What a load of bullshit... ROFL And you fools line up to buy it!
What about those who aren't Democrats? Given the Island of Misfit Candidates assembled by the GOP, I think We Americans must unite behind whoever wins the Democratic nomination. I'd prefer that be Sanders, but Clinton works too.
It's perfectly clear you've never paid attention to what she says, just to what's said about her.
Repeating rightwing agitprop about Hillary doesn't help Bernie but it hurts Dems in general. When Repubs throw up a smokescreen & claim there's a fire you repeat every word of it.
Actually, I do listen. She either says nothing, like that quote, or she makes right wing talking points.
On actual issues, not social issues, she is a right wing republican through and through!
Nice to see you admit she's liberal on social issues. So, uhh, what "actual issues" are you talking about where you claim she's a right wing republican?
Immigration? Taxes? Financial regulation? The role & size of govt? Diplomacy over force? What?
Throughout her tenure, she believed that America’s governing elite was justified in running a secret program of mass surveillance and waging secret drone warfare.
“A few weeks after Hillary Clinton was sworn in as secretary of state in early 2009, she was summoned to Geneva by her Swiss counterpart to discuss an urgent matter. The Internal Revenue Service was suing UBS AG to get the identities of Americans with secret accounts,” The Wall Street Journal reported. “If the case proceeded, Switzerland’s largest bank would face an impossible choice: Violate Swiss secrecy laws by handing over the names, or refuse and face criminal charges in U.S. federal court. Within months, Mrs. Clinton announced a tentative legal settlement—an unusual intervention by the top U.S. diplomat. UBS ultimately turned over information on 4,450 accounts, a fraction of the 52,000 sought by the IRS.”
Later UBS paid her husband seven figures in speaking fees.
In addition, she was paid lavishly to give speeches to some of the most powerful corporations on the planet. She earned more on three Goldman Sachs speeches than many Americans earn in their lives. Forbes estimated her individual worth at $30 million.
She later became New York’s junior senator; after the September 11 terrorist attacks she voted with the establishment for the Authorization for the Use of Military Force, the Patriot Act, and the Iraq War. She joined the Senate Prayer Breakfast. When the Democratic establishment opposed gay marriage, she did, too.
Actually, I do listen. She either says nothing, like that quote, or she makes right wing talking points.
On actual issues, not social issues, she is a right wing republican through and through!
LoL. Playing ignorance?
Fock rights, just kill kill kill.... and spy spy spy spy
Filthy fucking bitch intervenes for the monied class and gets a kickback from the bank. NOICE!
LoL. She actually opposed GAY marriage?! WTF?
That's actually not true. I'm certainly no fan of the Hildabeast, but as a Senator the only times she significantly deviated from Sanders' voting record was where there was a political price to be paid for voting with Sanders or where it was a question of increasing the power of government. She is definitely a hard-core progressive, she's just an authoritarian, Hillary-first hard-core progressive. That is hardly unusual in the progressive movement. There are a few places where they commonly overlap with right wing Republicans, such as empowering government with domestic spying, undercutting the little guy with unrestrained illegal immigration, and interventionist foreign policy, but not all that many places. In the progressive movement, it is Sanders who is the outlier, not Mrs. Clinton.Actually, I do listen. She either says nothing, like that quote, or she makes right wing talking points.
On actual issues, not social issues, she is a right wing republican through and through!
Bernie takes Wisconsin! I voted for the first time since 2000. Exciting stuff!
With Bernie winning 8 of the last 8 states it is time for Hillary to drop out. In fairness she did bring zero issues to the table and we appreciate it, but she is just prolonging the inevitable and preventing Bernie from focusing on the Republicans,
FWIW, I took it as parody/sarcasm.Can you explain why the person who has gotten the most votes and has a nearly insurmountable delegate lead should drop out?...
I was saying that tongue in cheek but if you want a serious reply here it is-
Hillary's delegate count represents 55% of the total so far.
Bernie's delegate count represents 45% of the total so far.
However, Hillary's Superdelegate count represent 93.8% of the total so far,
and Bernie's Superdelegate count represent only 6.2%.
If Superdelegates were proportional to the delegate count today the result would be:
Hillary: 1,549
Bernie: 1,250
With 1,966 still up for grabs.
The current Superdelegate plus Delegate count shows a 25% difference between the two candidates, but if the counts were absolutely proportional the difference would actually only be 11%.
Regarding Wisconsin- RealClearPolitcs records seven polls for Wisconsin within the last week and a half or so. It looks like all seven polls underestimated his vote beyond the margin of error. One was twenty points off, and the average was beaten by about ten points. The probability of this happening by chance is remote (way less than 1 in a million), so the polls were flawed and so is any model based on assuming their accuracy.
Sanders is now outperforming his "impossible path to the nomination" by 10%. New York will likely not be great for him since they shut down new registrations in October of last year.
With Bernie winning 8 of the last 8 states it is time for Hillary to drop out. In fairness she did bring zero issues to the table and we appreciate it, but she is just prolonging the inevitable and preventing Bernie from focusing on the Republicans,
Forget the superdelegates, even with pledged delegates his path to the nomination is extremely, extremely hard. He basically needs to win almost every state from here on out by double digits. A substantial loss in NY or PA basically makes it impossible for him to win just from a math perspective.
So again it's not impossible, it's just very unlikely. Clinton is further ahead of Sanders at this point than Obama was ahead of Clinton. The math is brutal.
Hi Guurn,
Good switcheroo, even if it is for fun. However, I don't much care for the picture you displayed. Anyway, it is extremely rewarding to see yet another Bernie fan on these pages.
I still have plenty of issues with Bernie but I feel like we know more of his stances on the issues than we do on any other candidate for either party. Before someone links Hillary s homepage I've got serious trust issues with her. Does anyone actually think she will do what she says? Does anyone actually think Trump will either? Cruz frightens me because I think he will do what he says he will do.
I prefer Sanders by light years over any Republican candidate, but he just doesn't seem to have a realistic plan for governance.