Have posted before about how the nation views news and their source of news. CNN continues to drop in the number of people who use them as a source of news. One would think they would change the "course" knowing their numbers continue to fall.
People see through their biased attempt and the declining numbers are indicative of that...
ratings...
Which sponsors have they lost?As long as Zucker is the president, they will not change course and continue to push Orange Man Bad until they lose all of their sponsors. It would have to change ownership but they'll ride this out to bankruptcy since Zucker is obsessed with Trump.
How about actually reporting the news with real reporters and journalists and not political activists posing as the aforementioned? Too much to ask and they can't help themselves. People are flocking to actual content now but they'll ride this into the grave out of hubris and hatred.By 'changing their course' you mean you want to force them to adopt an editorial policy that conforms to your own bias, of course.
What always amazes about these trolls is their ability to tell obvious baldfaced self-serving lies as though they were factual, and their expectation that we must believe their lies because they say so. And also that they don't realize that that ability of theirs, all by itself, is both proof of their authoritarianism and thus the single biggest reason to oppose them. Because, other than actual violence, very little is more authoritarian than the forced imposition of falsehood on others.lol at garbage thread.
How about actually reporting the news with real reporters and journalists and not political activists posing as the aforementioned? Too much to ask and they can't help themselves. People are flocking to actual content now but they'll ride this into the grave out of hubris and hatred.
It's implied that they're losing advertisers because they're fake news. Aside from the type of content, their plummeting numbers on viewership are going to be a formidable one-two punch that may eventually K-O them.Which sponsors have they lost?
Meredith Artley,
SVP & Editor In Chief for CNN Digital Worldwide, said that too many advertisers are painting news content with the same brush as web content that has been deemed unsafe, whether that's ads next to hate videos on YouTube or alongside fake news articles on Facebook.
The executive called for a new definition of brand safe content, one that includes CNN's hard news stock in trade, during a keynote at the Collision Conference in New Orleans on Wednesday.
"In these turbulent times, advertisers might not want to be associated with news that is just bad," she said. "You can kinda understand that."
"But it's problematic for CNN and for many other news organizations," she said.
They're liberal until their corporate masters start taking hits.It always amuses me when righties try to cast CNN as some sort of liberal bastion rather than the canonical example of corporatocratic media.
Just part of the hate that their political propaganda disguised as news pushes on them every day.It always amuses me when righties try to cast CNN as some sort of liberal bastion rather than the canonical example of corporatocratic media.
'Implied.'It's implied that they're losing advertisers because they're fake news.
CNN says it's being unfairly punished by advertisers
CNN says that too many advertisers are shying away from supporting news, even as people consume more news content than ever. The company's digital editor-in-chief urged advertisers to rethink their definitions of what is brand safe, saying that too many are lumping in hard news with...www.businessinsider.com
https://www.cnn.com/profiles/meredith-artley-profile
So CNN didn't do a "woe is me b/c advertisers don't like us as much" tour? Yes it's implied they are in a downspiral but mainly because they aren't reporting the news in an unbiased fashion. They and MSM propelled Trump into office.'Implied.'
You'll excuse me if my burden of proof is higher than your gullibility.
BTW, "fake news" is a codephrase for your hatred of freedom of the press.
Well, it's clear that there's no cognitive challenges here when these 'conservatives' keep ranting about much 'The Left' supposedly hates the 1a, when they're the ones always trying to silence speech and media they disagree with, such as the example provided by this thread.Lol at the morons who cite Breitbart complaining about biased news.
Conservatives should remember a simple fact: no one, and I mean no one, thinks conservatives are stupider than conservative media does. They all think you are morons and they are laughing at you as they lie to your face, every day.
You mean like Fox news does? Lol...How about actually reporting the news with real reporters and journalists and not political activists posing as the aforementioned? Too much to ask and they can't help themselves. People are flocking to actual content now but they'll ride this into the grave out of hubris and hatred.
So CNN didn't do a "woe is me b/c advertisers don't like us as much" tour? Yes it's implied they are in a downspiral but mainly because they aren't reporting the news in an unbiased fashion. They and MSM propelled Trump into office.
Fake news is my dislike of biased outlets who parade activists as journalists.
So CNN didn't do a "woe is me b/c advertisers don't like us as much" tour? Yes it's implied they are in a downspiral but mainly because they aren't reporting the news in an unbiased fashion. They and MSM propelled Trump into office.
Fake news is my dislike of biased outlets who parade activists as journalists.