- Oct 1, 2014
- 1,074
- 1
- 0
It's really simple. Do you guys think that our system makes sense and is good for the country?
1. In the US you can get a mediocre education with a $35,000 job waiting for you on the other end if you're lucky, and still pay $120,000 for a 4.5 year degree. Even if you were lucky and went to a good affordable school, in state, and lived at home, it will still cost you at least $50,000 in tuition.
2. In Europe you can pretty much get your education for free.
3. In South America it might cost you a couple thousand dollars a year for a good public university or you might pay quite a bit for your private school education but if you do you'll be studying with the kids of ambassadors and rich business people and at least make lots of contacts. It'll still be less than the $100k people are paying today. On top of that, with my friends at least, there are a lot of waiver programs that negate 100% of your education costs as long as you work in the country and don't just take your education and run.
I am starting to feel like we're heading in the opposite direction of everyone else. Am I missing the big picture? Why would you want your population to be heavily in debt or uneducated unless your motivation is not in the best interests of the people? How can our politicians talk about how great our economy has improved, how unemployment is really low, about GDP, but not address this ginormous problem?
I'm seeing too many schools with close to 100% acceptance rates, low graduation rates, low job prospects, but $100k costs. Why is this even legal? I'm also seeing tuition hikes that are approaching 300% in the last 10 or so years. Look at the CSU system for example. Look at community college tuition rates. Look at the UC system.
Up until a few days ago I thought it was only lawyers and doctors taking on 6 figure debt but from the looks of it, just about anyone who wants a degree today, and doesn't have the parents paying for it, will have to take on a very heavy burden.
1. In the US you can get a mediocre education with a $35,000 job waiting for you on the other end if you're lucky, and still pay $120,000 for a 4.5 year degree. Even if you were lucky and went to a good affordable school, in state, and lived at home, it will still cost you at least $50,000 in tuition.
2. In Europe you can pretty much get your education for free.
3. In South America it might cost you a couple thousand dollars a year for a good public university or you might pay quite a bit for your private school education but if you do you'll be studying with the kids of ambassadors and rich business people and at least make lots of contacts. It'll still be less than the $100k people are paying today. On top of that, with my friends at least, there are a lot of waiver programs that negate 100% of your education costs as long as you work in the country and don't just take your education and run.
I am starting to feel like we're heading in the opposite direction of everyone else. Am I missing the big picture? Why would you want your population to be heavily in debt or uneducated unless your motivation is not in the best interests of the people? How can our politicians talk about how great our economy has improved, how unemployment is really low, about GDP, but not address this ginormous problem?
I'm seeing too many schools with close to 100% acceptance rates, low graduation rates, low job prospects, but $100k costs. Why is this even legal? I'm also seeing tuition hikes that are approaching 300% in the last 10 or so years. Look at the CSU system for example. Look at community college tuition rates. Look at the UC system.
Up until a few days ago I thought it was only lawyers and doctors taking on 6 figure debt but from the looks of it, just about anyone who wants a degree today, and doesn't have the parents paying for it, will have to take on a very heavy burden.