Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Yeah, Europe's 3rd biggest bank is such a fool for having me learn about US MBS abd other securitization product underwriting. Who needs tens of millions of dollars in underwriting fees, or liability if the sector blows up...rags, conferences, and my own education is so worthless...
I can write a book about how this will effect market liquidity, spreads, risk adjustments, future discounting of securities, credit exodus. This isn't just reading securitization material, but actually seeing the results.
For example, the spreads on CMBS have gone up 300% in the last few months. Why? Because investors are worried about the risk. That 300% hits, eventually, the bottom line of issuers and originators. Eventually it'll get passed on to consumers. The *ONLY* reason why borrowing has been so cheap vs historical averages is because inflation has been low. Risk spreads are actually wider than many points in history and they are getting wider by the week. If inflation ticks up some more you'll see the Fed raise rates more, which has a multiplicative effect on interest rates.
Moody's announced that their decision to downgrade hundreds of sub-prime CMBS issuances a few months ago was actually too small. They now say they will double the amount of CMBS that will be downgraded and they are starting to look at prime CMBS also. All because they don't think there's enough credit protection. What that means is they are worried about the whole mortgage market, very worried.
The above also reduces the amount of funds people can lend, how much it costs, and who they can lend to. Sub-prime mortgages are a heck of lot less liquid now than they were 5 months ago. Those who are looking to refi out of a dangerous mortgage don't have the ability to do so. Anybody can see that, but most refuse to.
This isn't about demand drying up because there isn't anybody to buy. This is about rampant speculation through over-leveraging leading to an unprecidented asset bubble. If you look at the .bombs, they might have resulted in the loss of maybe 100bn in market cap, not sure on the exact dollar just tossing something out there. If you look at the housing market, a 3-4% decline that we have already seen is half that.
You still haven't even acknowledged that we are currently experiencing a decline. One the NAR/MBA never said would happen. The 3-4% we have seen so far is only the beginning. Even the NAR says we will see an overall decline this year, they say somewhere around 1.7%. Usually their figures work on a factor of 5. Thus, the real decline will be somewhere around 8.5%, if not more.
Additionally, on an inflation adjusted basis, an actual decrease in the price is only part of the equation. Since the house isn't keeping up with inflation you are actually also losing the inflationary value too. That 3-4% we have experienced already nationwide is actually more around 6-7% including inflation.
Although I preface my argument with one important item. If you are going to stay in that same house for more than 10 years, you'll be OK. Anything less than that and you're going to lose money.
I suggest you read up a bit on the Shiller index. Then, if you are able to, go check out IMN's site on ABS Spring, you can see the different tracks at a securitization conference. You'll see that the leading conference item is MBS.
I get a pretty good overview of the capital markets where I sit. My whole job is credit, since if I am about to extend a few hundred million to companies I need to know how their collateral performs, how the company operates, and where their primary market is heading. I don't think most people have taken a good look at this and the ones that have, like me, are very worried.
I hope I am wrong, because if I am right it'll mean that millions of families lose houses, savings, and perhaps retirement.
At this point, why not just wait a little bit to see where things are going? If his house goes up, it won't be by much. However, if it goes down he could save tens of thousands.