Clinton "Scandals" vs. Trump "Scandals"

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
What is a better beat down, Trump loses to Hillary by a few more points, or Trump loses to the combined total of the third party candidates?

Which reflects the reality that Trump might win if enough people vote third party?

If that's not your desired outcome then you probably shouldn't promote it.
 

Cozarkian

Golden Member
Feb 2, 2012
1,352
95
91
Which reflects the reality that Trump might win if enough people vote third party?

If that's not your desired outcome then you probably shouldn't promote it.

If enough people vote third party the third party might win. The danger of accidentally electing Trump only exists because some people buy into the false dichotomy fallacy promoted by the two major parties.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
Which reflects the reality that Trump might win if enough people vote third party?

If that's not your desired outcome then you probably shouldn't promote it.

I'm not scared if Trump wins so threatening me with it doesn't help. I'm not scared if Clinton wins so threatening me with it doesn't help either. The mistake some of you are making is that you presume we are not expressing sincerely held beliefs and are just putting on a show like folks who make a big point of saying how they hate Nickelback.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
There appears to be this sense of entitlement, especially on the left. As if whatever piece of garbage they put out, people should just vote for it ...because look....the ugly right wing! Obama coming out and saying to black people that he would be "personally insulted" if blacks didn't come out and voted in large numbers for Hillary. That is some sense of entitlement. It was condemned by some old time black leaders as well.

More bullshit. You already referred to her opponent as a certified idiot & witnessed the awful truth of that Monday night.

But you persist in tearing down Clinton as if she's not the only hope of keeping that idiot out of the Oval Office.

Is that supposed to show us how smart you are, or what?
 
Reactions: MongGrel

rommelrommel

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2002
4,389
3,120
146
Hillary tends to be wrong a lot by my standards. She is dishonest and a flip flopping populist who will do anything for power.

Donald on the other hand tends to be not even wrong. He doesn't even understand the conversation and the odd time he has a correct solution it's dumb luck.

The only legitimate appeal of trump, in my opinion, is if you believe that the system is irreparably broken. If you believe that, Trump might just be the man to burn the system down.
 

Mursilis

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2001
7,756
11
81
Gotta love all the cozying up to the "She's just as Bad!" trope so popular among delusionists. It's absurdist bullshit.

The Trump candidacy is a national disgrace as are his followers. The Republican party is also a disgrace for having encouraged & nurtured all the ugliness, the bitterness, the bigotry & the astoundingly shitty attitudes & gross misperceptions of their base for decades. Now it boiled over on them under the encouragement of Trump. He tells them what they really want to hear & turns the dial up to 11.

WTF did they think would happen? Did they not examine the possible unintended consequences of fanning hate & discontent? Or did they not care?

WTF did they think would happen in the wake of the top down class warfare victories they scored over and over?

And so why did the Left have to give us Clinton (a seriously flawed candidate who actually might lose to the Orange Lunatic) when they could've nominated Sanders, an actual decent human being, as far as I can tell? It's like the GOP decided to punt this election by picking the worst possible candidate, and Dems have tried to hand it right back by nominating their worst possible candidate, Clinton. Even O'Malley would've been a better choice! But of course with the Left, identity politics HAS to prevail! Anyone who doesn't support the (seriously flawed) woman is sexist, so let's all vote for her. Sanders would be wiping the floor with Trump.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
If enough people vote third party the third party might win. The danger of accidentally electing Trump only exists because some people buy into the false dichotomy fallacy promoted by the two major parties.

If pigs had wings, they'd fly. The chances of enough people voting for either third party candidate to win are precisely zero this election & we both know it.

Keeping that in mind, it's obvious that you're concern trolling to advance Trump's chances whether you'll admit it or not.
 
Reactions: MongGrel

Cozarkian

Golden Member
Feb 2, 2012
1,352
95
91
Maybe they a
And so why did the Left have to give us Clinton (a seriously flawed candidate who actually might lose to the Orange Lunatic) when they could've nominated Sanders, an actual decent human being, as far as I can tell? It's like the GOP decided to punt this election by picking the worst possible candidate, and Dems have tried to hand it right back by nominating their worst possible candidate, Clinton. Even O'Malley would've been a better choice! But of course with the Left, identity politics HAS to prevail! Anyone who doesn't support the (seriously flawed) woman is sexist, so let's all vote for her. Sanders would be wiping the floor with Trump.

Maybe they are returning the favor from 2008 when the Democrats put up two candidates that could actually lose the post-Bush election and the Republicans responded by nominating a failed prior candidate that had become less popular than the first time he ran and decided not to actually vet the vice presidential nominee?
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
And so why did the Left have to give us Clinton (a seriously flawed candidate who actually might lose to the Orange Lunatic) when they could've nominated Sanders, an actual decent human being, as far as I can tell? It's like the GOP decided to punt this election by picking the worst possible candidate, and Dems have tried to hand it right back by nominating their worst possible candidate, Clinton. Even O'Malley would've been a better choice! But of course with the Left, identity politics HAS to prevail! Anyone who doesn't support the (seriously flawed) woman is sexist, so let's all vote for her. Sanders would be wiping the floor with Trump.

Yes, let us live in the past & in the shoulda-bins. Let us bemoan water under the bridge & spilled milk. Let us descend into bitter obstinacy rather than tending to the task at hand & working for a better future.

Let's just pretend that we don't have any more sense than the Trumpsters, shall we?
 

dainthomas

Lifer
Dec 7, 2004
14,613
3,459
136
Kinda dumb if you ask me. Only Trump or Clinton is going to be president. Might as well pick the one closer to representing your interests instead of throwing it away on a third party (plus, Johnson and Stein are both loons for different reasons).

It is.

Trump is like a narcissistic W without the semblance of a moral compass. And if he wins they'll inherit the legacy of failure that Nader voters in 2000 started.
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
Someone who has decided to vote for Stein or whoever doesn't "owe themselves" sh!t to compare Trump and Clinton, that they're voting someone other than Trump/Clinton is ALREADY evidence they have an open mind. That's simply someone who is a partisan for one of them attempting to perpetuate the "worse of two evils" narrative. How about treating your fellow voters with the respect they deserve to make up their own damn minds. Stein and Johnson ARE better candidates than Clinton or Trump and deserve votes.
RoboClinton and
More bullshit. You already referred to her opponent as a certified idiot & witnessed the awful truth of that Monday night.

But you persist in tearing down Clinton as if she's not the only hope of keeping that idiot out of the Oval Office.

Is that supposed to show us how smart you are, or what?
Highly unlikely at this point, but if Trump were to win, it will be interesting to see where Democrats lay the blame.
 

emperus

Diamond Member
Apr 6, 2012
7,782
1,540
126
For people who continually decry false equivalence you sure love creating them. And do you really think "Hillary is better than Hitler" is going to change the mind of someone saying they would never vote for her?

Again, was it a false equivalency during Bush v. Gore. Remember we actually went to war and a lot of people died.

I would hope you love your country that you live in, love the lives of the people in it and know when to get off your high horse and actually take a stance against someone wholly un-equipped to be President, in fact too dangerous to be president. But, no, you'll sit it out and let grown ups make that hard decision. Thank You.

It's equally odd and disturbing listening to a lot of people in this thread act like they somehow don't live in this country and will be somehow removed from the dangers a President Trump poses.

In this election I have more respect for the Trump supporters than those who vote 3rd party. At least the majority of Trump supporters just don't know any better.
 

Mursilis

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2001
7,756
11
81
On ourselves for failure to bring people to reason, for failure to counter the divisive raving idiocy spewed from the right wing noise machine for decades.

Your blinders are amazing - they truly must be industrial-grade. The Dems ignore the flyover country for years, and then wonder why they're angry and defecting to the GOP.
 
Reactions: gamervivek

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Your blinders are amazing - they truly must be industrial-grade. The Dems ignore the flyover country for years, and then wonder why they're angry and defecting to the GOP.

Gawd. We haven't ignored it- we've just been unable to bring those folks to reason. What's happened in all that is that the Job Creators have had their way with those people because they keep voting to have it that way. Witness Kansas. Witness Louisiana. Witness Mississippi, fer crissakes. The place would revert to delta ooze w/o federal subsidies.
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
On ourselves for failure to bring people to reason, for failure to counter the divisive raving idiocy spewed from the right wing noise machine for decades.
You've got President Obama, Michelle Obama, Bill Clinton, Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders and an infinite cast of surrogates stumping for Hillary. Trump is shooting from the hip and grossly incompetent. How is this a close election? At some point you need to accept that maybe you bet on the wrong horse.
 

squarecut1

Platinum Member
Nov 1, 2013
2,230
5
46
In this election I have more respect for the Trump supporters than those who vote 3rd party. At least the majority of Trump supporters just don't know any better.

This argument would have more substance if the opponent of Trump was someone half decent at least. People vote FOR someone, not against someone. That is fundamental to any human choice for that matter. It is precisely why Hillary is struggling among the young and even what are called minorities. But in reality, she will become President (in reality, the race isn't close...it is almost inconceivable for Trump to get to 270). So I don't even know what is causing this angst among her supporters. Big ado about nothing.
 

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,189
14,102
136
Two nieces supported Bernie. One nephew supported Kasich. All three of them are hundred percent that they will not be voting for either Hillary or Trump - two being in closely contested swing states. That I think is more common among the young people - who can see the charade more clearly. I think a lot of them will either be voting 3rd party or not voting at all.

It happens in basically every election that a good chunk of people who tell pollsters they intend to vote third party in fact end up voting R or D. I think we'll see more than usual third party voting this year, but it isn't going to be the huge numbers that some people think it will.
 

gamervivek

Senior member
Jan 17, 2011
490
53
91
And so why did the Left have to give us Clinton (a seriously flawed candidate who actually might lose to the Orange Lunatic) when they could've nominated Sanders, an actual decent human being, as far as I can tell? It's like the GOP decided to punt this election by picking the worst possible candidate, and Dems have tried to hand it right back by nominating their worst possible candidate, Clinton. Even O'Malley would've been a better choice! But of course with the Left, identity politics HAS to prevail! Anyone who doesn't support the (seriously flawed) woman is sexist, so let's all vote for her. Sanders would be wiping the floor with Trump.

Pretty obvious that Clinton is a Trump plant who couldn't get past Obama so had to bribe the DNC this time and make it sure that it was her running against Trump.

The only legitimate appeal of trump, in my opinion, is if you believe that the system is irreparably broken. If you believe that, Trump might just be the man to burn the system down.

Maybe Jeff Sessions thought the same after listening to his congressional testimony.

 

Sunburn74

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2009
5,034
2,613
136
If pigs had wings, they'd fly. The chances of enough people voting for either third party candidate to win are precisely zero this election & we both know it.

Keeping that in mind, it's obvious that you're concern trolling to advance Trump's chances whether you'll admit it or not.
Honestly its throwing away your vote. Sadly it seems to most seriously hurt Hillary (honestly I don't think there is even any longer rational discussion to be had with his supporters). Johnson and Stein need to negotiate for policy inclusions, tweaks to the democratic platform, endorse hillary, and then drop out imo. Their policy platforms are not that far apart in honesty.
 

Sunburn74

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2009
5,034
2,613
136
This argument would have more substance if the opponent of Trump was someone half decent at least. People vote FOR someone, not against someone. That is fundamental to any human choice for that matter. It is precisely why Hillary is struggling among the young and even what are called minorities. But in reality, she will become President (in reality, the race isn't close...it is almost inconceivable for Trump to get to 270). So I don't even know what is causing this angst among her supporters. Big ado about nothing.
I think the polls, flawed as they are, make us feel anxious, and the amount of media time trump gets is incredible which makes you wonder if you underestimate his popularity.
 
Reactions: ivwshane

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,333
15,128
136
You've got President Obama, Michelle Obama, Bill Clinton, Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders and an infinite cast of surrogates stumping for Hillary. Trump is shooting from the hip and grossly incompetent. How is this a close election? At some point you need to accept that maybe you bet on the wrong horse.

Yeah or the left realizes that a good portion of this country are idiots and nothing can be done to save them from themselves.
 
Reactions: guachi

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
Yeah or the left realizes that a good portion of this country are idiots and nothing can be done to save them from themselves.
Some of those idiots supported Bill Clinton and/or Obama. Are the millenials not flocking to Hillary idiots? Are the disgruntled blue collar union workers who feel abandoned idiots?

Given how loosely the left uses the term to dismiss their opponents, I sometimes wonder who the true idiots are.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |