considering Bernie just won the 2nd round of the Nevada caucus, this throws a wrench in just how "enthusiastic" Hillary supporters really are (at least in Nevada)
http://usuncut.com/politics/bernie-wins-nevada-democratic-caucus/
http://heavy.com/news/2016/04/berni...-las-vegas-delegates-arrested-clinton-videos/
Oh you must be talking about her stating:
Oh I do believe her when she says she will attack Iran if she becomes president. It is one of the reasons that it is imperative to me that she not become president.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/hillary-clinton-if-im-president-we-will-attack-iran/5460484
Being able to enact HORRIBLE policy is not a positive in my book, it apparently is in yours.
Skull Fossil Suggests GOP Republicans Diverged From Modern Humans Earlier Than Thought
You need to do a little better research into the people presenting you your news. Nothing about that site gives any sense of unbiased credibility. For fuck's sake, one of the top articles is:
It took me all of five seconds to copy/paste this quote into google, and find numerous sources. It's not as bad as it sounds, but it's still kind of bad. She certainly lives up to the title of warhawk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O894bXmqqGU
On a side note, I like the title of that article. It's quite clever, especially for right wing circles.
It took me all of five seconds to copy/paste this quote into google, and find numerous sources. It's not as bad as it sounds, but it's still kind of bad. She certainly lives up to the title of warhawk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O894bXmqqGU
On a side note, I like the title of that article. It's quite clever, especially for right wing circles.
It took me all of five seconds to copy/paste this quote into google, and find numerous sources. It's not as bad as it sounds, but it's still kind of bad. She certainly lives up to the title of warhawk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O894bXmqqGU
On a side note, I like the title of that article. It's quite clever, especially for right wing circles.
It’s hard to know where to start in tallying up the explosive revelations in the Panama Papers, an analysis of leaked documents from global law firm Mossack Fonseca revealed by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ). Yes, we’ve known for a while now that the shadow financial system was growing. But it’s another thing to take in 11.5 million documents showing the way in which Mossack Fonseca was working with big name financial groups like UBS, HSBC, Société Générale, and many others to help elites from the Communist Party leadership of China, to soccer star Lionel Messi, to global financiers hide cash in offshore havens around the world.
It’s just the tip of a much bigger iceberg. “The size of the leak is unprecedented, but the tricks Mossack Fonseca has allegedly used for its clients are neither new nor surprising. Anonymous shell companies and the failure of governments to require lawyers, corporate service companies, or banks to collect beneficial ownership information on clients leave the door wide open for dirty money to flow around the globe virtually unhindered,” says Heather Lowe, the Director of Government Affairs for Global Financial Integrity, a Washington DC-based consultancy.
To me, this is one of the key issues at work in the U.S. presidential election. Voters know at a gut level that our system of global capitalism is working mainly for the 1 %, not the 99 %. That’s a large part of why both Sanders and Trump have done well, because they tap into that truth, albeit in different ways. The Panama Papers illuminate a key aspect of why the system isn’t working–because globalization has allowed the capital and assets of the 1 % (be they individuals or corporations) to travel freely, while those of the 99 % cannot. Globalization is supposed to be about the free movement of people, goods, and capital. But in fact, the system is set up to enable that mobility mainly for the rich (or for large corporations). The result is global tax evasion, the offshoring of labor, and an elite that flies 35,000 feet over the problems of nation states and the tax payers within them.
And here is why we need Sanders and not a stooge for the bankers. The whole corrupt system has been exposed. This is the group that Clinton travels within. It is the group she will fight to the death to protect. She is an unabashed corporate elitist.
http://time.com/4280864/panama-papers-capitalism/
Can't resist the opportunity to tear down Hillary, huh?
You do Bernie no favors in that. It can easily be put in positive terms, like this-
"And here is why we need Sanders- he's spoken out many times about corruption at the top. He won't cave to the rich & powerful banking interests & will fight for honesty & fair dealing at all levels."
Or just go with the Bernie Bros' version of Benghazi.
These are simple facts, not personal attacks.
Greetings,
Bernie can win. If he doesn't it's not because Hillary played dirty, it's either because she got more votes than Bernie or the super-delegates went with her in favor of the Democratic establishment, although highly unlikely.
best regards,
swampy
Thank you for being a sane Bernie supporter. So far Hillary has won more votes and more pledged delegates. She is extremely likely to win the nomination. If that didn't happen though I would support Sanders over any Republican candidate in a second.
I feel that a lot of Sanders supporters have forgotten that Hillary and Bernie have a lot more in common than what they disagree on. Hillary supporters did the same thing in 2008. (PUMAS)
Do you really think that Bernie Sanders would not engage in military operations against Iran if it were to full on attack Israel? His stance is nearly identical to Hillary's. Does that make him a warhawk?
What about those who aren't Democrats? Given the Island of Misfit Candidates assembled by the GOP, I think We Americans must unite behind whoever wins the Democratic nomination. I'd prefer that be Sanders, but Clinton works too.Greetings,
We Democrats must unite behind whoever wins the nomination and do everything possible to ensure a Democratic Congress.
best regards
swampy
Thank you for being a sane Bernie supporter. So far Hillary has won more votes and more pledged delegates. She is extremely likely to win the nomination. If that didn't happen though I would support Sanders over any Republican candidate in a second.
I feel that a lot of Sanders supporters have forgotten that Hillary and Bernie have a lot more in common than what they disagree on. Hillary supporters did the same thing in 2008. (PUMAS)
Bernie and Hillary have absolutely nothing in common. They are extreme polar opposites.
Bernie doesn't want the power, and only cares about the issues. Hillary only cares about the power, and doesn't want to concern herself with the issues.
She is a corrupt shill for corporate interests. It is enough to know that Christopher Hitchens despised her. He has newer quotes about how she has taken donations from corrupt foreign interests and the oligarchical financial institutions. I will look them up if I think of it.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...2008/01/the_case_against_hillary_clinton.html
What about those who aren't Democrats? Given the Island of Misfit Candidates assembled by the GOP, I think We Americans must unite behind whoever wins the Democratic nomination. I'd prefer that be Sanders, but Clinton works too.
Of course, but first things first. Hell- it's what she preaches on the campaign trail- harmony, respect, finding common purpose, shaping the future in a positive direction.