Sounds like she tried to sleep her way to the top...when that didn't work, she cried "RAPE!"
Suppose this is true it seems to me that this guy is in even more trouble as he effectively used fox resources, lots of them, to pay for his prostitutes, with all the colleteral damage to the company as a result.. I assume fox will be suing the man for millions over this. Right?I agree.
She said that over the next two years she was forced to engage in a sexual relationship with Mr. Payne. In exchange, she said, she received career opportunities, including increased appearances on Fox News and Fox Business and the promise that Mr. Payne would help her land a contributor contract, a job that can pay several hundred thousand dollars a year.
Wheeling and dealing.
Suppose this is true it seems to me that this guy is in even more trouble as he effectively used fox resources, lots of them, to pay for his prostitutes, with all the colleteral damage to the company as a result.. I assume fox will be suing the man for millions over this. Right?
FOX has already cleared Mr. Payne of any wrong doing.
She was a prostitute and things didn't quite work out for her and here we are...
Seems the culture of using sex for manipulating your career is set from the very top by Ailes Billo, etc. I would think it would go against their loyal viewers moral sensibilities. If they had them.Easy with the quick facts there... thats how climate change denial gets started.
Even so, if FOX cleared the man for using fox promotions and fox career advances as payment for sex that says as much about FOX as it does Payne.
True Christians those folk. spit.
Easy with the quick facts there... thats how climate change denial gets started.
Even so, if FOX cleared the man for using fox promotions and fox career advances as payment for sex that says as much about FOX as it does Payne.
True Christians those folk. spit.
I think you got our posts mixed up .. review mine an all of them says something like "if..." and then some case. You are the one with the "facts".You are assuming what she says is the truth. I am not. Like I said earlier she was putting out on the hopes that ... When it didn't pan out then she cries rape.
I think you got our posts mixed up .. review mine an all of them says something like "if..." and then some case. You are the one with the "facts".
I guess that is the fundamental difference between alot of the conservatives and liberals here. You deal in absolutes with regard to an event that havent occured yet and if your horse happens to win down the road you will point back to this post, where you delt in an absolute, and proclaim you were right... and thats the thing, no matter what happens in court two months from now you can never be right today, its just not possible, the universe is not wired that way. Say I believe you assesment is correct to approx 80 percent. Thats not enough to convict her of false allegation of rape in my book. If you arrived at 100pct based on the currently available evidence then THAT is the fundamental core disagreement we have, forget politics and everything in between, dialog is futile if we cannot agree on the protocol of communication.I guess we will see when it gets thrown out of court...