glenn1
Lifer
- Sep 6, 2000
- 25,383
- 1,013
- 126
That is in essence false equivalency.
I don't think you know what the term "false equivalency" means then. If something or someone can't meet my minimum requirements then it's not really relevant how much less of the requirements one of them meets. You're the one trying to create an actual false equivalency by conflating "acceptable candidates" and "electable candidates." Just because you're falsely trying to turn this election into a binary choice doesn't mean it is. Gary Johnson is better option than either Trump or Clinton. I disagree almost 100% with everything she stands for but Jill Stein is a better option than Trump or Clinton. There is no argument, poll, endorsement, or anything else you could say or do that would lead me to vote for either Clinton or Trump and there's millions just like me. If that means that your preferred candidate loses then tough shit, next time select an acceptable candidate.