I've consistently asked how racism MEANINGFULLY decided the election. And since it was the Rust Belt that flipped from '08, that is where we should look at the numbers. I've said this every god damned post now. No goal posts moved. And if you don't like my response to your numbers, than quit citing generalized trends woven into your simplified narrative, devoid of actual nuance to what was actually MEANINGFUL.
In other words, who cares how Alabama voted? Raciss gonna race. That's not how Trump won.
The PA example is enlightening. As you said yourself, it was a decline in Black voters that *likely* won Trump that state, not an increase in racist white PAer's. And why was that? Is the problem that black PAer's didn't recognize Hillary for the noble and incorruptible leader she is?
Maybe they saw her for what she really was. No matter what you believe you have to admit it doesn't look good when a week after the election Australia announced that while they are very proud of their humanitarian work with the Clinton Foundation, they won't be giving any more money to them. And two months after that Chelsea's nobody husband that could still manage to raise hundreds of millions for his hedge fund, announced they were closing the fund due to redemptions. None of that is a smoking gun, but it sure looks like quid pro quo to me.
Now we can disagree on our view of the facts, or each other's rational, but when I come on here in good faith to try to hash these important issues out with fellow citizens and I get called out for being a self-serving liar, how is that going to move our country forward?
In 2 or 6 years Trump will be gone, and all of the worlds problems will remain - probably much worse. Who are you going to blame then? The actual agents of political power, or whatever boogeyman those agents trot out for you to villianize?