Fake post. Reality Comey isn't loved by either side. The information on the other hand is a different story no matter who presents it.
Fake post. Reality Comey isn't loved by either side. The information on the other hand is a different story no matter who presents it.and...the Libs love Comey once again. This too shall pass.
Is Trump just going to move Fox News into the West Wing? Let the brainwashing continue. No wonder Trump supporters aren't that bright
Fake post. Reality Comey isn't loved by either side. The information on the other hand is a different story no matter who presents it.
The house is on fire, Trump is running around with a box of matches, and the GOP demands to know who called the fire department.
On the issue of surveillance.
http://canadafreepress.com/comments/disastrous-national-security-breach-in-u.s.-congress#Comments
I figured if from Canada it must be true.
The Left loved him when things landed their way and the same with the Right. That's how things generally work. People support those who back their position. Nothing insidious, it's just human nature.
I'm pretty sure most left-leaning folk gave up on the "hacked voting machines" angle after it was debunked in December as Fake News...you'll always see a few outliers at the extremes making noise. I think most sensible Democrats believe Hillary still would've lost if there hadn't been any Russian shenanigans, because the right wingnuts had their lie machine spun up long before those Macedonian kids got involved (Breitbart, InfoWars, Rush...not Russian.)Going to Adm. Rogers, Nunes said, “Do you have any evidence that Russian actors changed vote tallies in the state of Michigan?” referring to a battleground state Hillary Clinton lost.
“No, I do not,” Rogers responded, before emphasizing the NSA is a foreign intelligence agency, and does not focus domestically.
“How about the state of Pennsylvania?” Nunes asked.
“No, sir,” Rogers responded.
“The state of Wisconsin?”
“No, sir,” Rogers said.
He gave similar answers when asked about vote tallying in Florida, North Carolina and Ohio.
Turning to Comey, Nunes said, “Do you have any evidence that the FBI that any votes were changed in the states I mentioned to Adm. Rogers?”
“No,” Comey responded.http://www.theamericanmirror.com/fbi-nsa-no-evidence-russia-manipulated-us-vote-tallying/
Three brothers...Muslim...ZOMG!! Muslim Brotherhood infiltrated Congress!!!!Nothing like quoting right wing conspiracy theory site. You are almost as bad as Trump.
Yeah, so now we are being told Gen. Flynn was a volunteer. You just can't make up this shit. They definitely have something to hide.The speed with which the administration and Trump's surrogates are trying to sprint away from Paul Manafort after Comey's testimony is interesting. They're borderline trying to create an alt-universe where he doesn't exist. CNN was straight up playing a clip montage of Trump and his campaign people singing Manafort's praises when surrogates tried to back up Spicer's assertion that his role was small and limited.
I can only presume there is something bad for Trump buried in that relationship and/or Manafort's contacts.
I think most sensible Democrats believe Hillary still would've lost if there hadn't been any Russian shenanigans, because the right wingnuts had their lie machine spun up long before those Macedonian kids got involved (Breitbart, InfoWars, Rush...not Russian.)
I'm pretty sure most left-leaning folk gave up on the "hacked voting machines" angle after it was debunked in December as Fake News...you'll always see a few outliers at the extremes making noise. I think most sensible Democrats believe Hillary still would've lost if there hadn't been any Russian shenanigans, because the right wingnuts had their lie machine spun up long before those Macedonian kids got involved (Breitbart, InfoWars, Rush...not Russian.)
Why do we care? I want to know if the Trump campaign colluded with Russian intelligence on any of the DNC/Podesta hacks, or even if they were given access to some of the leaked documents ahead of Wikileaks, as some folks seemed to have knowledge of it before those emails were released. Were any favors traded for access to those emails? That would be some Watergate-type shit right there, not to mention treason. I also want to know why Putin is so favorable of Trump, or why Trump speaks so highly of Putin. Is there anything there other than Trump is just a moron who can be easily manipulated, or Putin just hated Hillary that much? I don't believe in the "pee pee tape" but would like to know how invested Trump is in Russia either directly or indirectly.
But voting machines? I would welcome a law requiring all state voting machine vendors to open-source their code, but other than that, don't care.
Between Flynn and Manafort they are distancing themselves for something. Trump has access to just about all information out there. Not sure what info the investigators turn up he would have access too as one of the subjects but they are setting the table for something that they seem to know about.Yeah, so now we are being told Gen. Flynn was a volunteer. You just can't make up this shit. They definitely have something to hide.
What I've seen being reported is that Flynn and the Orange Don were practically inseparable during the campaign and that he was "a calming influence". Yea, he was probably confirming all of his paranoid delusions.Between Flynn and Manafort they are distancing themselves for something. Trump has access to just about all information out there. Not sure what info the investigators turn up he would have access too as one of the subjects but they are setting the table for something that they seem to know about.
maxi proves that with nearly every post.Nope, we have plenty of wingnuts.
Nothing to see. Move on.Seems they are backing away from everyone. Now Carter Page who was a foreign policy adviser and J.D. Gordon who was his National Security Adviser are both "fringe players" whom Trump doesn't know personally according to Conway on Fox this morning.
Well, pick a site you like.Nothing like quoting right wing conspiracy theory site. You are almost as bad as Trump.
-snip-
or Putin just hated Hillary that much?
When mass protests against Russian President Vladimir Putin erupted in Moscow in December 2011, Putin made clear who he thought was really behind them: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
With the protesters accusing Putin of having rigged recent elections, the Russian leader pointed an angry finger at Clinton, who had issued a statement sharply critical of the voting results. “She said they were dishonest and unfair,” Putin fumed in public remarks, saying that Clinton gave “a signal” to demonstrators working “with the support of the U.S. State Department” to undermine his power. “We need to safeguard ourselves from this interference in our internal affairs,” Putin declared.