- Oct 9, 2004
- 9,215
- 6,818
- 136
A CIA assessment delivered to the Senate has determined that Russia orchestrated hacks against the DNC, Podesta and others specifically to get Trump elected.
This isn't a full assessment from every agency -- that's what the recently ordered investigation is for. But if the sources are accurate (and this is the Washington Post, which has a track record for leaks), it's huge. Previous analysis had suggested only that Russia was trying to cause chaos. But specifically trying to boost Trump?
I'm not sure exactly what the law obligates in a case like that, but that's serious democracy-is-in-danger material. I figure it would at least prompt an investigation into the extent of the Trump campaign's connections to Russia. Could it even invalidate the election? It's hard to imagine even the most diehard Republican being comfortable with the election results if they knew that Russia had played everyone for fools.
One thing's for sure: if this holds up, it makes WikiLeaks' actions that much more reprehensible. I used to be fine with WikiLeaks when it seemed relatively neutral and interested solely in transparency, but it certainly wasn't here. At best, it was manipulated by the Russians and didn't check the source of its info; at worst, it knowingly served as a Russian weapon.
This isn't a full assessment from every agency -- that's what the recently ordered investigation is for. But if the sources are accurate (and this is the Washington Post, which has a track record for leaks), it's huge. Previous analysis had suggested only that Russia was trying to cause chaos. But specifically trying to boost Trump?
I'm not sure exactly what the law obligates in a case like that, but that's serious democracy-is-in-danger material. I figure it would at least prompt an investigation into the extent of the Trump campaign's connections to Russia. Could it even invalidate the election? It's hard to imagine even the most diehard Republican being comfortable with the election results if they knew that Russia had played everyone for fools.
One thing's for sure: if this holds up, it makes WikiLeaks' actions that much more reprehensible. I used to be fine with WikiLeaks when it seemed relatively neutral and interested solely in transparency, but it certainly wasn't here. At best, it was manipulated by the Russians and didn't check the source of its info; at worst, it knowingly served as a Russian weapon.