Can someone finally vet him please?

[fantolay]

Legitimacy?

What facts do you want to check?

The most legitimate source is HL Review archives. Search for yourself.

 

[fantolay]

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/05/25/obama_is_not_that_bright_114271.html
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Did_Barack_Obama_publish_in_the_Harvard_law_review
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/01/now_we_know_who_was_right_about_obama.html
http://theobamahustle.wordpress.com/tag/law-review/

 

[techs]

Thanks for wasting the time to find a photo.

Here's a real fact. World Net Daily is probably THE most infamous site posted in this forum. No one tries to defend its use as a source. Even extreme right wingers are doing a facepalm when you posted it as a factual source.

You are proceding from a false assumption that you have posted any kind of factual info.

You're going to just make it worse by keeping this thread going.

 

[MomentsofSanity]

What facts do you want to check?

The most legitimate source is HL Review archives. Search for yourself.

Again. Please show me any other presidents college transcripts in history that they released, freely, of their own free will.

Then explain why Obama should have to release his.

 

[fantolay]

I'm done here.

BTW Liberals, look at the great job he has done so far!

Bye now.

 

[fantolay]

Again. Please show me any other presidents college transcripts in history that they released, freely, of their own free will.

Then explain why Obama should have to release his.

First lets talk about how he didn't do anything while on the law review.

 

[UberNeuman]

You're going to just make it worse by keeping this thread going.

Ssshhh..... Let this lone warrior of truth bring forth that which none have dared to expose...

\shine on....

 

[techs]

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/05/25/obama_is_not_that_bright_114271.html
And opinion piece. Not a realclearpolitics piece.

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Did_Barack_Obama_publish_in_the_Harvard_law_review
Wiki answers? C'mon. You mean a place anyone can post an answer? And the guy who posted the "answer" has a blank profile. Not a credential in sight.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/01/now_we_know_who_was_right_about_obama.html
Americanthinker. We just had a discussion about this site. About the same as World Net Daily
http://theobamahustle.wordpress.com/tag/law-review/
This is a blog anyone can set up.

You are actually hurting your case. You are taking a propaganda piece that has been repeated by bloggers and other disreputable sites and seem to making a case that it must be true because it has been copied by other sites.

 

[Lemon law]

Clearly your an Obama fan.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ok OK fanalay, clearly you are not an Obama fan. So please tell us fantolay why your negative opinion of Obama should be more important than my decidedly negative opinion
of Romney?

Truth be told I do not have a high opinion of either Romney or Obama, or any
any Fibertarian alternative, but when it comes to a lesser of all evils I will
hold my nose and vote Obama.

 

[Abraxas]

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/05/25/obama_is_not_that_bright_114271.html

Republican opinion piece.

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Did_Barack_Obama_publish_in_the_Harvard_law_review

Undermines your premise.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/01/now_we_know_who_was_right_about_obama.html

Even less credible than Wing Nut Daily.

http://theobamahustle.wordpress.com/tag/law-review/

Random dude's poorly formatted blog.

\shine on....

I was getting more of a "Comfortably Numb" vibe but that works too.

 

[umbrella39]

why is everyone trying so hard to vet romney when obama has never been properly vetted.

100% bs. Gyhooya

 

[fantolay]

I'm listening if anyone can point me to any articles he has written other than the one that "mysteriously turned up" which dates 1990 but has no official signature on it.

If anyone can post any of the articles he has written aside from that one, I'm all eyes.

 

[Abraxas]

I'm listening if anyone can point me to any articles he has written other than the one that "mysteriously turned up" which dates 1990 but has no official signature on it.

If anyone can post any of the articles he has written aside from that one, I'm all eyes.

Do you understand the difference between an editor and a writer, yes?

 

[CitizenKain]

I'm listening if anyone can point me to any articles he has written other than the one that "mysteriously turned up" which dates 1990 but has no official signature on it.

If anyone can post any of the articles he has written aside from that one, I'm all eyes.

Birther spotted. Like you'd believe any article you'd see. Well, ones that didn't come from a racist blog and from crazy people.

 

[MomentsofSanity]

Do you understand the difference between an editor and a writer, yes?

Further to that what the purpose of the editor of the Harvard law review really is.

I like this one. He's a special kind of stupid.

 

[fantolay]

Further to that what the purpose of the editor of the Harvard law review really is.

I like this one. He's a special kind of stupid.

He was editor as a 2L and president as a 3L.

He was President. How do you become and editor or president without writing articles?

Show me the articles folks.

 

[nehalem256]

Republican opinion piece.
Undermines your premise.
Even less credible than Wing Nut Daily.

Random dude's poorly formatted blog.



I was getting more of a "Comfortably Numb" vibe but that works too.

And which of those would be less reputable than Harry Reid's "some guy at bain" source on Romney's taxes?

 

[MomentsofSanity]

He was editor as a 2L and president as a 3L.

He was President. How do you become and editor or president without writing articles?

Show me the articles folks.

You really don't know what the Harvard law review is, and what they do, do you?

 

[fantolay]

You really don't know what the Harvard law review is, and what they do, do you?

So are you now saying that I am correct, Obama didn't write anything? No notes, no articles?

Because before you were saying he did.

 

[techs]

I'm listening if anyone can point me to any articles he has written other than the one that "mysteriously turned up" which dates 1990 but has no official signature on it.

If anyone can post any of the articles he has written aside from that one, I'm all eyes.

Can you point me in the direction of articles written by the last five Harvard Law Review presidents? Do HLR presidents normally write reviews or articles? How many?

If you had done the barest research you would find out that Obama was virtually drafted to run for the Presidency of the law review. At that time there was a lot of hostility between the right and left wing at the Review. Obama was respected as someone who could work with all people and was a good mediator. People from both sides have written that Obama saw his job as President to essentially manage the competing factions with a sense of fairness. And by all accounts did a good job.

Obama didn't get elected because he was President of the law review so your entire thread point is moot.

 

[MomentsofSanity]

So are you now saying that I am correct, Obama didn't write anything? No notes, no articles?

Because before you were saying he did.

I said no such thing. But I believe you think I did. It's evident you and reality have a very distant relationship.

What I am saying is your entire premise is flawed in that it does not support your claim.

 

[UberNeuman]

And which of those would be less reputable than Harry Reid's "some guy at bain" source on Romney's taxes?

"Would you be more likely or less likely to vote for John McCain if you knew that he fathered an illegitimate black child?".

 

[fantolay]

Can you point me in the direction of articles written by the last five Harvard Law Review presidents? Do HLR presidents normally write reviews or articles? How many?

If you had done the barest research you would find out that Obama was virtually drafted to run for the Presidency of the law review. At that time there was a lot of hostility between the right and left wing at the Review. Obama was respected as someone who could work with all people and was a good mediator. People from both sides have written that Obama saw his job as President to essentially manage the competing factions with a sense of fairness. And by all accounts did a good job.

Obama didn't get elected because he was President of the law review so your entire thread point is moot.

Romney 2012

 

[techs]

So are you now saying that I am correct, Obama didn't write anything? No notes, no articles?

Because before you were saying he did.

I have to hand it to you. You got seriously pwned in this thread and yet you keep coming back to get pwned again and again.

Basically you are a great example of how someone can be wrong, have it pointed out to them unequivicably numerous times, and yet just keep going on like they are right and the facts don't matter.

You sir, are the truest form of the right wing wacko wingnut. My hat is off to you.

 

[Abraxas]

And which of those would be less reputable than Harry Reid's "some guy at bain" source on Romney's taxes?

All of them, actually. The testimony of a Senator carries a bit more weight than four random angry people on the internet. That said, you aren't setting the bar very high.