http://www.computerbase.de/2016-02/...-2/2/#diagramm-pvz-garden-warfare-2-1920-1080
AMD Crimson 16.2 beta
Nvidia GeForce 361.91 WHQL
AMD Crimson 16.2 beta
Nvidia GeForce 361.91 WHQL
Looks like the game performs well on both platforms but AMD pulling ahead in these newer games is starting to become a trend.
Looks like the game performs well on both platforms but AMD pulling ahead in these newer games is starting to become a trend.
They are preparing for Pascal. Maxwell is a little too sharp so they need to blunt the tip of that sword a little.
AMD has really been doing a good job on their drivers lately, especially for newer games.
Unreal 4 favors Nvidia - not fair.
Frostbite favors AMD - fair.
:hmm:
Looks like the game performs well on both platforms but AMD pulling ahead in these newer games is starting to become a trend.
Intel Core 7-6700K, Asus Z170-Deluxe, vier Mal vier (4x4) Gigabyte DDR4-Speicher (angesteuert mit DDR4-3.000)
Unreal 4 favors Nvidia - not fair.
Frostbite favors AMD - fair.
:hmm:
This late into the game, is anyone still considering 980 Ti or Fury X?
Time for some Polaris vs Pascal goodness!!! Bring on the next gen!
- Do people really say this?
The only argument I could follow for this is Epic integrated NV tech into their engine (which is a good move by NV, getting in on the ground floor) and the frostbyte engine being brand agnostic as far as third party plug-ins.
- Do people really say this?
The only argument I could follow for this is Epic integrated NV tech into their engine (which is a good move by NV, getting in on the ground floor) and the frostbyte engine being brand agnostic as far as third party plug-ins.
make it 50%-60% to be fair
and on those super duper clocked ones it goes on 80%-90% not even gonna mention the ones running on liquid helium they go OVER 9000%
no you cant only a biased person will actually measure a refrence card with non refrence oneI know how much it hurts to buy Fury X over GTX 980 Ti. I did not go through that experience ,however, i can understand the pain.
Check out the first one! The characters and abilities are a lot more balanced.It looks like most people can enjoy this game at 1440p maxed out, which is awesome. This game looks like a lot of fun. I might actually end up getting this at some point.
I played the first one and it was fun for a while but got boring eventually. Havent tried this one. I always thought it was weird that they used Frostbyte for it. Seems like serious overkill. Does this game support Mantle?
OP always post AMD winning benchmarks and do not even bother to post this because AMD is losing in this one.
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Plant...5633/Specials/Technik-Test-Benchmark-1187424/
As i said 100 times that plz do not post GTX 980 Ti reference benchmarks at stock. Mostly people buy custom GTX 980 Ti which are 20% to 30% faster then Fury X .
So they took a custom 980 TI, then OC'd it even more (its 33% OC'd from stock) is 25% faster @ 1080p, 16% faster @ 1440p, and only 11% faster @ 4k... from a 33% Overclock.
Whats the power usage and heat like from that sucker? A 980 TI @ 25% OC was already using more power than Fury X according to Anandtech's testing.
Huur Duur power usage only matters when comparing stock clocked cards. You see any argument that make NVIDIA appear superior to AMD is what matters. Derp derp
So they took a custom 980 TI, then OC'd it even more (its 33% OC'd from stock) is 25% faster @ 1080p, 16% faster @ 1440p, and only 11% faster @ 4k... from a 33% Overclock.
Whats the power usage and heat like from that sucker? A 980 TI @ 25% OC was already using more power than Fury X according to Anandtech's testing.