Chrome may be fast... except it makes my work PC hang loading pages constantly. Meh.
Plus, no adblock.
Firefox FTW.
Plus, no adblock.
Firefox FTW.
You sound like youre 12. Im not going to sit and keep explaining why its a sign of bloat when one browser uses twice the memory as another with the same sites open. Anyone with half a mind would realize its not about the memory, its about what it signifies. I like FireFox. I used it 90% of the time. I, however, am not going to be a idiotic fanboi like you and give excuses to things that are starting to become issues. Thats not how Firefox became popular.
Have fun with your trolling.
You're the one acting childish here, trying to throw personal insults around.
If you want to call firefox bloated because it used 75MB more memory, go ahead. But, it is still as fast if not faster in everyday use. So, why does it matter if it uses a little bit more memory if it doesn't slow anything down? Sure it had memory leak problems in the past that caused memory usage to get way out of hand, but FF using 150MB while Chrome uses 75MB doesn't mean FF is bloated or slow. Even if I were to acknowledge it was bloated, what then? It still is not a problem, as it doesn't cause any slow downs.
I wouldn't expect anything less from you :thumbsdown:Troll troll troll your boat gently down the stream! Fanboi fanboi fanboi fanboi lie is but a dream.
What? Cant hear you over your theme song!
Opera fanboys are the worst human beings on the planet.this thread has made me hate everyone who uses Opera.
I wouldn't expect anything less from you :thumbsdown:
So mature. Can't even give a real reply at all.
Opera fanboys are the worst human beings on the planet.
lol now the little boy is calling me son. That's classic. You called it a bloated piece of shit, and said it's an issue that it uses so much memory. It is not. That is all. But hey, keep crying about that extra 75MB you lost.Why bother from your replies? It reaks of stupidity and thick mindedness. I made my point. Anyone, firefox fans like I am or not would understand the implications. You're simply playing the devils advocate and doing a poor job at that.
Bottom line, son; then need to tighten up their code. The. End.
lol now the little boy is calling me son. That's classic. You called it a bloated piece of shit, and said it's an issue that it uses so much memory. It is not. That is all. But hey, keep crying about that extra 75MB you lost.
Firefox is rowing more inefficient than IE.
(stop means stop now not stop after loading the page!)
"Growing" not "is".Uh no not even close IE is still the slowest piece of crap. Every time I have to load it up for something (which thankfully is quite rare) it takes forever to load, doesn't listen to what I tell it half the time (stop means stop now not stop after loading the page!) and seems to have a fun time grinding the hard drive while loading web pages. IE just plain sucks, has for a long time, and still does.
I owe SunSamari an apology. I didn't realize just how bloated and inefficient firefox is.
http://pics.bbzzdd.com/users/mb27/browsers.png
Here they are side by side with the same tabs open. FF has adblock installed but turned off to be fair.
Chrome: Total of 90,656K
Firefox: 93,600K
Almost a whole 3MB. That's even worse than I thought. Mozilla is doomed.
Opera fanboys are the worst human beings on the planet.