... You are. 30 is a rather large amount.30 at the time and two 1 cm~ ones removed...supposed to do another within a year or two, Dr. wants to make sure I'm not a fast developer of polyps
And I guess you went for quality over quantity?First time had one polyp but it was 30mm!
Followup two years later none.
Fast for 48 hours+ and your polyps will go away. Just have to have the willpower to put the fork down. I've recently experienced a family member whose tumor (1 inch) went away before surgery using this method. It's the real deal.
Complete bullshit.NIH publication link to substantiate please.
... You are. 30 is a rather large amount.
Haha totally different.LOL oops I meant I was age 30 at the time, they found 2.
LOL oops I meant I was age 30 at the time, they found 2.
That's awfully young to be getting a colonoscopy. Did you have some sort of issue which necessitated it?
During ur Colonoscopsy
Sure buddy. I just gave you testimony from last week and you still don't believe it. It works, but feel free to ignore it and let your loved ones die of cancer. No sweat off my back, you're lucky I'm even taking time out of my day to enlighten you. Oh, and you may want to read this since you're too lazy to research it yourself. I've also posted about how my injured back was freakishly healed after my 50+hr fast.Complete bullshit.
The study in Science Translational Medicine, part of the Science family of journals, found that five out of eight cancer types in mice responded to fasting alone: Just as with chemotherapy, fasting slowed the growth and spread of tumors.
And without exception, “the combination of fasting cycles plus chemotherapy was either more or much more effective than chemo alone,” said senior author Valter Longo, professor of gerontology and biological sciences at the USC Davis School of Gerontology and the USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences.
For example, multiple cycles of fasting combined with chemotherapy cured 20 percent of mice with a highly aggressive type of children’s neuroendocrine cancer that had spread throughout the organism and 40 percent of mice with a more limited spread of the same cancer.
No mice survived in either case if treated only with chemotherapy.
...
As with any potential cancer treatment, fasting has its limits. The growth of large tumor masses was reduced by multiple fasting and chemotherapy cycles, but cancer-free survival could not be achieved. Longo speculated that cells inside a large tumor may be protected in some way or that the variety of mutations in a large mass may make it more adaptable.
But he noted that in most patients, oncologists have at least one chance to attack the cancer before it grows too large.
Sure buddy. I just gave you testimony from last week and you still don't believe it. It works, but feel free to ignore it and let your loved ones die of cancer. No sweat off my back, you're lucky I'm even taking time out of my day to enlighten you. Oh, and you may want to read this since you're too lazy to research it yourself. I've also posted about how my injured back was freakishly healed after my 50+hr fast.
https://news.usc.edu/78953/fasting-and-less-toxic-cancer-drug-could-be-alternative-to-chemotherapy/
https://news.usc.edu/29428/fasting-weakens-cancer-in-mice/
So basically if the tumor is too large, then you're still shit out of luck. But if we start fasting at a young enough age, it wouldn't get to that size in the first place.
"ur"???
I didn't realize that 13 year-olds were routinely getting colonoscopies these days.