Clinton says he didn't use warrantless wiretaps

[Starbuck1975]

I don't want to go too far off topic but since the door has been opened -- what is this nonsense about President Clinton being a "known liar"???

Perhaps it is because we should expect more out of our elected leaders...that a sitting President lied, under oath, about something as trivial as a blowjob brings into question his honesty on more pressing or significant matters.

It is not an unreasonable jump in logic to assume that Clinton's past tendencies are a fairly strong indicator that we should take anything his says with a grain of salt.

 

[ntdz]

And Bill Clinton has never lied before has he? *cough* Monica

 

[Jhhnn]

The whole song and dance wrt Clinton's honesty about this issue is moronic. With the Bushies in the Whitehouse, they could easily prove him a liar, if he were in this instance...

But they haven't... why not?

Golly gee whiz- maybe it's because Slick Willie is telling the truth...

It's a no-brainer, something that anybody not in thrall to the idolatry of Neo-Con-ism can figure out even if drunk...

 

[her209]

We have yet to see proof of Clinton authorizing wiretapping without requiring a search warrant (thus far in this thread).

 

[Harvey]

Originally posted by: ntdz
And Bill Clinton has never lied before has he? *cough* Monica

Bushwhacko has already admitted using warrantless wiretaps, and there are a lot of qualified legal opions, including lots of Senators and law professors, saying that's a felony or three.

If Clinton isn't telling the truth about not doing it, it would also be a felony so, either you have to prove it, or you're just running your mouth.

 

[ntdz]

Originally posted by: Harvey

Originally posted by: ntdz
And Bill Clinton has never lied before has he? *cough* Monica

Bushwhacko has already admitted using warrantless wiretaps, and there's a lot of qualified legal opion, including lots of Senators and law professors, saying that's a felony or three.

If Clinton isn't telling the truth about not, doing it, it would also be a felony so, either you have to prove it, or you're just running your mouth.

Could you rewrite your post, your misuse of commas makes it difficult to understand.

 

[Harvey]

Originally posted by: ntdz
Could you rewrite your post, your misuse of commas makes it difficult to understand.

Just one extra comma, which I fixed, and a case error (plural versus singular) which I also corrected.

Feel better?

Now, do you feel up to managing a competent reply to what I said in the first place?

 

[imported_Condor]

Originally posted by: 1EZduzit

Originally posted by: Condor

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: Condor
Too bad. Maybe he could have headed off 9/11 and retired a hero.

Here, you need to read this.

I wouldn't participate in a liberal circle jerk. Why would I read one?

Implying that you would participate in a conservative circle jerk??

And just how many of those have you seen me in? Don't do circle jerks - unlike many here.

 

[sandorski]

Originally posted by: Condor

Originally posted by: 1EZduzit

Originally posted by: Condor

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: Condor
Too bad. Maybe he could have headed off 9/11 and retired a hero.

Here, you need to read this.

I wouldn't participate in a liberal circle jerk. Why would I read one?

Implying that you would participate in a conservative circle jerk??

And just how many of those have you seen me in? Don't do circle jerks - unlike many here.

Sure man. That must be why you bring it up so often.

 

[Pabster]

Originally posted by: Condor
I wouldn't participate in a liberal circle jerk. Why would I read one?

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

 

[maluckey]

Of course all the posters like to call this as proof of something. Bill also lied under oath .....Twice. I wouldn't believe him any more than I believe Bush, or Chavez. They all lie. It's axiomatic.