the 30k plus emails she's deleted clearly in the attempt to evade the Freedom of Information Act requests and that what we find in those emails and speech transcripts is much more important than whatever is in his tax returns.
I'm not voting for either though, and 99% sure I'm just sitting this one out.
Section 802 of Sarbanes Oxley imposes fines of up to $1,000,000 and prison terms of up to 20 years for knowingly deleting an email with the intent to impede, obstruct or influence a current or future federal investigation.
Dems can shove Clinton up their collective ass. You guys didn't have to support a narcissist that felt the nomination was her birthright, but you did and now you're stuck with someone that actually has to fight to make a person as shitty as Donald Trump look like the worse candidate. I'll laugh my butt off if he wins. Don't think he will, but it will be a yuge source of hilarity.
In retrospect good thing democrats didn't pick a socialist to run given how much half the country hates even the centrists.
Nearly every president that has ever served is understood to have wanted to have been president at some point in their lives. They've never been criticized for having such ambition--in fact, it's a strong virtue.
But not Hillary: she's a narcissist illegitimately clinging to this "birthright" dream of hers that she deserves to be president.
I rather doubt she was deleting email.
How is Hilary a crook and Trump isn't a bigger one? Did you even watch the clip in the first post? Why don't you call for Trump to release his taxes and then all his emails for the last 4 years as well? Wouldn't that make them equal? The false equivalence is maddening. Btw, you do know that Trump University was generally a scam, thus making him a crook who bilked people to pad his wealth.
Gawd. We haven't ignored it- we've just been unable to bring those folks to reason. What's happened in all that is that the Job Creators have had their way with those people because they keep voting to have it that way. Witness Kansas. Witness Louisiana. Witness Mississippi, fer crissakes. The place would revert to delta ooze w/o federal subsidies.
True, so why does the left still insist on subsidizing failure? At some point, if you keep giving money to your drunken uncle, and he keeps spending it on booze or meth, and you STILL keep giving him money, you're as much a part of the problem as he is.
Please. From a perspective such as your own, it's impossible for Dems to field a half decent candidate because you oppose the platform of the Democratic Party.
so because he is a private citizen he gets a pass on all of his potential scandals, including discriminatory housing, trump u, reneging on payment agreements, etc?Trump should be held to the same standards as Hillary when judging his scandals while he was serving the people of the United States as a public servant, all we need is someone to make a list of them.
One that didn't lead Obama into Libya and arm terrorists in Syria would be nice.
It's my disdain / regret for Bush that leads me to oppose Hillary. She is the Neocon platform clear as day.
You show me a picture of Aleppo, and I see a reason to hate those who fueled that fire.
It's more the irony that our first female President got there riding the coat tails of a man who represents the worst aspects of the patriarchy, a womanizer, adulterer and depending on who you ask, also a sexual predator.Nearly every president that has ever served is understood to have wanted to have been president at some point in their lives. They've never been criticized for having such ambition--in fact, it's a strong virtue.
But not Hillary: she's a narcissist illegitimately clinging to this "birthright" dream of hers that she deserves to be president.
That right there reveals, in the starkest and most pointed way possible, the dark underbelly of your political views. You would be comfortable with Trump as President. Tell us, under it all, does he say a lot of what you've been thinking?
More bullshit. It's not like we have hundreds of thousands of troops deployed on combat missions, is it? That we didn't find a constructive way to deal with the threat of nuclear weapons proliferation wrt Iran?
Clinton played a part in all of that.
Donald, of course, thinks that everybody should have nukes.
You seem to be confusing her with Cheney and Haliburton a bit, it seems.
That she is a neocon basically is not exactly a secret. Even Obama and his guys used to say it.
Dems can shove Clinton up their collective ass. You guys didn't have to support a narcissist that felt the nomination was her birthright, but you did and now you're stuck with someone that actually has to fight to make a person as shitty as Donald Trump look like the worse candidate. I'll laugh my butt off if he wins. Don't think he will, but it will be a yuge source of hilarity.
When did the Democratic party become a bunch of warmongers? They have completely abandoned their roots. They are now as bloodthirsty and vicious as the rest of the neocons.
.
Hillary is actually more likely to cause more innocent death and suffering around the world. Lack of empathy is part of her narcissistic nature. She is a well known chicken hawk...the kind of hawks who get others killed while they count their cash and properties, as the Clinton clan loves to do.
Heck even Obama was blasting Hillary on this back in 08.
I rather doubt she was deleting email.
C;mon Jhnn, you did not address his point. Clinton has indicated she wants to take down Assad EVEN if it brings America into conflict with Russia. She makes no secret of this and is a fundamental foundation of her foreign policy plan. That doesn't happen without sending American kids into the meat grinder. What it does guarantee is years or decades more of civil wars. Removing the two most powerful entities leaves a bunch of scrubs to fight a civil war and PLENTY of opportunities for American corporations to made handsome profits on smart bombs.
When did the Democratic party become a bunch of warmongers? They have completely abandoned their roots. They are now as bloodthirsty and vicious as the rest of the neocons. Always supportive of bombing 3rd world nations that are incapable of defending themselves. It amounts to terrorism, we just call it droning. American foreign policy is morally bankrupt and is an apparent force for evil in the world.
There were a lot of people saying the same thing about Nader. And look what Bush gave us. Unless you believe Gore would have invaded Iraq and trashed he Economy.
I can see voting 3rd party in the Romney/Obama election or if you live in a non swing state this election but when choosing to vote third party (or basically not vote) when someone clearly unhinged is running? You deserve all the moral culpability for all the ill he does.
Why should he call for Trump to release his last 4 years of emails? How would that make them equal? Clinton deleted (or had deleted) emails from when she was Secretary of State so she could circumvent FOIA rules in order to hide what she was doing from us the voting public. The optics are that she doesn't want us to see the peddling of influence and access in exchange for Clinton Foundation that took place, but currently this is more in the speculative territory. Trumpnever served as SoS however or any other public office that would fall under it, so he has no obligation nor expectation to release anything.
Voting for Random Minor Party Candidate Number 12 is doing zip to change the system. If it's giving you a warm fuzzy or a sense of accomplishment, then that's fine, but that's all it's doing.
Work to change the system in the long-term, but don't throw away the short-term.