Marriage as currently constructed does not promote monogamy. The current marriage system in America is basically to spend your 20s screwing everything that moves, then when you get tired of that settle down for a few years and then get divorced.
Also, ever hear of an open marriage. Something even "conservative" Newt Gingrich endorses.
Of course if you go back to the old school sex before marriage being wrong and divorce being frowned upon. Yeah that would promote monogamy.
Basically the question is do you think that people who spend years banging anything that moves currently will suddenly decide they want to have monogamous relationships because same-sex marriage is legal?
So why don't we let homosexuals in committed monogamous relationships, married in their church have their civil an legal rights as a married couple that constitution basically says they get.
Freedom of speech: I'm getting married to express that I love ass pounding so much that I'll even pound guys in the ass.(2) No where in the constitution does it say there is a right to same-sex marriage.
Oh, and op, I can find transcripts of crazy people saying anything you can possibly think of, 99.999999% of the population are smarter than this guy.
Freedom of speech: I'm getting married to express that I love ass pounding so much that I'll even pound guys in the ass.
I don't really follow why his reasoning has anything to do with gay marriage, I think he should be working to bring back their anti-sodomy laws instead.
I don't really follow why his reasoning has anything to do with gay marriage, I think he should be working to bring back their anti-sodomy laws instead.
I don't really follow why his reasoning has anything to do with gay marriage, I think he should be working to bring back their anti-sodomy laws instead.
(1) Why if they are "married" in a church should that have any impact on whether the government recognizes their relationship. Are you saying the government should recognize religious ceremonies?
(2) No where in the constitution does it say there is a right to same-sex marriage.
Do you have the right to play Pinochle on Saturdays in your own house? Where does it say that I'm the constitution?
Where does it say that in the Constitution?You have the right to play Pinochle on saturdays in your own house.
Have I argued that?You do not have the right to force the government to grant recognition your playing Pinochle and crown a Saturday Champion.
Why are you arguing against imaginary opponents? Can't argue against the real ones?See the difference?
Where does the Constitution say you have the right to eat bananas?EDIT: Right to privacy. Playing Pinochle in your house is a private activity. Demanding that the government crown a champion is not a private activity.
Where does it say that in the Constitution?
Have I argued that?
Why are you arguing against imaginary opponents? Can't argue against the real ones?
Where does the Constitution say you have the right to eat bananas?
And if you allow sodomites to marry each other how do you bring back sodomy laws?
Or is it only sodomy if the people are gay?
True Fact: No one has Sex outside of Marriage. No one, why would they?
Lol, thanks captain obvious. That would be why they are trying to pass a bill which does grant them that right.
And while I agree with your above post I also believe that since the government DOES recognize marriages that they have a valid argument that they are being discriminated against. I personally would much prefer the .gov to completely remove itself from marriage altogether. You would think that most of the "small government" right wing would be with me too, why should heterosexual couples be required to get permission from the government to get married? Sadly, this is one thing that they do want the government involved in which completely boggles my mind considering all of the specific stuff they want the .gov out of.
My wife enjoys sodomy and we both enjoy oral sodomy, I guess we shouldn't have been allowed to marry? Or is it only sodomy if the people are gay?
Yes, I have. Please answer my questions.You never heard of illegal search and seizures? Or the right to privacy?
These are not answers to my questions.What are you having a problem comprehending? There cannot be an inherent right to government recognized marriage. You are free to get married in your own church, and the government is free not to recognize it.
This is not an answer to my questions, either.But the idea that you have a right for the government to recognize your relationship is ridiculous and cannot be justified on any grounds.