Originally posted by: Rollo
Originally posted by: lexmark
Originally posted by: akugami
His card, yes, his conscience, yes. However, when you RMA something, it drives up the cost of doing business (yes I know they set aside a certain percentage of cards for RMA). However, every time a manufactorer deals with RMA'ed products it drives up the cost of doing business and that means that I have to pay more in the long run for new hardware (video cards in this case).
Most video card warranties are void if you take off the default heatsink or overclock. The fact that someone took the time to install a water cooling system usually means they will overclock. Granted not always but usually.
Not being belligerent, but could you show proof showing that there is a direct corelation of price increases of video cards being a direct result from the amount of RMA's completed? I've never seen it.
You obviously have never been in a business course, or had anything but a "McJob", and apparently had no good role models.
I will spell it out for you:
Returns are projected based on anticipated failure rates, determined by testing. The anticipated failure rate and cost of warranty work/replacement is factored into the price of the product. This cost is part of the firms "overhead" or "cost of doing business", like wages, real estate, machinery, etc..
Companies have a sale price that is X percent over their cost of doing business, from which they hope to derive a PROFIT. The profit is used for R&D, raises, bonuses, better equipment etc..
Let's say for the sake of argument BFGs profits run 10% of sales.
When people like you shorten a products life by overvolting it or modding it, then return it fraudulently, you skew BFGs numbers. Now the profit they were supposed to make on one card is cut in less than half, because they have to give you another.
So next year BFG sees they only made 5% instead of their forecasted 10%. Do you think they say "Oh nuts. I hope we don't have as many returns this year so we can make our 10%"?
Nope, they raise their prices to accomodate their increased cost of doing business, so they make us all pay for people like YOU.
There's no "magic money tree": BFG, ATI, etc. are no different from your lemonade stand when you were a kid. If it cost you $.05 a glass to make the lemonade, you charged $.10. If a bunch of little doofuses set their cups on the ground till ants got in it, and then made you give them a new glass, wouldn't you charge more per glass the next time around, or not sell lemonade at all?
That's what you are- the guy putting his glass on the ground then asking for a new one. If your conscience is clear, you have none, and would be ashamed if you did.
BTW- If any MBAs are out there, I know this is over simplified, but I doubt anyone would disagree increased overhead due to fraud results in nothing good for anyone in the long run?