"ok guilty, once again, i dont really care that the movie used props. Sure virtual reality files systems do not exist, and sure it was about a bunch of kids rollerblading in new york, etc. All i questioned was the existance of a REAL clear laptop. Also, the idea that you would have to dumb down your point is assinine. I understand what you are saying completely in your first post. All that I am saying is i dont care what you say. You have no worth to me, and your opinion has no bearing on what i think."
Thats all you questioned, fine, I answered the question and I answered it correctly. Five or six other people agreed with me in a one way or another. Maybe you didnt request my opinion of the movie but the question made me think of it from a few years back and how amusing it is to me now. Thats really regardless though, you made a big deal out of 3 words as if I went out of my way to insult you.
And Saltparrot, the question was about the reallity of clear laptops in the market, read the rest of the posts and you will see people compare the idea to real laptops that you can buy, not to the past existance of a singular theoretical prop. Plus, your assumption that because you can see the screen in motion prooves nothing, they could have easily pre-recorded a sequence and just displayed it onto an LCD via a hidden wire or hidden playback device in the case with no actual input from the actor.
I beleive you both mistook my comments on a movie that is amusing to anyone who knows a decent amount about computers as some kind of offensive to cain's query about the existance of the item. I didnt mean it that way, and theres no need to flame me for it.