So, he isnt going to post any sources for his previous statements. He's just going to keep responding to other things so the post ends up on a previous page.
Classy.
still waiting for secret jihad muslims that have infiltrated the US government.
Keith Maurice Ellison (born August 4, 1963) is the U.S. Representative for Minnesota's 5th congressional district, serving since 2007. He is a member of the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, the Minnesota state Democratic Party affiliate. The district centers on Minneapolis and surrounding suburbs. He was re-elected in 2010.[2] Ellison is a co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus for the 112th Congress.
He is the first Muslim[3][4] to be elected to the Congress. He is also the first African American elected to the House from Minnesota
In 2009 and 2011, Ellison had a 100% rating from NARAL Pro-Choice America indicating a pro-choice voting record.[36][37] In 2009, Ellison condemned the assassination of Dr. George Tiller by an anti-abortion activist, saying "There is no room in America to ‘justify’ murder in the name of ideological differences. I condemn the act committed against Dr. Tiller as well as those who take comfort from his death."[38]
In an interview with the BBC's Program Outlook, on Nov. 12th 2010, Ellison was asked to describe his constituents. He answered: "The district I represent is the kind of district where you can have a Member of Congress stand up for religious tolerance and against religious bigotry, against anyone, but also stand up for the rights of gays too.
Are you not watching whats happening in Europe, they are slowly winning and gaining influence and in certain areas they control everything
Exactly what is it that I'm supposed to be watching?
So are you saying that half of Europe's non-Muslim population has been either converted to radical Islam or killed? That would constitute "winning" in the eyes of radical Islam.
Also, you've gone from "winning right now" in your response to a reply to Original Earl to "slowly winning and gaining influence" in your response to me. Are you moving the goalposts or just unable to remember (or look up) what you've previously posted. Just curious.
In what certain areas of Europe do radical Muslims "control everything"? Please post the source and try to link a source other than jihadwatch or Stormfront.
Still waiting for the source to back up your claim "40% of Muslims in Britain want Sharia law."
There are no- go areas for cops and gays/Jews because they face violence, the Holocaust isn't being taught because it offends them. There are more honor killings and people face death threats for insulting islam.
There are no- go areas for cops and gays/Jews because they face violence, the Holocaust isn't being taught because it offends them. There are more honor killings and people face death threats for insulting islam.
Making nebulous claims and statements without proof really doesn't help your argument.
Not that I think I'm going to get a response backed by sources but:
Where exactly are these "no go" areas for cops, gays and Jews (and is it worse if you're all three combined)?
The Holocaust offends radical Muslims? I would think they'd celebrate the Holocaust, unless they're just jealous that they didn't think of it first.
First things first . Those were not Christians. They were men looking to start trouble. Hence the reason the police acted as they did . Come into my Web said the spider to the fly
As does the fly have the right to enter the spiders web . Its not smart and is trouble for the fly but a meal for the spiderIt doesn't matter if the men weren't Christian they have rights
As does the fly have the right to enter the spiders web . Its not smart and is trouble for the fly but a meal for the spider
That is totally different, those Christians had freedom of speech just like the westboro baptist church
Thats exactly why they did it . They have the right . But its like the fly not a smart move . These men went in looking to cause trouble
There not teaching about the Holocaust and Crusades
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-445979/Teachers-drop-Holocaust-avoid-offending-Muslims.html
You two were meant to debate each other
From the article:
"The researchers gave the example of a secondary school in an unnamed northern city, which dropped the Holocaust as a subject for GCSE coursework.
The report said teachers feared confronting 'anti-Semitic sentiment and Holocaust denial among some Muslim pupils'.
It added: "In another department, the Holocaust was taught despite anti-Semitic sentiment among some pupils.
"But the same department deliberately avoided teaching the Crusades at Key Stage 3 (11- to 14-year-olds) because their balanced treatment of the topic would have challenged what was taught in some local mosques."
A third school found itself 'strongly challenged by some Christian parents for their treatment of the Arab-Israeli conflict-and the history of the state of Israel that did not accord with the teachings of their denomination'.
The report concluded: "In particular settings, teachers of history are unwilling to challenge highly contentious or charged versions of history in which pupils are steeped at home, in their community or in a place of worship."
But Chris McGovern, history education adviser to the former Tory government, said: "History is not a vehicle for promoting political correctness. Children must have access to knowledge of these controversial subjects, whether palatable or unpalatable.""
It looks like it's not departmental or system-wide policy, just a few individual teachers who are afraid of causing problems in a few classes. So while it's concerning and should be dealt with on an individual basis; it also looks like yet another one of your Islamophobic "mountains out of molehills".
Also notice that a few Christian parents have been giving one school grief over the way it teaches about the Arab-Israeli conflict. If it's good for the goose...
If a religion can't stand up to scrutiny it's not much of a religion, is it?
Still waiting for sources for some of your past claims.
Yeah, but for whom would we cheer? A dual knockout, perhaps?
Not surprised to see you once again justifying it in some way
Not surprised to see you once again justifying it in some way