Cars run on water: Miracle or scam?

BespinReactorShaft

Diamond Member
Jun 9, 2004
3,190
0
0
Videos of this "miracle fuel" have been circulating on the web lately. What do you think? My automatic response is to call BS on this.

Several sources have claimed that it will never work due to something related to hydrogen valence. Can anyone explain this further?

Cars run on water: Miracle or scam?
Businessman claims hybrid technology more efficient with less emissions
Posted: May 20, 2006

Though the developer of a technology that uses water to produce a flammable gas says it provides a solution to high gas prices plaguing the nation, detractors claim the businessman's idea is a scam.

Denny Klein is president of Hydrogen Technologies Applications in Clearwater, Fla. His patented machine uses an electrical charge to separate the atoms of H2O into HHO, a gas he calls "Aquygen."

"You get a huge energy response," Klein told the Tampa Tribune. "But this gas is very, very safe."

He first used the fuel to power a welding tool, but soon tried it out in a hybrid automobile.

The flame, though on its own registers just 259 degrees Fahrenheit, heats up to the melting point of whatever substance it touches, explained Steve Lusko, project manager for Hydrogen Technologies Applications.

"For example, when you ignite our flame and touch it to steel, it will cut right through it at 1,400 degrees," Lusko told WND.

"It will melt a hole right through a brick at 4,500 degrees. ? It reacts to whatever it touches."

So, Lusko says, the gas has the ability to bond to whatever fuel it is mixed with, like gasoline in a hybrid car.

"Upon combustion, you get a dramatic increase in energy BTUs," he said, "and you get an equally dramatic decrease in emission pollution, because the burn is so highly efficient, what would have come out of the tailpipe as an emission ends up getting burned up and used."

An "electrolyzer" in Klein's 1994 Ford Escort uses electricity from the alternator to initiate the electrolysis process to make the HHO gas out of water, explained Lusko. That gas is then pumped to the manifold and into the gas tank.

"The gas then bonds with the gasoline in the gas tank," Lusko said, "and then upon combustion, that's when you get the reaction, giving you higher gas mileage and cleaner emissions."

Why not run a car with exclusively HHO gas?

"We have combustion engines here that have run completely on our Aquygen," Lusko said, "but it would be a matter of engineering."

Lusko says in tests the mileage of the hybrid vehicle has improved anywhere from 25 to 53 percent.

Hydrogen Technologies Applications has a patent on its generator and has one pending on Aquygen.

Lusko says the company has already talked to some auto companies about using the technology in new vehicles.

Not everyone in the tech world is cheering for Klein and his process.

Writing on peswiki.com, Ken Rasmussen stated: "[Klein] may have an efficient way to break down water for pure hydrogen and oxygen to run an engine. Several of us are on the verge of perfecting the process, but none of us want to make fools of ourselves with TV claims until ALL the bugs are exterminated."

Rasmussen was referring to a TV news story that ran about Klein on Fox affiliate KRIV-TV in Houston, Texas.

"Gases are dangerous and hard to store and hard to compress ? they do not do an efficient job of temporarily storing energy," wrote Eric Kreig on the same site. "The gas produced by separating water is dangerous and has been called many things. ? It has been available for years from many sources. These machines are heavy and suck in a lot more power than you ever get out of them by burning the gas back into water."

Wrote a message board participant at peakoil.com: "Overall, [the technology is] rather pointless, as it wastes lots of energy. Just a simple charge-and-go electric car sounds like a much better idea."

Yet another opined: "Some scamsters have claimed that their miracle electrolyzer produces a magical mixture of hydrogen and oxygen, that is somehow different from other mixtures of hydrogen and oxygen in that it is not explosive and contains three to 10 times as much energy as hydrogen. Historically, scammers have given their magical mixtures all sorts of names. HHO or Klein gas appears to be nothing more than the latest name given to this nonsense."

Lusko was adamant the technology is real and the company has nothing to hide.

"We are what we are," he said. "The technology is what it appears to be. Do you think we would expose ourselves on Fox News if it were a scam?"

Added Lusko: "The only fools that would [call the technology a scam] are people who haven't seen it. It's not possible to make that statement if they have any idea what they're talking about. ? I witness the technology every single day of my life."

Lusko says he became an investor in the company a year and a half ago and told Klein at that time he "must be a part of this." That's when Lusko began working for the firm.

"This technology is going to end up being in the mainstream eventually," he predicted, "and then the critics are going to look absolutely foolish."

Klein says he plans to take Hydrogen Technology, which now has private investors, public this year.

 

Eeezee

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2005
9,923
0
0
My basic understanding of how it works:

Hydrogen is a burnable fuel, but liberating the hydrogen from water takes more energy than you'd get from just burning it.

I don't know WTF this guy is talking about though. How would a chemical like HHO even exist? Like you said, the valence electron configuration makes no sense to my basic chemistry knowledge.
 

Eeezee

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2005
9,923
0
0
"We are what we are," he said. "The technology is what it appears to be. Do you think we would expose ourselves on Fox News if it were a scam?"

It should be noted now that "exposing" yourself on Fox News does not lend to your credibility at all. This is the same network that ran a special report on the Moon Landing hoax :roll:
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
Originally posted by: Eeezee
It should be noted now that "exposing" yourself on Fox News does not lend to your credibility at all. This is the same network that ran a special report on the Moon Landing hoax :roll:
The Discovery Channel recently aired a documentary on the moon landing hoax that was pretty good. Point being that it's sometimes worthwhile to spend a little time to prove others wrong just so we can move on, if nothing else.

As for the idea of HHO, this has been discussed in other threads in this forum. I'm too tired tonight to do any digging... Maybe tomorrow.
 

BrownTown

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2005
5,314
1
0
Is this thread supposed to be a joke? Seems like one of those threads where you get alot of people to be like "oh wow a new technology that roxors", just to tell them that all you did was make some cr@p up to prove how gullible people are? That would probably work better in P&N than here.
 

Eeezee

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2005
9,923
0
0
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: Eeezee
It should be noted now that "exposing" yourself on Fox News does not lend to your credibility at all. This is the same network that ran a special report on the Moon Landing hoax :roll:
The Discovery Channel recently aired a documentary on the moon landing hoax that was pretty good. Point being that it's sometimes worthwhile to spend a little time to prove others wrong just so we can move on, if nothing else.

As for the idea of HHO, this has been discussed in other threads in this forum. I'm too tired tonight to do any digging... Maybe tomorrow.

At least the Discovery Channel offered some stories that supported the moon landing... the Fox News report was pretending like the event really didn't happen!
 

BrownTown

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2005
5,314
1
0
Maybe we can jsut leave the moon landing discussion to the moon landing thread? People just put that cr@p on TV because its what watchers want to see, i'm sure neither the executives at Fox or Discovery channel actualy believe that the moon landing was fake. I see stuff about alien abductions and a million other conspiracy theories on these stations too, but again they are just there becasue they are interesting stories not becasue they are being presented as fact.
 

theMan

Diamond Member
Mar 17, 2005
4,386
0
0
why does making gasoline burn really hot, make the car more efficient? does he even understand how a car works? maybe for a furnace... but even so, that article sounds like it is writen by a 6th grader. "...but soon tried it out in a hybrid automobile." and, how can you SEPARATE the atoms of H2O and still have HHO? hmmmmm...... this is just total BS, and anyone who cant tell after reading the first 3 sentences is just retarded. it makes me feel like an idiot just replying to this. ahhh, i feel sick.
 

dkozloski

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
3,005
0
76
This is the fuel that powers the supersonic submarine that travels between Paris and Montreal!
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,606
166
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
Originally posted by: theman
why does making gasoline burn really hot, make the car more efficient? does he even understand how a car works? maybe for a furnace... but even so, that article sounds like it is writen by a 6th grader. "...but soon tried it out in a hybrid automobile." and, how can you SEPARATE the atoms of H2O and still have HHO? hmmmmm...... this is just total BS, and anyone who cant tell after reading the first 3 sentences is just retarded. it makes me feel like an idiot just replying to this. ahhh, i feel sick.

It's been 20 years since I've bothered reading about it or have done any work with it, but in the Carnot energy cycle, you do get more efficiency with a higher temperature. This is the reason they (ceramic engineers) were trying to come up with a ceramic engine - it didn't have to be cooled as much as a metal based engine.
 

sao123

Lifer
May 27, 2002
12,648
201
106
Originally posted by: russoxley187
sounds like a scam to me


http://www.waterfuelconverters.com/port...ndex.php?option=com_frontpage&Itemid=1

I think you guys need to read up on this... they're not making absurd claims like others...


Note: It is not economically viable to use these generators to produce a primary fuel, it would be increasingly conservative to use electricity directly; although using these generators to enhance carbon based fuel results in a net economic savings and a substantial logistical improvement. Torch applications are also economically viable in most instances.

sounds like fuel dilution to me.
Your gonna lose power, but save fuel. no rules broken here.
 

BrownTown

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2005
5,314
1
0
So the point is to be a fuel additive that leads to more complete combustion? Anyways, I'll believe it when I see it.
 

dkozloski

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
3,005
0
76
Some automobile fuels that have been scientifically proven to work include wood, peat moss, coal, garbage, pig poop, french fry oil, crankcase drainings, moonshine whiskey, and chicken manure.
 

theMan

Diamond Member
Mar 17, 2005
4,386
0
0
i read about some thing that they sold back in the 70s, it was like, a thing that you attached to your carburetor that sprayed water in with your gas. just saves gas, but yeah, its like having super weak gasoline.
 

Born2bwire

Diamond Member
Oct 28, 2005
9,840
6
71
I think this was posted on ATOT. I think some people were saying that it was just Brown's Gas renamed.
 

MrUniq

Senior member
Mar 26, 2006
307
0
0
Where is a Mr Fusion when you need one... given the future of fuel cells it seems possible...but doubt it. IMO we should've been off gas years ago.
 

BrownTown

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2005
5,314
1
0
Fuel cells are just a more efficient engine for burning fossil fuels, you still need natural gas, or gasoline as the fuel. Unless you use hydrogen fuel cells which are just a crappy form of battery.
 

herm0016

Diamond Member
Feb 26, 2005
8,420
1,047
126
you guys need some more brain... all he is doing is electrolysis of water, he gets the perfect combustion ratio of hydogen to oxygen. very volitial mixture, not safe at all. we use to build balloon bombs this way, collect the H and the O in a ballon and then touch a match to it.. we have litterly blown the doors off of things. but it takes more energy to seperate the o and the h than it makes when it combusts. he does not get HHO he gets H2+O2 (both H and O are binary) then adds a catylist (like a flame) to get H2O like this as a balanced chem. equation: 2H2 + O2 =2H2O in theroy you could add this to any combustion cycle and get more energy out of it. his method is perfectly fine, how he is doing it, storing it and such seems a little shaky.

 

Born2bwire

Diamond Member
Oct 28, 2005
9,840
6
71
Originally posted by: herm0016
you guys need some more brain... all he is doing is electrolysis of water, he gets the perfect combustion ratio of hydogen to oxygen. very volitial mixture, not safe at all. we use to build balloon bombs this way, collect the H and the O in a ballon and then touch a match to it.. we have litterly blown the doors off of things. but it takes more energy to seperate the o and the h than it makes when it combusts. he does not get HHO he gets H2+O2 (both H and O are binary) then adds a catylist (like a flame) to get H2O like this as a balanced chem. equation: 2H2 + O2 =2H2O in theroy you could add this to any combustion cycle and get more energy out of it. his method is perfectly fine, how he is doing it, storing it and such seems a little shaky.

That's not exactly what he's claiming. They claim that they do not get separate H2 and O2 gas molecules but some molecule of HHO. This is just a new marketing scheme for Brown's Gas which people have been trying to sell for years now.

Wiki
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |