Captain America: Civil War

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Tidekilla115

Member
Feb 28, 2016
148
0
16
I'm a huge marvel buff and I know a lot about it this is to early to make this movie they havnt introduced enough characters or set the stage for it. The civil war storyline was complicated and slightly confusing. So while I think it will be cool its much too early in the storyline to launch this
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,563
9
81
I have a bad feeling this one is going to suck, much like Spiderman 3 due to the obscene amount of things going on and characters, but...we shall see. If no one dies permanently (besides bucky or other non primary characters), then this movie is pointless and just filler.

Don't characters come back to life in the comics all the time anyway? It's not like death ever means anything. Comics are so convoluted and ridiculous, it's not like a two hour movie could make things any worse.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,810
29,564
146
I'm a huge marvel buff and I know a lot about it this is to early to make this movie they havnt introduced enough characters or set the stage for it. The civil war storyline was complicated and slightly confusing. So while I think it will be cool its much too early in the storyline to launch this

These things can never be at the same scope of the comic books--just way way way too many characters, backstory, details, and bullshit that simply doesn't translate completely to the film medium.

You're essentially making the argument that several years-worth of multiple comic book storylines (some that go back decades) need to somehow be adequately represented in a 2 hour movie run time? or even 3 movies?

lolno.

It will by nature be very different, because they have already been building up the cinematic universe as something semi-representative but very dilute compared to the comic universe. You shouldn't take these as direct adaptations; as you shouldn't take any novel-to-film adaptation of any content.

It's also a very different audience. You aren't going to see Silver Surfer or Adam Warlock or the real Thanos represented to the LSD-infused complexity that they were in the old Jim Starlin days. Hell, they had to neuter and dumb down the Infinity Gauntlet into some toyish nonsense that will actually allow the Avengers to compete? Bullshit. If this multi-film and multi-year franchise were in any way faithful to that story, it would have begun and ended about 4 years ago: Thanos kills a bunch of people, steals their Infinity Gems...then snaps his fingers and half the universe perishes. ....that is the first comic in that series. The Avengers and various normal superheros (Even Thor, who is considered "a god") were sent up simply as a first wave cannon fodder, and that's exactly what happened.

It's already a joke and going to be a bigger joke in comparison. That, and just throwing in the hokey Celestial beings is just very weird for this type of audience. Are we going to see Celestial Titans recruiting entire systems of planets just to smash them one by one into Thanos in a futile attempt to stop him?

no.
 

Skel

Diamond Member
Apr 11, 2001
6,218
661
136
These things can never be at the same scope of the comic books--just way way way too many characters, backstory, details, and bullshit that simply doesn't translate completely to the film medium.

You're essentially making the argument that several years-worth of multiple comic book storylines (some that go back decades) need to somehow be adequately represented in a 2 hour movie run time? or even 3 movies?

lolno.

It will by nature be very different, because they have already been building up the cinematic universe as something semi-representative but very dilute compared to the comic universe. You shouldn't take these as direct adaptations; as you shouldn't take any novel-to-film adaptation of any content.

It's also a very different audience. You aren't going to see Silver Surfer or Adam Warlock or the real Thanos represented to the LSD-infused complexity that they were in the old Jim Starlin days. Hell, they had to neuter and dumb down the Infinity Gauntlet into some toyish nonsense that will actually allow the Avengers to compete? Bullshit. If this multi-film and multi-year franchise were in any way faithful to that story, it would have begun and ended about 4 years ago: Thanos kills a bunch of people, steals their Infinity Gems...then snaps his fingers and half the universe perishes. ....that is the first comic in that series. The Avengers and various normal superheros (Even Thor, who is considered "a god") were sent up simply as a first wave cannon fodder, and that's exactly what happened.

It's already a joke and going to be a bigger joke in comparison. That, and just throwing in the hokey Celestial beings is just very weird for this type of audience. Are we going to see Celestial Titans recruiting entire systems of planets just to smash them one by one into Thanos in a futile attempt to stop him?

no.

I would pay good money to watch the Celestials take on Thanos like that. The thought of the visuals gives me goose bumps.. and I'm not a FX guy. It's a pity it'll be downgraded to focus more on the Avengers/GotG but maybe there'll be some treats in it.

I also think (and I'm sure I've said it) this movie will be a mess. CW (beyond the pointless stupidity of the books) was a mess due to it's scope. Trying to cram that into 2 hours, even if they try to spread the fallout between the next few movies will be even more of a mess. It really bothers me that we learn nothing from other franchises. Every time the movies attempt to shove too many new characters and stories into a movie the worst it becomes. I can't think of one franchise that has ever worked in.
 

AznAnarchy99

Lifer
Dec 6, 2004
14,705
117
106
I would pay good money to watch the Celestials take on Thanos like that. The thought of the visuals gives me goose bumps.. and I'm not a FX guy. It's a pity it'll be downgraded to focus more on the Avengers/GotG but maybe there'll be some treats in it.

I also think (and I'm sure I've said it) this movie will be a mess. CW (beyond the pointless stupidity of the books) was a mess due to it's scope. Trying to cram that into 2 hours, even if they try to spread the fallout between the next few movies will be even more of a mess. It really bothers me that we learn nothing from other franchises. Every time the movies attempt to shove too many new characters and stories into a movie the worst it becomes. I can't think of one franchise that has ever worked in.

Avengers Part 1?
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,810
29,564
146
I would pay good money to watch the Celestials take on Thanos like that. The thought of the visuals gives me goose bumps.. and I'm not a FX guy. It's a pity it'll be downgraded to focus more on the Avengers/GotG but maybe there'll be some treats in it.

I also think (and I'm sure I've said it) this movie will be a mess. CW (beyond the pointless stupidity of the books) was a mess due to it's scope. Trying to cram that into 2 hours, even if they try to spread the fallout between the next few movies will be even more of a mess. It really bothers me that we learn nothing from other franchises. Every time the movies attempt to shove too many new characters and stories into a movie the worst it becomes. I can't think of one franchise that has ever worked in.

Yeah, for sure. I was being optimistic when looking at this Marvel Roadmap a few years ago. Cramming too much superhero crap into one superhero movie was always bad (Spidey 3, XMen 3, derailing The Dark Knight in the 2nd Act, Avengers 1 and 2, etc...), so it seemed to me that Marvel was playing the long game and developing the necessary characters independently and over many years, then smashing them together after slowly introducing the arching story bit by bit within each of those franchises.

I thought, you know, that's a good fix for solving that problem and for the most part, I think it has worked as well as one can expect. But now it seems they are just doubling down by adding more and more and more new crap to each successive franchise with each go. Rather than develop this stuff, they just seem to want to create multiple Spidey 3's rather than a dozen Iron Man 1s.

And you start to realize that this is happening because of the strange nature of the contracts with their own content. The movie titles and roadmap are all there in advance, but each film seems totally up in the air and interchangeable midway through production if contracts happen to change--i.e.:
--Oh shit, we just got Spidey back!
--The film is complete sir! Principal photography just wrap--
--Fuck that! Let's cram some cartoons of spidey in there somewhere anyway. It will fucking own!
[thrashes head around while air-guitaring]
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,810
29,564
146
Avengers Part 1?

Avengers 1 was a bit of a mess, but none of that was new at the time. I think only Hawkeye was introduced there, right? (And it's not like anyone cares about Hawkeye.)

I think it was about as good as one can hope for a big, messy and mostly stupid superhero ensemble, but the difference here with the Civil War is that you also have a pretty large plot, involving multiple characters with long backstories that are only now being introduced into this world. It's basically another Avengers movie but now many of them are actually new. It does have that Spidey 3 feel to it.

I think the reason these backstories matter more, here, is because why should we care about some stranger like Black Panther showing up and suddenly taking sides? Who TF is that? Some King that also happens to make metal for Stark Industries....so the fuck what?
 

Skel

Diamond Member
Apr 11, 2001
6,218
661
136
Avengers Part 1?

Avengers 1 was a bit of a mess, but none of that was new at the time. I think only Hawkeye was introduced there, right? (And it's not like anyone cares about Hawkeye.)

I think it was about as good as one can hope for a big, messy and mostly stupid superhero ensemble, but the difference here with the Civil War is that you also have a pretty large plot, involving multiple characters with long backstories that are only now being introduced into this world. It's basically another Avengers movie but now many of them are actually new. It does have that Spidey 3 feel to it.

I think the reason these backstories matter more, here, is because why should we care about some stranger like Black Panther showing up and suddenly taking sides? Who TF is that? Some King that also happens to make metal for Stark Industries....so the fuck what?


Avengers wasn't where they introduced any new characters... at least none that got the spotlight (Thanos was teased at the end) Hawkeye was introduced in Thor. That formula of introducing characters in solo movies and then bringing them together worked really well. Avengers 2 was a mess. The problem is always the same. There's just not enough time to give the new guys the proper time and backstory while giving the established characters enough screen time to move them forward. Personally for me, it's just really depressing. Marvel really seemed to get the issue and found a way around it, only now they're just like everyone else. Their hubris seems to make it even worse with the amount of characters they're insisting on introducing in this movie. Hell, they're calling it a Captain America movie rather than the Marvel Universe/Avengers movie it is. I'm really curious to see how they're going to have time to really develop CA's character at all.. they should, it's his movie after all..
 

Aikouka

Lifer
Nov 27, 2001
30,383
912
126
Hm... I agree that Spider-Man looks kind of weird. I think the reason is that it almost looks like it was pulled straight from a comic book -- colors, textures, and all. It might just be poor CGI, but the movie comes out in two months.
 

ImpulsE69

Lifer
Jan 8, 2010
14,946
1,077
126
Don't characters come back to life in the comics all the time anyway? It's not like death ever means anything. Comics are so convoluted and ridiculous, it's not like a two hour movie could make things any worse.

Valid point.
 

Childs

Lifer
Jul 9, 2000
11,450
7
81
Avengers 1 was a bit of a mess, but none of that was new at the time. I think only Hawkeye was introduced there, right? (And it's not like anyone cares about Hawkeye.)

Hawkeye was introduced in the first Thor movie.

Anyways, this is going to be an insanely great year for comic book movies. And thats not even counting Deadpool since I havent seen it yet. I like the young Spider-Man and the mechanical web shooters, but one this puzzles me: If Underoos exist in this universe, what heroes did they represent? Cant be DC heroes. I wonder if they started making Underoos after the first Iron Man movie, although I think it would make more sense to have started after the first Avengers movie.
 

Denly

Golden Member
May 14, 2011
1,433
229
106
Am I the only that is sick of Marvel movies/TV? I almost fall asleep watching Avengers 2, no plan to watch anything that coming out this year.
 

KeithTalent

Elite Member | Administrator | No Lifer
Administrator
Nov 30, 2005
50,235
117
116
Am I the only that is sick of Marvel movies/TV? I almost fall asleep watching Avengers 2, no plan to watch anything that coming out this year.

Nope, I am with you. I have lost all interest, at least until Silver Surfer shows up in something again.

KT
 

NoTine42

Golden Member
Sep 30, 2013
1,387
78
91
Hawkeye was introduced in the first Thor movie.

Anyways, this is going to be an insanely great year for comic book movies. And thats not even counting Deadpool since I havent seen it yet. I like the young Spider-Man and the mechanical web shooters, but one this puzzles me: If Underoos exist in this universe, what heroes did they represent? Cant be DC heroes. I wonder if they started making Underoos after the first Iron Man movie, although I think it would make more sense to have started after the first Avengers movie.
 

ksheets

Senior member
Aug 11, 2000
743
71
91
At the end of the day, I'm just glad super-hero movies are finally being made.
Whether the movie is epic, or epic failure, I would rather have them in production versus most of the stupid crap that comes out....

Even though BvS looks like the potential for great suckage, I'm stoked to FINALLY see some of the DC heroes other than superman and bat-man on the big screen!

Just remember back in the late 80's- early 90's when it never seemed like it would be possible to have a world where comic book movies were actually taken seriously....
 

Skel

Diamond Member
Apr 11, 2001
6,218
661
136
At the end of the day, I'm just glad super-hero movies are finally being made.
Whether the movie is epic, or epic failure, I would rather have them in production versus most of the stupid crap that comes out....

Even though BvS looks like the potential for great suckage, I'm stoked to FINALLY see some of the DC heroes other than superman and bat-man on the big screen!

Just remember back in the late 80's- early 90's when it never seemed like it would be possible to have a world where comic book movies were actually taken seriously....

Back in the 80s I took a lot of crap over my love of comics. I was what would be called bullied these days. It's pretty amazing to see what was mocked back in my youth the standard for this generation. Though with some of the movies, I'm not sure we won...
 
Jun 18, 2000
11,140
722
126
So far Kevin Feige and Marvel has done a better job tying together all of these characters than I expected from Hollywood. The story arc has been in the making for 10 years. There have been, what, a dozen movies so far leading up to Civil War? Each one introduced new characters and provided some tie-in with the universe. Not all of them were great movies (most were mediocre, IMO), but I can appreciate what they are trying.
 

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,752
4,562
136
The part where he takes CA's shield, Iron Man should be like "Thanks, Spiderman." And then Spidey's like, "Everybody gets one."
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,929
142
106
These things can never be at the same scope of the comic books--just way way way too many characters, backstory, details, and bullshit that simply doesn't translate completely to the film medium.

You're essentially making the argument that several years-worth of multiple comic book storylines (some that go back decades) need to somehow be adequately represented in a 2 hour movie run time? or even 3 movies?

lolno.

It will by nature be very different, because they have already been building up the cinematic universe as something semi-representative but very dilute compared to the comic universe. You shouldn't take these as direct adaptations; as you shouldn't take any novel-to-film adaptation of any content.

It's also a very different audience. You aren't going to see Silver Surfer or Adam Warlock or the real Thanos represented to the LSD-infused complexity that they were in the old Jim Starlin days. Hell, they had to neuter and dumb down the Infinity Gauntlet into some toyish nonsense that will actually allow the Avengers to compete? Bullshit. If this multi-film and multi-year franchise were in any way faithful to that story, it would have begun and ended about 4 years ago: Thanos kills a bunch of people, steals their Infinity Gems...then snaps his fingers and half the universe perishes. ....that is the first comic in that series. The Avengers and various normal superheros (Even Thor, who is considered "a god") were sent up simply as a first wave cannon fodder, and that's exactly what happened.

It's already a joke and going to be a bigger joke in comparison. That, and just throwing in the hokey Celestial beings is just very weird for this type of audience. Are we going to see Celestial Titans recruiting entire systems of planets just to smash them one by one into Thanos in a futile attempt to stop him?

no.
Cosmic Marvel was always kinda dumb I thought. But they had to at least go there eventually. But maybe The Watcher will snap his fingers and make Cap and Bucky BFF's.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |