Originally posted by: DJFuji
That has to be the most descriptive and concise description of the 1-10 scale i've ever seen. It's also very similar to the scale i personally use. I go by something along the lines of:
1-4: varying degrees of unattractive
5: plain/avg
6-kinda cute
7-cute
8-hot
9-unbelievably hot
10- unbelievably hot + unattainable
Unfortunately, the rest of the world doesn't use it. Everyone else kind of goes along this scale:
1-5: ugly
6: mildly ugly
7-ok
8-attractive
9-attractive + likes you
10-hot
Thus, the huge number of "10s" everyone seems to be dating. In our definition of a "10", you might see ONE, or very rarely TWO, in a hot club in a major city once in a while. You certainly don't see them on a daily basis the way most people talk. The problem with the "everyone's a 10" scale is that it's incredibly difficult to differentiate a "cute" girl from a "bombshell" because youre giving both of them a "10".
All that being said, the answer to the OP's question is "no."
Nigel Tufnel: [pointing to a customized Marshall amplifier head unit] This is a top, to, uh, you know, what we use on stage, but it's very, very special, because, if you can see...
Marty DiBergi: Yeah...
Nigel Tufnel: [pointing to the control dials] ...the numbers all go to eleven. Look, right across the board: eleven, eleven, eleven, eleven...
Marty DiBergi: Oh, I see. And most amps go up to ten?
Nigel Tufnel: Exactly.
Marty DiBergi: Does that mean it's louder? Is that any louder?
Nigel Tufnel: Well, it's one louder, isn't it? It's not ten. You see, most... most blokes, you know, will be playing at ten. You're on ten here, all the way up, all the way up, all the way up... you're on ten on your guitar. Where can you go from there? Where?
Marty DiBergi: I don't know...
Nigel Tufnel: ...nowhere! Exactly! What we do is if we need that extra... push over the cliff, you know what we do?
Marty DiBergi: Put it up to eleven.
Nigel Tufnel: ...Eleven. Exactly. One louder.
Marty DiBergi: Why don't you just make ten louder, and make ten be the top... number, and make that a little louder?
Nigel Tufnel: [pause, blank look and snapping chewing gum] These go to eleven.
Originally posted by: dug777
To be honest, there's something wrong with this thread.
While have a vague handle on the OP's comment, this is something that i though the OP was keen to avoid,
<cut>
Originally posted by: scott
HotChic, your rating of your SO seems to be missing from your OP.
Please fill us in?
Originally posted by: HotChic
Originally posted by: scott
HotChic, your rating of your SO seems to be missing from your OP.
Please fill us in?
My S.O. is a forums member and the likelihood is that your S.O. is not. He's a perfect 10 for me.
Can I objectively rate him? No, probably not.
Originally posted by: scott
Originally posted by: dug777
To be honest, there's something wrong with this thread.
While have a vague handle on the OP's comment, this is something that i though the OP was keen to avoid,
<cut>
well that's what I was thinking too.
It just seems like, as a general thing, when an OP asks people to divulge things about themselves, that they would start it off by going first.
This OP contributes a lot of good thread topics though so I'm definitely not intending any criticism or anything. Just sounding off with an opinion, that's all, that generally a person who asks others for self-disclosures would reveal their own info first, that's all. :wine:
Originally posted by: moshquerade
<blockquote>quote:
Originally posted by: tfinch2
10
http://www.pbase.com/travisfinch/image/63791410
Am I skewed? </blockquote>
is that you?
http://www.pbase.com/image/57485687
Originally posted by: GuideBot
If I could objectively rate them, they wouldn't be my SO.
Originally posted by: RandomFool
Yes. She's a 10000000/10.
Originally posted by: TallBill
I honestly think that my wife is a 10 on the physical scale. I am very very attracted to her. She's also amazingly fun to be with, hence the marriage.