Well that's two things out of everything he said. You at least gave it the old college try.
I should point out, I don't give a flip about Morris, don't know much of anything about him, and the fact that he worked with the Clintons for years is actually a big negative in my view, because I think the Clintons surround themselves with dirtbags. However, I still don't see where he's in any less position to know about Hillary's past than a bunch of random fools on a message board who just want to whitewash anything negative about their D hero.
The Watergate thing- true, she wasn't fired. But it's telling what her boss had to say about her- basically that she was a lying, theiving, coniving dirtbag, who was willing to use the Constitution like so much toilet paper. Probably the only reason she wasn't fired, was Nixon resigned and there was no more purpose for the impeachment comittee. So I guess Hillary supporters can claim a technicality on that one, but how she's described by her boss is TELLING. Let's just sweet that under the rug, shall we?
The rapist case: the only 'rebuttal' is just saying she didn't purposefully take on the case. I don't remember, but did Morris make that claim?
Did she make up a riduclous 'Blame the Victim' defence? YES.
Did she later laugh in an interview, in effect saying she knew the defendant was guilty. YES.
So that's two kinda-sorta addressed. How about some of the ones that are real doucebaggy- the bribe and kickback allegations and such, using her political clout to enrich herself and Bill. Any FACTS disproving any of that?