Thats because you disagree with the Christians though, they wanted to voice there opinions and they did, so your saying that no criticism should be allowed, typical liberal
Why is it wrong to disagree with christians who show up simply to incite Muslims to rage?
If the christians were there on a mission of peace, rather than to insult and enrage a large group of Muslim and Arabic people, many of whom were either christian or Islamic, then none of us would care--and frankly, you would not be so pseudo-enraged about this.
Instead, the christians simply exercised their right to be colossal dickbags for absolutely no reason---
nothing they did promotes welfare or the advancement of society and culture (the only reason that unpopular speech is protected).
Further--do you think it will ever be generally acceptable for christians to be colossal dickbags whenever they feel the need to insult Islam? I do not, and I believe 99% of the people here agree with that.
Honestly, OP--I do not believe that you actually adhere to the notion that "the right to do something equals the necessity to do it." I think you are simply touting these fundamentally flawed argument to support your veiled white supremacist beliefs and the notion that the voodoo of Islam is somehow inferior to the identical voodoo of christianity.
Does it bother you that plenty of christians on here can actually sympathize with the way that the Muslims reacted in this event, and agree that the christians in this story were 100% wrong?
For what other groups does your irrational and morally-bankrupt hatred bias you against rationally judging such situations? Buddhists? Hindus? other sects of christians? What about the Mormons and Seventh Day Adventists? Do you consider them christians?
Why is chrisitianity so superior to Islam? Please provide a rational argument for this.