I'm not going to take the time to cite, copy, paste, and highlight for you only to watch you twist the conclusions and then argue minutia as you always do.
So far we've had you misrepresent the findings of a study, hypocritically apply the findings you made up to only 2007 and not the current year, link blindly to a wiki article you clearly hadn't read, and then declare other people to be dishonest.
Thank you for your contribution to this thread as always!