownership and coaches more then make that up.Sounds like it could use some hiring quotas to restore parity in representation.
You’re partially wrong as well. The BLM movement did force a necessary conversation. Very few people are criticizing NBA players or soccer players or other people in a position to elevate that message through their celebrity. All the things you mentioned were already in motion independent of the NFL conversation.Too bad you're wrong. Body cameras are more commonplace; officers have been fired who would previously have skirted the law; police accountability as a whole is up, even if there's a lot of work left to do.
And more importantly, it keeps the topic in the conversation. You want black people to go protest quietly in a corner where you won't have to be confronted with their ideas. But hey, guess what -- you're talking about the subject, aren't you? Mission accomplished.
It's only confrontational because people are brainwashed by Trump to think that. This is the same Trump who didn't mind crotch grabbing and spitting during the National Anthem. Doesn't mind using the flag as clothing.And if we measure this protest by it maximum effort, I would says its final outcome is EPIC FAILURE. It accomplished absolutely 0 that it was supposed to, and riled up the people anti to its cause.
if you want to gain favor and persuade, you need to attract more people than you provoke. Hint: the most controversial confrontational way is usually NOT the best.
It's only confrontational because people are brainwashed by Trump to think that. This is the same Trump who didn't mind crotch grabbing and spitting during the National Anthem. Doesn't mind using the flag as clothing.
You know what the word "should" means when written in law? Diddly ÷ squat.No... its confrontational and offensive because I was taught in my 7th grade history class by a veteran what the law says about the National Anthem. Intentionally kneeling during the national anthem is a blatent show of disrespect for the country. They cant fathom why the nation is more important than any one individual. They don't actually Pledge their allegience to this nation, they dont believe in patriotism. They only pledge allegiance to themselves.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/36/301
36 U.S. Code § 301 - National anthem
prev | next
(a)Designation.—
The composition consisting of the words and music known as the Star-Spangled Banner is the national anthem.
(b)Conduct During Playing.—During a rendition of the national anthem—
(1)when the flag is displayed—
(A)
individuals in uniform should give the military salute at the first note of the anthem and maintain that position until the last note;
(B)
members of the Armed Forces and veterans who are present but not in uniform may render the military salute in the manner provided for individuals in uniform; and
(C)
all other persons present should face the flag and stand at attention with their right hand over the heart, and men not in uniform, if applicable, should remove their headdress with their right hand and hold it at the left shoulder, the hand being over the heart; and
(2)
when the flag is not displayed, all present should face toward the music and act in the same manner they would if the flag were display
You do realize that if the government ever tried to enforce this statist horseshit, everything not related to current members of the military would be thrown out as violation of freedom of expression?No... its confrontational and offensive because I was taught in my 7th grade history class by a veteran what the law says about the National Anthem. Intentionally kneeling during the national anthem is a blatent show of disrespect for the country. They cant fathom why the nation is more important than any one individual. They don't actually Pledge their allegience to this nation, they dont believe in patriotism. They only pledge allegiance to themselves.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/36/301
36 U.S. Code § 301 - National anthem
prev | next
(a)Designation.—
The composition consisting of the words and music known as the Star-Spangled Banner is the national anthem.
(b)Conduct During Playing.—During a rendition of the national anthem—
(1)when the flag is displayed—
(A)
individuals in uniform should give the military salute at the first note of the anthem and maintain that position until the last note;
(B)
members of the Armed Forces and veterans who are present but not in uniform may render the military salute in the manner provided for individuals in uniform; and
(C)
all other persons present should face the flag and stand at attention with their right hand over the heart, and men not in uniform, if applicable, should remove their headdress with their right hand and hold it at the left shoulder, the hand being over the heart; and
(2)
when the flag is not displayed, all present should face toward the music and act in the same manner they would if the flag were display
You do realize that if the government ever tried to enforce this statist horseshit, everything not related to current members of the military would be thrown out as violation of freedom of expression?