You run from discussion and resort to name calling and dismissal of discussion when ineptly frustrated. Cbrunny is moticated to abuse this forum as his personal bubble, and shield himself from relevant discussion.I'm not interested in hearing what some guy on the internet says is the truth.
Me preaching? No, I am discussing, recognizing, directly quoting, and responding with topical substance. Cbrunny, alone is guilty of "preaching" and stumping this thread by choosing a position to post without visible challenge in his blacklisting and filtering out the majority of advancing posts in this thread. In his enforced echo chamber, cbrunning has shat on his own thread.I'm interested in having a conversation about what the issue actually is. There's a differencebetween preaching - as you are doing - and discussing to reach a consensus, or not reach a consensus.
With substance, my positions are proving to be correct. Cbrunny can't handle a discussion where fault is found in arguments. Cbrunny is flat outwrong in his denial of this court case not having a bearing on this election "without criminal conviction upon Duffy".... He is in error to use the CPC line that this trial is effectively about Duffy rather than the greater concerns of trust in Harper and his great leader personality cult upon the yes men Conservative Party of Canada.You've pigeonholed anyone who disagrees with you, has a different perspective than you, or even PRIORITIZES issues differently than you do, as a damn fool. Think about that. Really. Think about it.
Cbrunny is in gross error to place me on an ignore list when he could not handle an analysis that small 'c' Conservatives are reacting in concern to the contradictions and lack of integrity by Harper and the PMO... I wrote:
That concurs with polls and press analyses out today :This is an election where change in national support by a single percentage point can determine the next government. A portion of CPC supporters are on record for questioning Harper and of likely forgoing a vote for the CPC. Issues such as this have and can cost elections for the incumbent.
I already referred to small 'c' Conservatives, yet for whatever partisan stance you [cbrunny] have, you've dismissed a decent portion of the moderate Canadian electorate as inconsequential.
cbrunny grossly errors in dismissing other members posts in his own thread upon the federal election, and he is in gross irrationality to discount analyses that are proving out to be accurate and correct.Poll Tracker: Conservative swing voters could drift because of Duffy trial
What is more ominous for the Tories is that a significant proportion of soft Conservative supporters — people who are currently considering voting for the party but have not yet committed — are looking at Harper's involvement in this affair with doubt.
According to Abacus Data, a quarter of soft Conservative supporters think Harper acted improperly, and one-fifth say the trial has made them less inclined to vote for the party. About one-quarter of these swing voters told Angus Reid they did not believe Harper's story (another 42 per cent said they did not know if they believed Harper or not), and just under one-third said it had worsened their opinion of him. In a tight three-way race, that represents a lot of votes the Conservatives can ill afford to lose.
The Conservatives' line on the scandal, that it is limited to Nigel Wright and Mike Duffy, does not carry water with most Canadians. Sixty-one per cent believe it points to a deeper scandal within the Prime Minister's Office, according to Angus Reid. Significantly for the Tories, 23 per cent of soft Conservative supporters believe the same thing.
Last edited: