China poised to blow by US in science, engineering and more....

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Orignal Earl

Diamond Member
Oct 27, 2005
8,059
55
86
He'd be wasting his time.

Well no..he would not be wasting his time. He would be using his time to fix something he sees as a failure, the best way he could.

How does that saying go? " If you just focus on the mountain ahead of you the task could seem impossible, so focus on carving out the first step. Make it the best step you can, then repeat "
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,656
687
126
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/3-charts-show-chinas-scientific-192255174.html




Manufacturing pulled out from under the middle class and the tech/science jobs are next. The smug people around here who are so very happy to see the manufacturing in other countries (so they can buy their cheap stuff) may very well be feeding the country that's going to turn around and eat them.

That giant sucking sound might be gaining more force....more than any of you imagined. Did you honestly think that China was going to stop at the 'lowly menial manufacturing job'?


Yeah, and shockingly enough, I bet exec jobs don't get outsourced.....
 

momeNt

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2011
9,297
352
126
I'm okay with all this.

I think the USA has enough land to fall back on that in the end, we could just become an agrarian society.

The only thing to worry about then is being conquered. So we would need some sort of militia and an economy large enough to still be able to manufacture guns and bullets.

Who knows, it might be nice?
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,563
9
81
The stupidity of comparing the Chinese and American economies like you just tried here is only superseded by the stupidity of trying to paint Obama as some kind of rabid communist/socialist.

Is the above post really what you consider a serious, well thought out proposition?

Those tired songs are just that, tired. You don't like the guy and his policies, fine. But please, base your complaints in reality.

Fucking American partisanship. Your country is, in many ways, tearing itself apart and all half the population can do is call each other stupid names while the other half doesn't seem to give a damn about anything at all.

I can't stand the guy myself as I've explained to you in the past. I think his continuation and expansion of the surveillance society tactics of his predecessor is verging on criminal as is his use of extrajudicial killing of both American citizens and non citizens.

Throw in the fact that he's not much more than a Wall Street sock puppet who's main concern seems to be his historical legacy as the "1st Black President" and I'd say there's plenty of *real* issues to bitch about without making up weird shit about what a commie the guy is.


Stop eating the lead paint chips, idiot. What kind of nonsensical rambling is this steaming pile of shit you've laid out here?

Nothing you said had ANYTHING to do with what I posted.
 

justoh

Diamond Member
Jun 11, 2013
3,686
81
91
Opinions vary. If you think that statement is the most lame or most superficial, you've not been on these forums more than 5 minutes.

Actually I have been around for more than 5 minutes. You would know that if you took the time to glimpse at my information. Honestly.... Some people....
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,234
701
126
Actually I have been around for more than 5 minutes. You would know that if you took the time to glimpse at my information. Honestly.... Some people....

I was trying to give you the benefit of the doubt, but I guess I was wrong.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
33,578
7,639
136
America is gridlocked and we're not taking any necessary action to stop capitalism from pumping our wealth overseas. The guy's comments on partisanship are quite poignant to the topic at hand.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,563
9
81
America is gridlocked and we're not taking any necessary action to stop capitalism from pumping our wealth overseas. The guy's comments on partisanship are quite poignant to the topic at hand.

I said nothing partisan in my post. I was merely using the metrics he himself chose to point out that our economy isn't all that different than China. He then went on a (presumably) drunken rant about black presidents and communists.
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,234
701
126
I said nothing partisan in my post. I was merely using the metrics he himself chose to point out that our economy isn't all that different than China. He then went on a (presumably) drunken rant about black presidents and communists.

I'm not who Jakalas was responding to, lol. It could have been 1/2 dozen people! :biggrin:
 

realibrad

Lifer
Oct 18, 2013
12,337
898
126
Capitalism does not care about borders. If resources are flowing to China, its likely because that is the most efficient use of said resources.

If the US wants to lead the world, then it must do the work to do so. As for China taking over honestly its not going to happen soon.

China has 4x the population of the US, yet its GDP is a only 52% that of the US.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,415
14,307
136
I feel I have to point this out.

That is no different from the USA, or almost any 1st world country. All of these systems are modern day implementations of economic hierarchies that existed under feudalism.

You pay a tax to "own" property. If you fail to pay your tax, you will be removed from "your" property. You do not have the right to do what you wish on "your' property (even if you live in the boonies). For example, few "landowners" have mineral rights to their land.

And if the gov't decides they need to do something for the "greater good" using your property, you will find that your land is not yours no matter where you live.

See eminent domain.

The only thing that will save you is the same thing that would save you in China - public outrage. Most of the time that doesn't happen.
Except that in America you can sue the government and have a reasonable chance of winning if your grievance is legitimate. Try that in China.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
I feel I have to point this out.

That is no different from the USA, or almost any 1st world country. All of these systems are modern day implementations of economic hierarchies that existed under feudalism.

You pay a tax to "own" property. If you fail to pay your tax, you will be removed from "your" property. You do not have the right to do what you wish on "your' property (even if you live in the boonies). For example, few "landowners" have mineral rights to their land.

And if the gov't decides they need to do something for the "greater good" using your property, you will find that your land is not yours no matter where you live.

See eminent domain.

The only thing that will save you is the same thing that would save you in China - public outrage. Most of the time that doesn't happen.
This is true. Kelo v. New London should have been sufficient to pull the wool away from everyone's eyes.

Last I checked roughly 40 of the economy is still outright owned or controlled by the Chinese govt./communist party and a good chunk of what remains was hived off to 'private' individuals and families who are friends and relatives of the party leaders. The Chinese govt. still puts out '5 year plans' for the economy. Apparently the country is in it's 12th 5 year plan.

While elements of capitalism have been mixed in, the overall economy is certainly not capitalist.
And that would be different from America how, exactly? Government at all levels has to be around that same proportion of GDP, and our collective governments are not nearly as efficient as is China's as we tend to be in-fighting and repeatedly changing direction. Meanwhile China's private sector is much less burdened with regulations than is America's private sector. Yes, China has some centralized planning; we do the same thing with regulations and laws. Much easier to guide people with centralized planning than with repeated electric shocks when they leave the secret path, but the latter doesn't give more freedom, just the illusion of more freedom.

Yeah, and shockingly enough, I bet exec jobs don't get outsourced.....
Eventually they do. At first it's only manufacturing that gets outsourced. Soon it's design engineering, because without hands-on feedback it's difficult to keep current on best design practices. The manufacturer points out all the problems and offers to do the design engineering per the parent corporation's marketing specifications at no extra cost. Then it's quality control as the execs figure out that as designs change, quality control in America is no longer capable of catching problems on designs they no longer really understand. Up to this point, the American corporation is living high on the hog and getting very top-heavy with executive and marketing functions and payroll. But eventually, the manufacturer has enough design experience and contacts to offer its own products to the American corporation's customers, usually with the best innovations and features they've held for themselves and always at lower cost.

At that point the American corporation is going to collapse. If they are lucky enough to be huge, like IBM or General Electric, they have a lot of divisions to sell off and can keep themselves in business for a long time. (And probably have a healthy IP base as well.) If they are smaller, like Oster Corporation, they either fold, get bought up very cheaply, or re-invent themselves as a retailer or niche manufacturer. Either way, once the outsource manufacturer matures enough to be its parent's competitor, exec levels jobs begin sloughing off.

Of course, that's cold comfort to the Americans who lost their own jobs a generation earlier.
 

alcoholbob

Diamond Member
May 24, 2005
6,271
323
126
I'd argue that it's mainly a free enterprise, market economy. A pretty screwed up one in many respects but still. Certainly it's far less a 'mixed economy' than most countries in the world.

How can the United States be "mainly" a free enterprise economy when there are more employed in government than private employees?
 

cyclohexane

Platinum Member
Feb 12, 2005
2,837
19
81
I'm okay with all this.

I think the USA has enough land to fall back on that in the end, we could just become an agrarian society.

The only thing to worry about then is being conquered. So we would need some sort of militia and an economy large enough to still be able to manufacture guns and bullets.

Who knows, it might be nice?

Wtf? It might be nice? Nope. I'm sitting at the DMV and the number of retards is astounding.
We cannot be okay with more dumbasses flooding the gene pool.
 

irishScott

Lifer
Oct 10, 2006
21,568
3
0
Fucking American partisanship. Your country is, in many ways, tearing itself apart and all half the population can do is call each other stupid names while the other half doesn't seem to give a damn about anything at all.

And you think this is a new phenomenon? America rarely makes big changes without bursting at the seams first. Fact is the vast majority of the voting public is still well off enough to not really care about voting.
 

Mr. Pedantic

Diamond Member
Feb 14, 2010
5,039
0
76
All the brains in the world mean nothing if your people lack the will to innovate. Just as how the Iraqi lack the will to fight for freedom. Let us know when the other worlds countries starts picking up on those qualities.

Why would they want freedom? All it's brought them is civil war, car bombs, and getting "random" patdowns at airports.
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,329
126
We haven't liked science in the US for quite some time. Not that long ago we lead the world in particle physics (look at the names close to the end of the periodic table of elements) and we even had plans to keep it that way. After spending 2 billion dollars we canceled the Superconducting Super Collider which would have been 5 times more powerful than the LHC. Back in the mid 50's we knew basically dickall about space or how to get there. It took us a little over a decade to design, build, test and fly manned missions to, and eventually land on, the friggen moon. Today we have to hitch a ride into low earth orbit "boldly bumming a ride to where hundreds (thousands?) have gone before". What's the latest prediction on when NASAs next manned space vehicle, just to get to LEO, will be ready?
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |