Chiropteran
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2003
- 9,811
- 110
- 106
Leave your car parked at home and carpool to work. Then tell your boss you need the company to pay for a cab ride home so you can get your car to drive to the client.
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: spacejamz
Originally posted by: DomS
you're getting free food? I'd keep quiet.
I don't plan any claiming any lunches since I would have had to buy lunch if I would have gone into the office...
I started driving out there in June and didn't claim any of lunchs when I was out there (although 2 of the 4 weeks I was out there, lunch was provided for us anyway)...
You make no sense. You won't claim lunch as an expense when you're onsite of a client but you want to be compensated above the 20 miles for going to the client's location.
Originally posted by: MixMasterTang
The IRS would let you deduct the whole 60 miles on your taxes, but what your employer reimburses you will differ. Give me a minute and I'll link the appropriate information from the IRS.
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: MixMasterTang
The IRS would let you deduct the whole 60 miles on your taxes, but what your employer reimburses you will differ. Give me a minute and I'll link the appropriate information from the IRS.
if the IRS allows all 60 miles i'm going to guess that what he gets is 20 miles reimbursement and then deduct the other 40, assuming he itemizes.
Originally posted by: spacejamz
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: spacejamz
Originally posted by: DomS
you're getting free food? I'd keep quiet.
I don't plan any claiming any lunches since I would have had to buy lunch if I would have gone into the office...
I started driving out there in June and didn't claim any of lunchs when I was out there (although 2 of the 4 weeks I was out there, lunch was provided for us anyway)...
You make no sense. You won't claim lunch as an expense when you're onsite of a client but you want to be compensated above the 20 miles for going to the client's location.
I just think that any miles/wear and tear on my car above my normal commute to work should be 'claimable'...it isn't about the money (which would be around $120 a month). As I stated earlier, it is more a principle thing since the company is going 'green' but now chooses to 'penalize' me by not allowing me to claim the miles I save by carpooling.
I am not going to get blacklisted by corporate as this is just a 'friendly' challenge between me and the boss...see earlier post about this...
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: MixMasterTang
The IRS would let you deduct the whole 60 miles on your taxes, but what your employer reimburses you will differ. Give me a minute and I'll link the appropriate information from the IRS.
if the IRS allows all 60 miles i'm going to guess that what he gets is 20 miles reimbursement and then deduct the other 40, assuming he itemizes.
The IRS would only allow him to deduct the 20 miles (commute beyond his normal commute to his normal office).
Originally posted by: HardcoreRobot
i dont see the twist, the policy is pretty clear. you get to claim 20 miles for each trip you take out there. dont overcomplicate it. or be greedy.
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Sorry but your company does not compensate you currently for commuting to your normal office, why should it now compensate you b/c you are now carpooling to it? You are only able to be reimbursed for 20 miles which is beyond your normal commute to go to the client's location.
Your argument is beyond weak. Your boss must have a good sense of humor to put up with you.
Originally posted by: MixMasterTang
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: MixMasterTang
The IRS would let you deduct the whole 60 miles on your taxes, but what your employer reimburses you will differ. Give me a minute and I'll link the appropriate information from the IRS.
if the IRS allows all 60 miles i'm going to guess that what he gets is 20 miles reimbursement and then deduct the other 40, assuming he itemizes.
The IRS would only allow him to deduct the 20 miles (commute beyond his normal commute to his normal office).
Please read info at http://www.irs.gov/publications/p17/ch26.html and look at Figure 26-B and tell me where you came up with that.
Between regular or main job and temporary work location, Always deductible.
Originally posted by: dullard
Sure, have your employer change that policy from 20 miles to 60 miles. That is fine. But don't complain if he/she also changes how much they pay you from $0.59 to $0.19 at the same time.
Originally posted by: spacejamz
Normally, I work out of an office located 20 miles from home. However, I was assigned to a special project that requires me to drive to a client's site once a week that is 30 miles from home.
Our corporate policy is that you only claim mileage greater than would your normal drive to work would have been, which I totally agree with. FWIW, the reimbursement for mileage is $0.59/mile, so claiming 60 miles (roundtrip) is about $35 each time I drive out there.
However, I carpool to work with 3 other people, so I only drive to work one week out of the month (4 total people in car pool so we each drive one week out of the month). In my opinion, I should be able to claim the full 60 miles three out every four weeks since I would not have had to drive to the office those weeks because of the carpool. My boss still wants me to claim only 20 miles (10 mile difference each way on the roundtrip to the client)...
I used the example of someone who rides the bus to work everyday. Since they never drive their car to office, should this person claim 20 miles or 60 miles? I say 60 miles since that is 60 extra miles they are putting on their car because of work but my boss says 20.
I will talk to my boss about this again tomorrow, but just wanted other opinions...it is more of a principle issue to me, especially when the company is just starting a 'green' initiative which includes promoting carpooling...
so what do you guys think?
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: MixMasterTang
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: MixMasterTang
The IRS would let you deduct the whole 60 miles on your taxes, but what your employer reimburses you will differ. Give me a minute and I'll link the appropriate information from the IRS.
if the IRS allows all 60 miles i'm going to guess that what he gets is 20 miles reimbursement and then deduct the other 40, assuming he itemizes.
The IRS would only allow him to deduct the 20 miles (commute beyond his normal commute to his normal office).
Please read info at http://www.irs.gov/publications/p17/ch26.html and look at Figure 26-B and tell me where you came up with that.
Text version of Figure 26-B
Between regular or main job and temporary work location, Always deductible.
That's 20 miles.
Originally posted by: sao123
Originally posted by: spacejamz
Normally, I work out of an office located 20 miles from home. However, I was assigned to a special project that requires me to drive to a client's site once a week that is 30 miles from home.
Our corporate policy is that you only claim mileage greater than would your normal drive to work would have been, which I totally agree with. FWIW, the reimbursement for mileage is $0.59/mile, so claiming 60 miles (roundtrip) is about $35 each time I drive out there.
However, I carpool to work with 3 other people, so I only drive to work one week out of the month (4 total people in car pool so we each drive one week out of the month). In my opinion, I should be able to claim the full 60 miles three out every four weeks since I would not have had to drive to the office those weeks because of the carpool. My boss still wants me to claim only 20 miles (10 mile difference each way on the roundtrip to the client)...
I used the example of someone who rides the bus to work everyday. Since they never drive their car to office, should this person claim 20 miles or 60 miles? I say 60 miles since that is 60 extra miles they are putting on their car because of work but my boss says 20.
I will talk to my boss about this again tomorrow, but just wanted other opinions...it is more of a principle issue to me, especially when the company is just starting a 'green' initiative which includes promoting carpooling...
so what do you guys think?
Someone who rode the bus all 60 miles would recieve 0 compensation... as this is only for miles driven in your own vehicle. The company is responsible to reimburse you for mileage put on your vehicle only above and beyond what you would normally travel to and from work.
Originally posted by: spacejamz
Originally posted by: dullard
Sure, have your employer change that policy from 20 miles to 60 miles. That is fine. But don't complain if he/she also changes how much they pay you from $0.59 to $0.19 at the same time.
$0.59 is the standard rate mileage rate set by the IRS, so I, along with any other employee who claims mileage would complain...
It went up from $0.51 to $0.59 on July 1, 2008...
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: MixMasterTang
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: MixMasterTang
The IRS would let you deduct the whole 60 miles on your taxes, but what your employer reimburses you will differ. Give me a minute and I'll link the appropriate information from the IRS.
if the IRS allows all 60 miles i'm going to guess that what he gets is 20 miles reimbursement and then deduct the other 40, assuming he itemizes.
The IRS would only allow him to deduct the 20 miles (commute beyond his normal commute to his normal office).
Please read info at http://www.irs.gov/publications/p17/ch26.html and look at Figure 26-B and tell me where you came up with that.
Text version of Figure 26-B
Between regular or main job and temporary work location, Always deductible.
That's 20 miles.
Between home and temporary work location, Deductible if you have a regular or main job at another location
Originally posted by: spacejamz
Originally posted by: sao123
Originally posted by: spacejamz
Normally, I work out of an office located 20 miles from home. However, I was assigned to a special project that requires me to drive to a client's site once a week that is 30 miles from home.
Our corporate policy is that you only claim mileage greater than would your normal drive to work would have been, which I totally agree with. FWIW, the reimbursement for mileage is $0.59/mile, so claiming 60 miles (roundtrip) is about $35 each time I drive out there.
However, I carpool to work with 3 other people, so I only drive to work one week out of the month (4 total people in car pool so we each drive one week out of the month). In my opinion, I should be able to claim the full 60 miles three out every four weeks since I would not have had to drive to the office those weeks because of the carpool. My boss still wants me to claim only 20 miles (10 mile difference each way on the roundtrip to the client)...
I used the example of someone who rides the bus to work everyday. Since they never drive their car to office, should this person claim 20 miles or 60 miles? I say 60 miles since that is 60 extra miles they are putting on their car because of work but my boss says 20.
I will talk to my boss about this again tomorrow, but just wanted other opinions...it is more of a principle issue to me, especially when the company is just starting a 'green' initiative which includes promoting carpooling...
so what do you guys think?
Someone who rode the bus all 60 miles would recieve 0 compensation... as this is only for miles driven in your own vehicle. The company is responsible to reimburse you for mileage put on your vehicle only above and beyond what you would normally travel to and from work.
your reply doesn't make sense...If you normally put zero miles on your car and now you have to put 60 miles a day because of work, you just stated that company is responsible for anything above the normal mileage of zero.
Originally posted by: Chiropteran
What if you are working from home, and then your boss tells you you have to drive to a client site?
Example 1. You regularly work in an office in the city where you live. Your employer sends you to a one-week training session at a different office in the same city. You travel directly from your home to the training location and return each day. You can deduct the cost of your daily round-trip transportation between your home and the training location.
Example 2. Your principal place of business is in your home. You can deduct the cost of round-trip transportation between your qualifying home office and your client's or customer's place of business.
Example 3. You have no regular office, and you do not have an office in your home. In this case, the location of your first business contact is considered your office. Transportation expenses between your home and this first contact are nondeductible commuting expenses. Transportation expenses between your last business contact and your home are also nondeductible commuting expenses. Although you cannot deduct the costs of these first and last trips, you can deduct the costs of going from one client or customer to another.
There is absolutely no law or regulation forcing them to use the IRS mileage rate.Originally posted by: spacejamz
Originally posted by: dullard
Sure, have your employer change that policy from 20 miles to 60 miles. That is fine. But don't complain if he/she also changes how much they pay you from $0.59 to $0.19 at the same time.
$0.59 is the standard rate mileage rate set by the IRS, so I, along with any other employee who claims mileage would complain...
It went up from $0.51 to $0.59 on July 1, 2008...
Originally posted by: Chiropteran
And what if your office is in the opposite direction?
Office 10 miles west of home, client site 20 miles east of office.
If you go directly to the client site, it's only a 10 mile trip but you can't reimburse any of it, while if you drive to work first it's a 30 mile trip total and 20 miles are reimbursable? It all seems pretty backwards if you ask me.