Wife has an acquaintance who noted on Facebook that she refused to get health insurance because Obamacare is socialism which is evil and wrong.
When her son broke a bone, she drove two hours to a Native American hospital for free care because she has enough heritage to qualify.
I have a relative in Maryland who did much the same thing. She and her husband refused to sign up for the Evil Obamacare despite the fact that they would have easily qualified for subsidized coverage or potentially Medicaid. (I don't know how much they make but I know it's not much) Her husband had a heart attack a little less than two years back and now they are screwed financially. It's sad to see people driven to personal ruin over this sort of stupidity but they adamantly refused to see reason. It didn't hurt Obama's feelings that they didn't sign up, it didn't change the law, it just screwed them personally.
Regardless, DSF is being extremely dishonest with his framing of the mandate screwing over the poor. The poorest Americans are covered by Medicaid (or would be if Republicans would let them be), and so anyone's failure to sign up for free health care is their own fault. Of those who aren't covered by Medicaid most other poor Americans receive heavily subsidized insurance. The people you're really talking about who are screwed by the mandate are those who make too much to qualify for subsidies but too little to really afford insurance. This certainly does suck for them and is something we need to address in new legislation. The thing is, once you remove the mandate you send premiums through the roof, so while you might provide some tax relief to people who can't afford insurance right now but have to pay the mandate you also HUGELY expand the numbers of people who can't afford insurance anymore.
This is why objective analysis of removing the mandate shows around 13 million additional people losing insurance. I guess they didn't get DSF's memo about how good repealing the mandate will be for them though, haha.