And you are helping bring it about. Destabilising democracy, as you and your ilk are doing, leads either to fascism or the Gulags. The only question is which way will it go.
Hand me those rose colored glasses please.
Just stand by and watch as half of the country gets it's freedom of speech taken away and also has their freedom to vote taken away as well.
Just wait until the communist party takes away your voice as well. It's coming my friend.
You want proof these idiots have completely lost their fucking mind? Well there it is...LOL what the fuck are you talking about?
Just like elections, huffing paint has consequences.These peoples' minds are literally mush.
You want proof these idiots have completely lost their fucking mind? Well there it is...
Speak English! None of that fancy pants liberal élite speech.Quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat
It's something something Prius owners are demented.Speak English! None of that fancy pants liberal élite speech.
Speak English! None of that fancy pants liberal élite speech.
you are way to over the fucking deep end......Did you watch the video? They sent everyone home and then waited to make sure they were gone. Once they were gone they pulled ballots out of suitcases that were hidden under a table. Doesn't sound fishy to you? Even if they were real ballots there were no witnesses to verify the ballots from either party. That by itself constitutes fraud.
You realize the Chinese are behind your team right? That they are limiting free speech and the media is now a propaganda machine for the left? You can't see anything wrong here?
You also realize once we go down this road of allowing fraudulent elections there is no going back? The corruption must be cut out like cancer or it will consume us all.
Shocking
American Greatness - Bias and Credibility
RIGHT BIAS These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They maymediabiasfactcheck.com
Ironically enough he is unwilling to actually provide proof of said cancer he is so concerned about.Once you go down this road of attempting to overturn legitimate elections where there is absolutely no evidence of fraud there is no going back. The corruption has already consumed you and all who share your self-serving delusions.
Palmer Report exclusive: "Media Bias Fact Check" is a malicious scam site
"Media Bias Fact Check" is just one guy making up ratings and changing them at randomwww.palmerreport.com
"
Amid the growing concern about the veracity of online news outlets, various internet users have begun to scrutinize what they read. And that’s a good thing. But that fear has also created an opportunity for scam artists to maliciously sow confusion for their own personal agenda or amusement. Perhaps the most jarring instance of these scams is a site called “Media Bias Fact Check” which turns out to be just one guy making up whatever he feels like about news outlets, based on what he admits is his personal opinion, while typically providing no evidence – and then altering the ratings of news outlets who point out his scam.
One look at the “Media Bias Fact Check” website reveals it to be something that looks like it was created in 1995. Despite claiming in its tag line to be “The most comprehensive media bias resource,” the site turns out to simply be one guy named Dave Van Zandt who posts whatever he feels like. He claims to use a “strict methodology” for assigning bias ratings to various news outlets, but his “ratings” typically read like the gibberish one might find in an unmoderated comment section in the lowest corners of the internet.
For instance, his rating for Cosmopolitan Magazine consists of “Cosmopolitan is an international fashion magazine for women and has a circulation of over 3 million. (Wikipedia) Cosmo’s primary focus is on fashion, sex and relationship tips, but they also cover politics. Cosmo has a strong left wing bias in reporting and story selection. Though biased, Cosmo usual published sourced information.” That last sentence is so grammatically mangled, we’re not even sure what it means. Even more absurdly, he’s quoting Wikipedia as his sole source of information."
My media bias fact check is better than your media bias fact check, neener neener neener.
Both along with snopes, WP etc. have the same amount of credibility to me....... none.
At least OP didn't toss in words in all caps
Who are you to order me or any other citizen what to do? Nothing, nobody, just another irate person on the web spewing insults and profanity.Shut the fuck up, clown.
Oh noez, 250?!? Stop the fucking presses! Shut the fuck up, clown.
You didn't even read the article, you fucking clown. Shut the fuck up.
There IS no other qualifier, dummy.
Uh huh. And the 'msm' is whomever says something you don't agree with because it's not batshit crazy enough or full of enough lies. Shut the fuck up, clown. You can't even read the sources you DO use, or at least be honest about their contents.
Yeah, okay McCarthy. You're a fucking clown.
Not a fucking chance. He's too stupid to realize it, or too dishonest to admit it. Either way, it's obvious his brain is too broken to admit anything once he's made a false claim.
We seem to have a problem with semantics. I've made no claim that the irregularities or various election frauds that happened around the country is/was enough to have changed the outcome of the election. The fact that these irregularities and possible election frauds (judging from sworn statements of individuals) in various States across the country makes it widespread, but not decisive.I guess you don't read your own source material. Here's a quote from that Fox article you cited in which Sec of State Raffensperger SAYS it's all a conspiracy theory:
"Raffensperger also hit back at allegations of widespread fraud, saying those that perpetuate them 'are exploiting the emotions of many Trump supporters with fantastic claims, half-truths, misinformation and, frankly, they're misleading the president as well, apparently."'
Who are you to order me or any other citizen what to do? Nothing, nobody, just another irate person on the web spewing insults and profanity.
Lol widespread geographically means nothing. Land does not vote, people do.We seem to have a problem with semantics. I've made no claim that the irregularities or various election frauds that happened around the country is/was enough to have changed the outcome of the election. The fact that these irregularities and possible election frauds (judging from sworn statements of individuals) in various States across the country makes it widespread, but not decisive.
Palmer Report exclusive: "Media Bias Fact Check" is a malicious scam site
"Media Bias Fact Check" is just one guy making up ratings and changing them at randomwww.palmerreport.com
"
Amid the growing concern about the veracity of online news outlets, various internet users have begun to scrutinize what they read. And that’s a good thing. But that fear has also created an opportunity for scam artists to maliciously sow confusion for their own personal agenda or amusement. Perhaps the most jarring instance of these scams is a site called “Media Bias Fact Check” which turns out to be just one guy making up whatever he feels like about news outlets, based on what he admits is his personal opinion, while typically providing no evidence – and then altering the ratings of news outlets who point out his scam.
One look at the “Media Bias Fact Check” website reveals it to be something that looks like it was created in 1995. Despite claiming in its tag line to be “The most comprehensive media bias resource,” the site turns out to simply be one guy named Dave Van Zandt who posts whatever he feels like. He claims to use a “strict methodology” for assigning bias ratings to various news outlets, but his “ratings” typically read like the gibberish one might find in an unmoderated comment section in the lowest corners of the internet.
For instance, his rating for Cosmopolitan Magazine consists of “Cosmopolitan is an international fashion magazine for women and has a circulation of over 3 million. (Wikipedia) Cosmo’s primary focus is on fashion, sex and relationship tips, but they also cover politics. Cosmo has a strong left wing bias in reporting and story selection. Though biased, Cosmo usual published sourced information.” That last sentence is so grammatically mangled, we’re not even sure what it means. Even more absurdly, he’s quoting Wikipedia as his sole source of information."
My media bias fact check is better than your media bias fact check, neener neener neener.
Both along with snopes, WP etc. have the same amount of credibility to me....... none.
I think he meant white bread.Lol widespread geographically means nothing. Land does not vote, people do.
If you have 1000 fraudulent votes in a total poll of 100M (to make the math easy), congrats, you have a fraudulent vote rate of 1 in 100,000 or 0.001%, which is pretty damn negligible and a far cry from "widespread".
I fear you are going to have to make the very difficult to understand "science of mathematics" much simpler for a trumphumper. I don't know how you do that, as I can't comprehend that level of ignorance, but maybe a NASCAR or Bud Lite beer analogy.Lol widespread geographically means nothing. Land does not vote, people do.
If you have 1000 fraudulent votes in a total poll of 100M (to make the math easy), congrats, you have a fraudulent vote rate of 1 in 100,000 or 0.001%, which is pretty damn negligible and a far cry from "widespread".
They had to write that check because of the Pelosi/Schumer/Squad/Hillary Clinton tax increase that President Hillary put in place.I fear you are going to have to make the very difficult to understand "science of mathematics" much simpler for a trumphumper. I don't know how you do that, as I can't comprehend that level of ignorance, but maybe a NASCAR or Bud Lite beer analogy.
Remember these are the same people that believe they received a tax cut from trump, then had to write a check to the US Treasury Dept and include it with their 1040EZ, because only their withholding had been changed.
You have no credibility here either, clown. The only time you "fact-check" is if and when you find something that agrees with you, not because they are factual.My media bias fact check is better than your media bias fact check, neener neener neener.
Both along with snopes, WP etc. have the same amount of credibility to me....... none.
Still screaming at that mirror. Who is crying about a fantasy "stolen election" based on nothing? I tell clowns like you to shut the fuck up because they're dishonest asshats that the rest of the country is tired of tolerating. Nobody cares about your toddler foot-stomping tantrum.Who are you to order me or any other citizen what to do? Nothing, nobody, just another irate person on the web spewing insults and profanity.
No, it was because when Trump cut the taxes for the rich, he also reduced the withholding rates from payroll deductions. End result these idiots thought the got a tax cut, but their tax liability didn't change, only the amount that was withheld on payday.They had to write that check because of the Pelosi/Schumer/Squad/Hillary Clinton tax increase that President Hillary put in place.