- Oct 9, 1999
- 39,230
- 701
- 126
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ceo-workers-youll-likely-fired-131640914.html
Does this sound like voter intimidation to anyone else?
The man says it's not...
but the tone of the article sure suggests so.
What do you guys think (I think I already know what the answer will be and whether it's OK or NOT - depending on the side of the aisle).
I personally think that this is crossing the line and is pure intimidation. And as for the comments about making it on your own paycheck instead of relying on the government, maybe if you (Mr. CEO) paid your employees a little better, they wouldn't need as much government, eh?
Does this sound like voter intimidation to anyone else?
The man says it's not...
Siegel stressed that he wasn't out to intimidate his workers into voting for Romney. "I can't tell anyone to vote," he said. But he wants to make sure his workers made an informed choice. "I want my employees to be educated on what could happen to their future if the wrong person is elected."
but the tone of the article sure suggests so.
What do you guys think (I think I already know what the answer will be and whether it's OK or NOT - depending on the side of the aisle).
I personally think that this is crossing the line and is pure intimidation. And as for the comments about making it on your own paycheck instead of relying on the government, maybe if you (Mr. CEO) paid your employees a little better, they wouldn't need as much government, eh?
Last edited: