- Dec 6, 2009
- 1,061
- 0
- 0
Legitimacy?
What facts do you want to check?
The most legitimate source is HL Review archives. Search for yourself.
Legitimacy?
Thanks for wasting the time to find a photo.
What facts do you want to check?
The most legitimate source is HL Review archives. Search for yourself.
Again. Please show me any other presidents college transcripts in history that they released, freely, of their own free will.
Then explain why Obama should have to release his.
You're going to just make it worse by keeping this thread going.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/05/25/obama_is_not_that_bright_114271.html
And opinion piece. Not a realclearpolitics piece.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Did_Barack_Obama_publish_in_the_Harvard_law_review
Wiki answers? C'mon. You mean a place anyone can post an answer? And the guy who posted the "answer" has a blank profile. Not a credential in sight.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/01/now_we_know_who_was_right_about_obama.html
Americanthinker. We just had a discussion about this site. About the same as World Net Daily
http://theobamahustle.wordpress.com/tag/law-review/
This is a blog anyone can set up.
Clearly your an Obama fan.
Republican opinion piece.
Undermines your premise.
Even less credible than Wing Nut Daily.
Random dude's poorly formatted blog.
\shine on....
why is everyone trying so hard to vet romney when obama has never been properly vetted.
I'm listening if anyone can point me to any articles he has written other than the one that "mysteriously turned up" which dates 1990 but has no official signature on it.
If anyone can post any of the articles he has written aside from that one, I'm all eyes.
I'm listening if anyone can point me to any articles he has written other than the one that "mysteriously turned up" which dates 1990 but has no official signature on it.
If anyone can post any of the articles he has written aside from that one, I'm all eyes.
Do you understand the difference between an editor and a writer, yes?
Further to that what the purpose of the editor of the Harvard law review really is.
I like this one. He's a special kind of stupid.
Republican opinion piece.
Undermines your premise.
Even less credible than Wing Nut Daily.
Random dude's poorly formatted blog.
I was getting more of a "Comfortably Numb" vibe but that works too.
He was editor as a 2L and president as a 3L.
He was President. How do you become and editor or president without writing articles?
Show me the articles folks.
You really don't know what the Harvard law review is, and what they do, do you?
I'm listening if anyone can point me to any articles he has written other than the one that "mysteriously turned up" which dates 1990 but has no official signature on it.
If anyone can post any of the articles he has written aside from that one, I'm all eyes.
So are you now saying that I am correct, Obama didn't write anything? No notes, no articles?
Because before you were saying he did.
And which of those would be less reputable than Harry Reid's "some guy at bain" source on Romney's taxes?
Can you point me in the direction of articles written by the last five Harvard Law Review presidents? Do HLR presidents normally write reviews or articles? How many?
If you had done the barest research you would find out that Obama was virtually drafted to run for the Presidency of the law review. At that time there was a lot of hostility between the right and left wing at the Review. Obama was respected as someone who could work with all people and was a good mediator. People from both sides have written that Obama saw his job as President to essentially manage the competing factions with a sense of fairness. And by all accounts did a good job.
Obama didn't get elected because he was President of the law review so your entire thread point is moot.
So are you now saying that I am correct, Obama didn't write anything? No notes, no articles?
Because before you were saying he did.
And which of those would be less reputable than Harry Reid's "some guy at bain" source on Romney's taxes?