Canada's air force was slashed in size by 50% yesterday

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
I'm glad our government spends money on healthcare rather than the military. IMO the US should do the same.
 

alphatarget1

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2001
5,710
0
76
I'm glad our government spends money on healthcare rather than the military. IMO the US should do the same.

Yeah, right.... Without the US military you Canucks would be spending a hell of a lot more to protect yourselves against the Russians.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Yeah, right.... Without the US military you Canucks would be spending a hell of a lot more to protect yourselves against the Russians.
This is possibly true. I believe Russia invades Canada's air space constantly and then is "escorted" back by a fighter or two. And, all jokes aside, a fighter or two is a pretty substantial percentage of Canada's air force which is basically an air force in name only. It has very few actual combat-ready fighters.
 

alphatarget1

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2001
5,710
0
76
This is possibly true. I believe Russia invades Canada's air space constantly and then is "escorted" back by a fighter or two. And, all jokes aside, a fighter or two is a pretty substantial percentage of Canada's air force which is basically an air force in name only. It has very few actual combat-ready fighters.

hehe.

Not to derail the thread, but I don't understand why Obama is trying to cozy up with the Russians. Nobody likes them. Ask any of our allies in the former Warsaw pact countries, they all hate the Russians because they were essentially fucked by Russia for centuries. Same for Canada. Russia wants to take the entire Arctic. Are Canadians ready to defend their national interests from Russian aggression?

EDIT: TO keep this thread on topic... I'm glad the pilot is okay.
 
Last edited:

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,591
5
0
Canada better be careful with their existing fighter(s). The F35 is not anywhere near production yet.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,145
10
81
hehe.

Not to derail the thread, but I don't understand why Obama is trying to cozy up with the Russians. Nobody likes them. Ask any of our allies in the former Warsaw pact countries, they all hate the Russians because they were essentially fucked by Russia for centuries. Same for Canada. Russia wants to take the entire Arctic. Are Canadians ready to defend their national interests from Russian aggression?

EDIT: TO keep this thread on topic... I'm glad the pilot is okay.

glad the pilot is ok.

I wouldn't trust Russia at all. they want to take over all over the artic. I think that's where the next big conflict area.
 

Number1

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
7,881
549
126
Obviously not many people in here have any idea of the size of our Air Force. Here some information about our fighters.

From Wiki
"In 1980, the McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet was declared the winner of the New Fighter Aircraft competition. The order included 98 single-seat variants and 40 dual-seat variants, for a total of 138 purchased, plus 20 options (which were not exercised)."

Cost per fighters was $35 millions originaly.

"Current strength: 72 CF-18As and 31 CF-18Bs in inventory as of November 2008.[35] 80 in operational use."

We have ordered 65 new F35 fighters at a cost of about 120 millions each and they should enter service around 2017. The Liberals have vowed to stop the project if they get elected.
 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
Obviously not many people in here have any idea of the size of our Air Force. Here some information about our fighters.

From Wiki
"In 1980, the McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet was declared the winner of the New Fighter Aircraft competition. The order included 98 single-seat variants and 40 dual-seat variants, for a total of 138 purchased, plus 20 options (which were not exercised)."

Cost per fighters was $35 millions originaly.

"Current strength: 72 CF-18As and 31 CF-18Bs in inventory as of November 2008.[35] 80 in operational use."

We have ordered 65 new F35 fighters at a cost of about 120 millions each and they should enter service around 2017. The Liberals have vowed to stop the project if they get elected.

And 2 F22s can shoot down the whole air force

(disclaimer: as long as canadians dont have rain or cell phones)
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
This is possibly true. I believe Russia invades Canada's air space constantly and then is "escorted" back by a fighter or two. And, all jokes aside, a fighter or two is a pretty substantial percentage of Canada's air force which is basically an air force in name only. It has very few actual combat-ready fighters.

Not in a while. The U.S.S.R. used to routinely send nuclear-capable bombers over the Arctic circle to test NORAD's reflexes but they haven't been a credible threat in some time.

Canada has an air force?

We do too, sort of! Though the funny thing is we really are going to cut its size in half in the next ten years - we'll go from 130-odd F/A-18 Hornets to about 60 F-35s.

I still think we should sell off all of our heavy land-based equipment and turn into a 100&#37; paratrooper force with a stated mission of going in fast and first. I think the U.S. was getting somewhere with their light (enough to be dropped by chute) tank technology, and it's only a quick reaction force that'd be any good for the defence of Canada.

Edit: Just saw the video, ouch. Bet that wasn't a soft landing for the pilot.
 

Kntx

Platinum Member
Dec 11, 2000
2,270
0
71
Conspiracy theory. The canadian government just announces purchase of new advanced fighter planes. All signs point to a political battle over the contract. 1 week later an existing plane crashes. The crash offers political points to the government which of course supports the contract. Who could be against the new planeswhen the existing ones fall from the sky and put the brave pilots in danger?
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
Conspiracy theory. The canadian government just announces purchase of new advanced fighter planes. All signs point to a political battle over the contract. 1 week later an existing plane crashes. The crash offers political points to the government which of course supports the contract. Who could be against the new planeswhen the existing ones fall from the sky and put the brave pilots in danger?

Yeah, the Official Opposition is playing the same old game that put the screws to the military two decades ago:

Mr. Ignatieff no doubt recalls that his predecessor Jean Chrétien made much political hay during the 1993 election by characterizing the Mulroney government's $4.8-billion contract for EH-101 helicopters as a “Cadillac” deal.

While this may have been a winning election strategy, the subsequent cancellation of this deal cost Canadian taxpayers $500-million in penalties and delayed a very necessary purchase. Seventeen years later, we're still waiting for those replacement helicopters.
 

Dominato3r

Diamond Member
Aug 15, 2008
5,114
1
0
It's high time we absorbed this damn country already, lol.

Hey, that's not nice. I thought we were friends?

I think Harper is actually doing well in terms of the military. He has been purchasing a lot of new and better equipment, and that must be a huge morale boost.
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
When are we going to send Canada a bill for all the defense we're providing them?
 

drebo

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
7,035
1
81
I'm glad our government spends money on healthcare rather than the military. IMO the US should do the same.

No, the US doesn't need to spend more money on anything (except maybe education, but that's at the state level). They do, however, need to spend less money on almost everything, including the military.
 

Kntx

Platinum Member
Dec 11, 2000
2,270
0
71

I don't quite see the 1993 helicopter debacle the same as the situation today with the planes. The helicopter cuts were part of a larger austerity strategy put forth by the liberals to bring the deficit under control. Also, I believe (could be wrong) that the helicopter purchase was much further along in the procurement process at that time than the plane purchase of today. In fact the point put forth by the opposition is not that the military doesn't need or won't get new planes, the issue is that there was no competitive bid process at all.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |