Originally posted by: DVK916
Originally posted by: bctbct
C probably contends that B was pushed into C after being hit by A. A loses.
Not possible since Car C was a few cars down from the original accident. They contend Car A scared Car B into fleeing into them.
Their logic is Car B never would have hit them if they didn't flee the scene of an accident, and Car B never would have had to flee the scene of an accident if Car A didn't hit Car B.
Which I think is just stupid logic.