(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
CLINTON: I did not e-mail any classified material to anyone on my e-mail. There is no classified materials.
I am confident that I never sent nor received any information that was classified at the time.
I had not sent classified material nor received anything marked classified.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
WALLACE: After a long investigation, FBI Director James Comey said none of those things that you told the American public were true.
CLINTON: Chris, that's not what I heard Director Comey say, and I thank you for giving me the opportunity, in my view, clarify.
Director Comey said my answers were truthful, and what Ive said is consistent with what I have told the American people, that there were decisions discussed and made to classify retroactively certain of the emails.
I was communicating with over 300 people in my e-mailing. They certainly did not believe and had no reason to believe that what they were sending was classified.
Now, in retrospect, different agencies come in and say, well, it should have been, but that's not what was happening in real time.
WALLACE: But in a congressionally hearing on July 7th, Director Comey directly contradicted what you had told the public.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
REP. TREY GOWDY, R-S.C., CHAIR, BENGHAZI COMMITTEE: Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her e-mails either sent or received. Was that true?
JAMES COMEY, FBI DIRECTOR: Thats not true.
GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said, "I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email. There is no classified material." Was that true?
COMEY: There was classified material e-mailed.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
WALLACE: He directly contradicted --
CLINTON: Well, I --
WALLACE: Well, let me just say -- he not only directly contradicted what you said, he also said in that hearing that you were extremely careless and negligent.
CLINTON: Well, Chris, I looked at the whole transcript of everything that was said, and what I believe is, number one, I made a mistake not using two different e-mail addresses. I have said that and I repeat it again today. It is certainly not anything that I ever would do again.
I take classification seriously. I relied on and had every reason to rely on the judgments of the professionals with whom I worked. And so, in retrospect, maybe some people are saying, well, among those 300 people, they made the wrong call.
At the time, there was no reason in my view to doubt the professionalism and the determination by the people who work every single day on behalf of our country.
I did notice the clips show were abruptly cut each time Comey said no. May have added some context but at no time did FBI director say she was truthful.
Question I would have asked. Who's idea was it to create the private server?
I did notice the clips show were abruptly cut each time Comey said no. May have added some context but at no time did FBI director say she was truthful.
Question I would have asked. Who's idea was it to create the private server?
I'm not at all surprised that she lied even when confronted with the evidence, but I am surprised she had the ovaries to sit down with Chris Wallace. She's known for only submitting to interviews with tame reporters (the DNC hack shows just HOW tame) so this took some guts.
Director Comey said my answers were truthful
Must be nice to have the adoring throng of left wing media on your side to ignore your blatant lies and instead focus on other dumb things.
Her issue coverage was proportionally twice that of Trump, three times that of Cruz, and four times that of Sanders. In terms of tone, it was 84 percent negative, which was twice that of Trump, two-and-two-thirds that of Cruz, and five times that of Sanders. Even the non-scandal portion of Clintons issue coveragewhat she was saying on trade, jobs, foreign policy, and the likewas reported more negatively than positively. Clinton was the only one of the major candidates whose policy platform generated an unfavorable balance of news coverage.
It's one of those things that if you care about it enough to elect Hilary, not much can be done.
He treated her quite fairly and gently imo. Did you watch the interview?Interesting choice of Fox, but makes perfect sense. Fox is going to ask all the hostile questions, and Fox viewers are not undecideds, so it will make little difference.
Interesting choice of Fox, but makes perfect sense. Fox is going to ask all the hostile questions, and Fox viewers are not undecideds, so it will make little difference.
Yeah because if the media is known for one thing it's adoring Hillary Clinton. lol.
http://shorensteincenter.org/pre-primary-news-coverage-2016-trump-clinton-sanders/
But yes, tell me more jokes about how the media was biased in favor of the Clinton campaign.
First, it's research done by an ultra lefty institution. Not surprising.
Second, that's from the primaries, where she was up against someone even further to the left of her. Now that she's going against the evil righties, the media is perfectly aligned in her corner, as expected.
First, it's research done by an ultra lefty institution. Not surprising.
Second, that's from the primaries, where she was up against someone even further to the left of her. Now that she's going against the evil righties, the media is perfectly aligned in her corner, as expected.
Of course! Because if that weren't true then how would you maintain that bubble?