Christians Attacked In Michigan!

[cybrsage]

You can't catch Jewish or Muslim from the food, don't worry. (not that I think either group would take you)

Coke is Kosher.

 

[CrackRabbit]

Coke is Kosher.

I thought that was true only if it was made with cane sugar instead of corn syrup, or that just a Passover thing?

Edit: The corn syrup cans of Coke in my fridge do not have a Kosher mark, but the root beer I have that is made with cane/beet sugar has one.

 

[Incorruptible]

You can't catch Jewish or Muslim from the food, don't worry. (not that I think either group would take you)

I wouldn't want to belong to the group though

 

[CrackRabbit]

I wouldn't want to belong to the group though

But you belong to the group already.

 

[hectorsanchez16]

ouch

 

[WelshBloke]

But you belong to the group already.

No, he's on "the list".

 

[Pr0d1gy]

So this thread has dissolved into a bunch of people telling Incor he isn't good enough to be a Jew?

I really wish we would just cut ties with Isreal. Isreal should not exist anyways. It is an abomination according to their own religious texts.

 

[Incorruptible]

So this thread has dissolved into a bunch of people telling Incor he isn't good enough to be a Jew?

I really wish we would just cut ties with Isreal. Isreal should not exist anyways. It is an abomination according to their own religious texts.

I dont have ties with Israel, remember the Torah tells Jews they are in exile and aren't allowed to have there own country

 

[Pr0d1gy]

I dont have ties with Israel, remember the Torah tells Jews they are in exile and aren't allowed to have there own country

That's what I said. They aren't even supposed to have a state, so we know the people running Isreal are a bunch of Zionists, and we support them as if they were the holiest of the holy, when they are an abomination within their own religion. It's sad, really.

 

[Incorruptible]

That's what I said. They aren't even supposed to have a state, so we know the people running Isreal are a bunch of Zionists, and we support them as if they were the holiest of the holy, when they are an abomination within their own religion. It's sad, really.

Agreed, But back to the thread its fully of hypocrisy, people were all over supporting the OWS movement but now that its the other sides turn they want to restrict freedom of speech and not allow them. Typical leftist idiots

 

[Pr0d1gy]

Agreed, But back to the thread its fully of hypocrisy, people were all over supporting the OWS movement but now that its the other sides turn they want to restrict freedom of speech and not allow them. Typical leftist idiots

I honestly think all the religions are a problem. I mean Christians say God created the Earth when the Sumerians and Egyptians were already living on this planet and had documented history. Muslims say every other religion must be destroyed. Judaism says they should not have a state.

They're all mysoginistic, archaic bullshit. If someone isn't hurting anyone, and it is adults involved, whose right is it to smash their rights?

I feel like the Christians were wrong in this instance because they clearly went out looking to antagonize people who were peacefully assembling, and that is playing with fire. Obviously, the Muslims were wrong for using violence also. There is no winner here and, once again, organized religion proves it is the real enemy of mankind.

 

[CrackRabbit]

Agreed, But back to the thread its fully of hypocrisy, people were all over supporting the OWS movement but now that its the other sides turn they want to restrict freedom of speech and not allow them. Typical leftist idiots

The only hypocrisy in this thread is your own.

I honestly think all the religions are a problem. I mean Christians say God created the Earth when the Sumerians and Egyptians were already living on this planet and had documented history. Muslims say every other religion must be destroyed. Judaism says they should not have a state.

They're all mysoginistic, archaic bullshit. If someone isn't hurting anyone, and it is adults involved, whose right is it to smash their rights?

I feel like the Christians were wrong in this instance because they clearly went out looking to antagonize people who were peacefully assembling, and that is playing with fire. Obviously, the Muslims were wrong for using violence also. There is no winner here and, once again, organized religion proves it is the real enemy of mankind.

To save you the trouble of having to read everything, basically Incorruptible is an Islamophobe, possible white supremacist, troll.
Who in addition to being the previously listed things, quite possibly failed high school English classes.
The rest of the thread is making fun of the bigoted redneck.

 

[alzan]

Agreed, But back to the thread its fully of hypocrisy, people were all over supporting the OWS movement but now that its the other sides turn they want to restrict freedom of speech and not allow them. Typical leftist idiots

As long as Ruben Israel, his street preachers and followers go to an event with the intent of provoking/inciting violence or riot I will continue call them out for what they are. If they want to speak freely and not behave like assholes they're more than welcome. But I won't hold my breath for that to happen; they know which events to go to and they know how far they can push the envelope to get the maximum amount of support and sympathy from the Islamophobes and extremist Christians who are their fans.

This whole thread is nothing more than another of your anti-Islam ravings and responses to those ravings; it has nothing whatsoever to do with the OWS Movement or any other populist uprising. You seek nothing more than the right to be as confrontational as possible within the confines of the law and then go running to the courts when you've achieved your unstated goal of provoking someone to violence or riot.

Typical rightist idiot.

 

[Incorruptible]

I honestly think all the religions are a problem. I mean Christians say God created the Earth when the Sumerians and Egyptians were already living on this planet and had documented history. Muslims say every other religion must be destroyed. Judaism says they should not have a state.

They're all mysoginistic, archaic bullshit. If someone isn't hurting anyone, and it is adults involved, whose right is it to smash their rights?

I feel like the Christians were wrong in this instance because they clearly went out looking to antagonize people who were peacefully assembling, and that is playing with fire. Obviously, the Muslims were wrong for using violence also. There is no winner here and, once again, organized religion proves it is the real enemy of mankind.

I agree that certain religions cause too much problems, I dont think the Christians should have done that,

BUT I DONT HAVE THE RIGHT TO STOP THEM AND NEITHER DOES ANYONE ELSE BECAUSE WHILE PEOPLE MAY DISAGREE WITH THEM ITS STILL FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND MUST BE PROTECTED

 

[alzan]

I agree that certain religions cause too much problems, I dont think the Christians should have done that,

BUT I DONT HAVE THE RIGHT TO STOP THEM AND NEITHER DOES ANYONE ELSE BECAUSE WHILE PEOPLE MAY DISAGREE WITH THEM ITS STILL FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND MUST BE PROTECTED

The only thing that will stop them is a court ruling against them in a lawsuit. It's freedom of speech up to a certain point; given this occurrence and and some of Ruben Israel's past escapades it wouldn't be hard to convince judge and jury that these Christians were, with malice aforethought attempting to incite violence or riot.

Of course Ruben Israel and his ilk could decide all on their own to stop being colossal asshats but they won't; they get a buzz-thrill by feeling persecuted. Guess it makes them feel closer to their savior, or something.

 

[Pr0d1gy]

I agree that certain religions cause too much problems, I dont think the Christians should have done that,

BUT I DONT HAVE THE RIGHT TO STOP THEM AND NEITHER DOES ANYONE ELSE BECAUSE WHILE PEOPLE MAY DISAGREE WITH THEM ITS STILL FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND MUST BE PROTECTED

Look man, if we don't allow Occupy to peacefully protest I'm not sure why you think we should allow people to antagonistically protest.

 

[CrackRabbit]

I agree that certain religions cause too much problems, I dont think the Christians should have done that,

BUT I DONT HAVE THE RIGHT TO STOP THEM AND NEITHER DOES ANYONE ELSE BECAUSE WHILE PEOPLE MAY DISAGREE WITH THEM ITS STILL FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND MUST BE PROTECTED

So what you're saying is that women should be allowed to wear Hijabs and Burquas in public because it is freedom of speech.

Got it. Glad you made your stance on that clear.

 

[Incorruptible]

Look man, if we don't allow Occupy to peacefully protest I'm not sure why you think we should allow people to antagonistically protest.

But OWS should be allowed to protest peacefully, and these people were peaceful, it was the religious nut bars who attacked the Christians

 

[alzan]

But OWS should be allowed to protest peacefully, and these people were peaceful, it was the religious nut bars who attacked the Christians

No, the pig's head on a pole and signs declaring that Muhammed was a pedophile and that Islam is a religion of blood and murder being carried by the "Christians" are a clear indication that Rubin Israel and his group were there to provoke a riot and/or incite to violence.

 

[blankslate]

Agreed, But back to the thread its fully of hypocrisy, people were all over supporting the OWS movement but now that its the other sides turn they want to restrict freedom of speech and not allow them. Typical leftist idiots

Sorry but righties and lefties have used the "free speech zone" method of keeping protesters far away from the people who don't want embarrassing video recording of protesters in their faces, or along a route they're traveling.

 

[cybrsage]

I thought that was true only if it was made with cane sugar instead of corn syrup, or that just a Passover thing?

Edit: The corn syrup cans of Coke in my fridge do not have a Kosher mark, but the root beer I have that is made with cane/beet sugar has one.

Just a Passover thing.

 

[cybrsage]

The only thing that will stop them is a court ruling against them in a lawsuit. It's freedom of speech up to a certain point; given this occurrence and and some of Ruben Israel's past escapades it wouldn't be hard to convince judge and jury that these Christians were, with malice aforethought attempting to incite violence or riot.

Of course Ruben Israel and his ilk could decide all on their own to stop being colossal asshats but they won't; they get a buzz-thrill by feeling persecuted. Guess it makes them feel closer to their savior, or something.

This is it. The police should have protected the Christians (though I use that term loosely here) from their attackers. The attackers should then have filed suit against the Christians.

 

[cybrsage]

I honestly think all the religions are a problem. I mean Christians say God created the Earth when the Sumerians and Egyptians were already living on this planet and had documented history.

This is not true - only some Christians believe this.

If you want to see a problem, look at the USSR's attempt to destroy religion. Atheism was very evil and killed millions in its goal of domination. This shows that religion and anti-religion is not really the problem. Humanity itself is the problem.

 

[RampantAndroid]

Atheism was very evil and killed millions in its goal of domination.

You try to say one blanket statement is wrong and then use another blanket statement.

 

[Incorruptible]

This is it. The police should have protected the Christians (though I use that term loosely here) from their attackers. The attackers should then have filed suit against the Christians.

Agreed but what do you mean filed suit against the Christians