Chrysler finally killing off the Grand Caravan?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Vdubchaos

Lifer
Nov 11, 2009
10,411
10
0
Crossovers are basically less-bad-looking minivans. Meh.

You are crazy

Room for 7? Easy access of sliding doors......low cost?

Don't forget these minivans are the best bang for the buck vehicles on the road (when you look at materials you get/per dollar)........also by far the most versatile vehicles and best people movers.
 

Fritzo

Lifer
Jan 3, 2001
41,892
2,135
126
I've owned 4 Caravans/Town and Counties over my life. They're awful, awful vehicles, but they're cheap, have a lot of features, and basically disposable. The Town and Country we have right now is completely decked out with an entertainment system, a HO 4.0L V6, and all the other toys, and was only $28K new.

The build quality on the Caravan and T&C is simply embarrassing however. They use plastics in the trim you'd expect to see in cars from the 1980's, the brakes are about 2 sizes too small resulting in pad changes every 20K miles or so, the cheap tires it comes with won't stick, and the powerful engine makes you peel out in even the driest conditions...it's not a good vehicle and I would never buy one without a warranty.

However, with all the features they're about $20K cheaper than a comparable Honda or Toyota, and GM and Ford don't really have anything that competes anymore.

So, like I said, I've owned 4 since the mid-90s
 

Vdubchaos

Lifer
Nov 11, 2009
10,411
10
0
Back in the day you could get an AWD Previa. I still see 'em around. They even made them with superchargers and 5-speed manuals (according to my owners manual).

I used to have one. Not supercharged or 5 speed

By far the best/nicest van Toyota ever made.

We had 2 sunroofs, kids loved that thing (I did too).

I had to get rid of it mostly due to sliding door trouble (wife's fault hehe) and seat belts that didn't lock in (safety). Also we had some accident damage and exhaust was shot.

Wasn't worth investing into, but it broke my heart to get rid of her....
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
Back when, you could get a Turbo 2.5L and a manual trans in the Caravan. 150 horses...
 

thedarkwolf

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 1999
9,003
111
106
150hp but it only weighed a little over 3k pounds at least according to the scales at the dump. That was the fully loaded power everything version minus rear seats. It moved pretty good with a few real cheap mods. The new ones weigh 4300lbs to 4500lbs depending on options. They do have a bit more power though.
 

Gillbot

Lifer
Jan 11, 2001
28,830
17
81
We had them for fleet vehicles and it was awesome. Can hold a lot of people or cargo if needed, VERY flexible. They tried to replace them with the Journey and those were a disaster. I really hope this proves untrue as they still sell like wildfire and are one of the best soccer-mom machines out there.
 

mmntech

Lifer
Sep 20, 2007
17,504
12
0
There's certainly an argument in favour of minivans. Especially for cargo purposes. You really can't beat Dodge's Stow-and-Go as a light work vehicle. Not to mention they're much cheaper than full sized cargo vans.

However, your average Joe doesn't want them for precisely the reasons brought up. For men, minivans are seen as emasculating. So they do indeed want something that looks more bad-ass. Women/soccer moms like SUVs because they sit high up and have AWD. They view them as being safer.

During the winter months, we rarely kept minivans in stock simply because there was no demand for them. We might get one person in a month wanting one out of hundreds of reservations. People preferred the 7-passenger SUVs. They were willing to overlook the drawbacks for the reasons mentioned above. Those things went like hotcakes. Minivans were popular during the summer for road trips. Long weekends especially. We'd get big demand in July and August but that dropped off as soon as school started. As such the company only leased the vans on a factory buy-back program. They weren't worth purchasing. Resale value on them sucked even if you bought them at fleet rate.

Same applies for the factories. While Dodge may sell a lot of cheap Caravans, profit margins can't be that great on them. Especially when you're selling such a big vehicle for the price of a Civic. It's why a lot of automakers dumped their low cost truck offerings. The Ford Ranger was still a popular truck when it was discontinued. But you can't make money off a sub-$20k pickup.
 

Fritzo

Lifer
Jan 3, 2001
41,892
2,135
126
150hp but it only weighed a little over 3k pounds at least according to the scales at the dump. That was the fully loaded power everything version minus rear seats. It moved pretty good with a few real cheap mods. The new ones weigh 4300lbs to 4500lbs depending on options. They do have a bit more power though.

The traction control can't handle the engine though. I'll squeal the tires in my T&C if I don't gently hit the gas pedal. The van sounds impressive when you floor it, and at 280HP it gets those 2 tons of metal to 60 in about 8 seconds. It even has a semi-manual transmission (you can shift gears when in Drive by moving the shifter left or right).

You can almost see a cloud of brake dust when you stop on the brakes though. Chrysler seems to be famous for putting in overpowered engines and not upgrading the other components to match.
 

bradly1101

Diamond Member
May 5, 2013
4,689
294
126
www.bradlygsmith.org
I used to have one. Not supercharged or 5 speed

By far the best/nicest van Toyota ever made.

We had 2 sunroofs, kids loved that thing (I did too).

I had to get rid of it mostly due to sliding door trouble (wife's fault hehe) and seat belts that didn't lock in (safety). Also we had some accident damage and exhaust was shot.

Wasn't worth investing into, but it broke my heart to get rid of her....

I bought mine used. Yeah the sunroofs are great, especially traveling through the Sequoia at sunset. My favorite thing is the rotating captain chairs. You turn those around and the big rear moonroof is right above you, then you lay the 3rd row flat and you have a big two person, reclining lounge. Then you back up to your favorite view and open the tailgate and have a picnic. It's like being outside, but SUPER comfortable.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,425
8,388
126

i didn't say they stopped selling the flex. the explorer is a flex that looks a bit more SUVish in order to increase sales is what i said. i guess if you wanted to be really accurate you'd say that both are ford D3/4 platform vehicles, along with the taurus and the taurus x/freestyle wagon that preceded both current wagons.

ttac put it best, i think
Imagine, for a moment, you are a plant. Well, not just any plant. You are Robert Plant, and everywhere you go, people want you to sing “Stairway to Heaven”. I’d rather not, you tell them. Never liked that one much, to be honest. We’ve a much better song that I’d much rather sing. Called ‘Kashmir’, dontcha know. Much better, that one. For years, you refuse to perform the song. You cancel a proposed Led Zeppelin reunion because the promotion company insists, positively insists, that you play “Stairway”. You’d rather play “Kashmir”. And since you don’t really need the money, that’s the end of it.

I suspect the people who run Ford can sympathize a bit with Mr. Plant. Their “Stairway” is a four-door SUV called the Explorer. You might have heard of it. Sold a bunch, that Explorer, even though it was always kind of a hokey tune, a Ranger truck with a cap and a couple rows of plastic-leather seats, perched sky-high on underinflated Firestones.

The Explorer was never a truly outstanding answer to the family-wagon question, so a couple years back Ford created the Flex, which is an outstanding answer. It should have made the Explorer obsolete, but there were two problems. It wasn’t really an SUV, and it wasn’t an Explorer. And since Ford, unlike Zeppelin’s Golden God, needs the money…
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2011/02/review-2011-ford-explorer-xlt-awd/
 
Last edited:

thedarkwolf

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 1999
9,003
111
106
The traction control can't handle the engine though. I'll squeal the tires in my T&C if I don't gently hit the gas pedal. The van sounds impressive when you floor it, and at 280HP it gets those 2 tons of metal to 60 in about 8 seconds. It even has a semi-manual transmission (you can shift gears when in Drive by moving the shifter left or right).

You can almost see a cloud of brake dust when you stop on the brakes though. Chrysler seems to be famous for putting in overpowered engines and not upgrading the other components to match.

At least you have traction control. My modified 89 turbo would smoke the tires from a roll and try to rip the steering wheel out of your hands lol. While I had my 89 caravan I also had an 89 5.0l mustang. Now you want to talk about some crappy brakes. My van stopped a better than that mustang and by a good bit.
 

Fritzo

Lifer
Jan 3, 2001
41,892
2,135
126
At least you have traction control. My modified 89 turbo would smoke the tires from a roll and try to rip the steering wheel out of your hands lol. While I had my 89 caravan I also had an 89 5.0l mustang. Now you want to talk about some crappy brakes. My van stopped a better than that mustang and by a good bit.

Ha! I had an '84 Mustang GT. How did performance cars from that period NOT have 4 wheel disc brakes? The rears were still drum brakes! Which leads to a rather humorous yarn from my storied youth:

The 1984 charcoal gray Mustang GT with T-Tops was the first car I purchased. It was sleek, shiny, perhaps a bit too fast for my age, and the insurance premiums cost more than the car payment. It was also the least mechanically sound vehicle to hit the road...ever. I learned everything I know about car repair from my 4 year love/hate affair with this Mustang.

In the summer of 1987, it was time for a brake job. I had never changed brakes before, so I purchased the equivalent of a YouTube guide at the time...a "Chilton Manual"...and proceed to muddle my way through fuzzy black and white pictures and poorly worded instructions.

My neighbor, a notorious red-neck chain smoker, walked up when he saw me struggling to get the rear brake cover off of the rusted drum assembly. He showed me how to take a hammer and pound on edges until the cover came loose. I pounded away, and the cover fell to the ground---creating a mushroom cloud of black brake dust. The dust covered my clothes, face, hair...everything.

My neighbor takes a huge puff of his cigarette, blows the smoke out the side of his lips, and then gives me the sage advice: "By the way...don't breathe that stuff. It causes cancer."
 

bradly1101

Diamond Member
May 5, 2013
4,689
294
126
www.bradlygsmith.org
Ha! I had an '84 Mustang GT. How did performance cars from that period NOT have 4 wheel disc brakes? The rears were still drum brakes!

After my mom got divorced she celebrated her independence by getting an '84 fully loaded, 5-speed Supra. It had discs all around and stopped and went like a monster.
 

foghorn67

Lifer
Jan 3, 2006
11,885
53
91
i didn't say they stopped selling the flex. the explorer is a flex that looks a bit more SUVish in order to increase sales is what i said. i guess if you wanted to be really accurate you'd say that both are ford D3/4 platform vehicles, along with the taurus and the taurus x/freestyle wagon that preceded both current wagons.

ttac put it best, i think

http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2011/02/review-2011-ford-explorer-xlt-awd/

Wow, agreed. Great way of illustrating that point.
 

slag

Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
10,473
81
101
Parent? I had a dodge caravan for 12 years and am a single dude without kids. Best beater I've ever had. I almost never had the rear seats in the thing and used it like a truck, a much more comfortable and nice to drive truck. It hauled my mtn bikes, dogs, and pretty much anything else I could shove in there which was a lot more than you could a SUV.

Really, the only thing you are missing out on with the van is towing capacity. 3800 lbs vs about 5.5-7k for an SUV from the early 90s.

And 4wd if you need or want it, but some minivans had 4wd.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |